Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

jascowhiz0 · Mar 11, 2007, 12:23 am

I was told the Jesus Tomb was debunked 20-30 years ago. That this story is coming back up now just for publicity.

Eclipse · Mar 11, 2007, 12:26 am

This tomb in particular was revisited if that you mean. He made more findings then they had previously. I'm not entirely familiar if they actually claimed it to be Jesus' tomb at that time though. I'll have to look what they did claim up if that's the case.

**Jack** · Mar 11, 2007, 12:29 am

You mention good points, and I don't disagree. I respect and appreciate archeology. I agree that every glimpse into our past deepens our understanding of ourselves and the world we lived in then. I was just pointing out that in regards the topic of the thread, there isn't any need to find Jesus' tomb, and the possibility of doing so intentionally is extremely small. Not to mention that the TV show, while occasionally enlightening, was generally disappointing for me.

Eclipse · Mar 11, 2007, 03:48 am

Heh. I'll agree with you there.

Mar 11, 2007, 12:23 am	#181 (permalink) (top)
jascowhiz0 Looking for the exit Posts: 111	I was told the Jesus Tomb was debunked 20-30 years ago. That this story is coming back up now just for publicity. Money can buy what you don't have.

Mar 11, 2007, 12:29 am	#183 (permalink) (top)
Jack formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,741	You mention good points, and I don't disagree. I respect and appreciate archeology. I agree that every glimpse into our past deepens our understanding of ourselves and the world we lived in then. I was just pointing out that in regards the topic of the thread, there isn't any need to find Jesus' tomb, and the possibility of doing so intentionally is extremely small. Not to mention that the TV show, while occasionally enlightening, was generally disappointing for me. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant)

Mar 11, 2007, 12:26 am	#182 (permalink) (top)
Eclipse Igneous Magma Posts: 248	This tomb in particular was revisited if that you mean. He made more findings then they had previously. I'm not entirely familiar if they actually claimed it to be Jesus' tomb at that time though. I'll have to look what they did claim up if that's the case.

Mar 11, 2007, 03:48 am	#184 (permalink) (top)
Eclipse Igneous Magma Posts: 248	Heh. I'll agree with you there.