![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #182 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 248 | This tomb in particular was revisited if that you mean. He made more findings then they had previously. I'm not entirely familiar if they actually claimed it to be Jesus' tomb at that time though. I'll have to look what they did claim up if that's the case. |
| | |
| | #183 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,741 | You mention good points, and I don't disagree. I respect and appreciate archeology. I agree that every glimpse into our past deepens our understanding of ourselves and the world we lived in then. I was just pointing out that in regards the topic of the thread, there isn't any need to find Jesus' tomb, and the possibility of doing so intentionally is extremely small. Not to mention that the TV show, while occasionally enlightening, was generally disappointing for me. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |