![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) |
| 13.7B Light Years+ Location: 42 N, 83 W Posts: 952 | This has been discussed before but I think it was another site. Although I'm an atheist, I can say..... It depends on what denomination you talk too. I can't quote passages, but there are some that say something to the effect that those without knowledge of god can still get in. Others will site John 3:16, and say no, the only way is through Jesus. Others will argue that "God" is in everyones heart and therefore you do have knowledge of him. Obviously thats a weak argument. Obviously, if you lack any knowledge of the christian god, and CAN get into heaven, then the better option would be to get christians to STOP preaching all over the world to those without knowledge because they stand a better chance of getting in than if they KNOW about jesus and don't accept the story. I know about Jesus, but don't accept the story, so assuming christians are right, then I'm doomed, but the native in some south american country who never heard of jesus could get in. Apparently Kids and mentally hadicapped people who can't understand the concepts of god are also given a special pass. Here is what Evangelicals believe... but if you ask me, the don't really answer the question very good; What about those who have never heard the Gospel?Source God is superfluous, nuff said ![]() Life Made Easy, without a god Big Bang Misconceptions String Theory for the Layman |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
| I'm NOT Perfect. Location: Maryland Posts: 64 | Many Christians will reference something along the lines of, "creation testifies to God; no one has any reason to reject Him". And some will state that the ignorant will be saved, as well as those who fall in the category of the age of accountability. However, I am unsure if a person should believe God (according to the Bible) exists because of creation/the world/the universe because if the world/universe was created, that would not necessitate that the creator (possibly creators) sent His only begotten Son to die for us. This is where ideas, such as the FSM come in, if you think that the universe/the world supports anything other than a (somewhat) deist god(s). I do not have signature. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) | |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Quote:
Regards S. | |
|
| | #6 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 15 | Not to mention slaves and everything else are accepted by "God", meaning it is obviously a complete fabrication by people. "God is outside of time"... bullshit. That is a book of its time in every respect. And yeah, the guys who created it obviously didn't make enough magical rules. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) |
| Kuldeep Location: Bhopa, M.P, India Posts: 1,640 | Right action is the best door for entry to Heaven. Wrong action is the door for hell. Your consciouness is the judge or God, as you may call. Hell and heaven is your own imagination. Nothing is out there, but whatever actions (good or bad) one accepts are done by him; he is bound to get back a reaction. The situation of mind while passing through that reaction, is hell or heaven for him, as the case may be !!! |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) (top) |
| Molten Ash Posts: 137 | Only God knows what's in a person's heart; so this isn't directed towards any one individual.. But say a person had never heard of Jesus and died. Christ himself says: "I AM the Way, the Truth, and the Life, no one comes to the Father except through me." So yeah, said person would suffer eternal damnation.. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) (top) |
| 13.7B Light Years+ Location: 42 N, 83 W Posts: 952 | So even though cannibals in Africa (and other places?) who've never heard of the bible god, who find it perfectly natural to eat human flesh, will be judged based on actions they find normal? :rolleyes: God is superfluous, nuff said ![]() Life Made Easy, without a god Big Bang Misconceptions String Theory for the Layman |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Location: Hong Kong (for now) Posts: 7,017 | You guys are forgetting that, apart from heaven and hell, there's limbo. ![]() Limbo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The term Limbo refers to two distinct concepts: * The Limbo of the Patriarchs or Limbo of the Fathers (Latin Limbus Patrum), also the Bosom of Abraham, is the temporary state of those who, in spite of the personal sins they may have committed, died in the friendship of God, but could not enter Heaven until redemption by Jesus Christ made it possible. The term was a medieval name for the part of the abode of the dead where the patriarchs of the Old Testament were believed to be kept until Jesus descended to the dead after his crucifixion and freed them. This limbo is described in the Catechism of the Catholic Church. * The Limbo of Infants refers to a hypothetical permanent status of the unbaptized who die in infancy, too young to have committed personal sins, but not having been freed from original sin. Some who hold the theory of the Limbo of Infants regard it as a state of maximum natural happiness, others as one of "mildest punishment" consisting at least of privation of the beatific vision and of any hope of obtaining it. This theory, in any of its forms, has never been dogmatically defined by the Church, and recent Catholic theological speculation stresses more the hope that these infants may attain heaven instead of the supposed state of Limbo, while the directly opposed theological opinion also exists, namely that there is no afterlife state intermediate between salvation and damnation, and that all the unbaptized are damned. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) (top) | |
| Heaven? Try skydivin Posts: 433 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 137 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) (top) | |
| Guest Posts: n/a | Quote:
Regards S. | |
|
| | #19 (permalink) (top) | |
| Heaven? Try skydivin Posts: 433 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 137 | Yes, their ignorance is condemning them, but NOT their INNOCENT ignorance. Quote:
| |
| | |