When did I say logic?
I didn't, I said "such logical syllogisms as in the OP."
Zhavric's syllogism depended on set values for "god" and "universe" - values which can't be inferred from what we know about the two.
When you take that into account, his syllogism collapses.
You grossly mischaracterized my argument. I'd appreciate it if you gave it a little more thought than this last one-liner.