Conspiracy Theory

[PatrickHenry]

Many intellectuals fear this term, this label. Not I.

Who will deny that conspiracies exist? Only a fool like the (now banned) member Nurse Sheep.

But we all know that they exist; criminal conspiracies are prosecuted by our justice system. A conspiracy is simply a secret agreement between two or more persons to engage in a criminal act. Nothing new or revolutionary.

And since they are SECRET, they are subject to theorizing based upon evidence. Hence absent a credible sworn confession by a participant, every conspiracy is in fact a conspiracy theory.

Why do I call your attention to such a topic?

Because there is no greater turning point in modern history than the events of September 11, 2001. And I submit that the evidence for my conspiracy theory is more convincing than the evidence for the official conspiracy theory.

The official story is flawed at the level of the physical evidence, since steel framed buildings do not completely collapse due to fire. This is a confirmed historical fact. The WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7 were demolished with explosive charges. The demolition explosions are clearly visible to one who observes the collapse sequences closely. Conservation of momentum is one of the physics principles that is not taken into account by the official conspiracy theory.

It is also flawed from many historical perspectives. Many warnings by foreign governments and US intelligence were ignored by the administration.The SS was nonchalant when they were presented with evidence of a security breach against the nation and the President's location was exposed to the attackers. The response of NORAD was historically anomalous as well. All previous hijacks of airliners were met by combat air patrols.

http://carolynbaker.org/archives/911...-carolyn-baker

So, my question for the forum is this: Why do you choose your particular conspiracy theory? :eek:

[Osborn F Enready]

I choose the one I have been accused of having, because it is the most logical, most likely, most "profittable", by the greatest number from which I have seen. The overlay of history, fits. The overlay of facts, fit. The Constitutional flaws, fit, and most importantly, it perfectly fits human nature.

[Gods_Mercenary]

I choose it because it, as Osborn says, fits human nature and doesn't assume super powerful and omnipotent Government "organisations".

By the way, if your conspiracy theory existed, don't you think you'd be dead by now, I mean, america's actually listening to people like you. If I was in charge of the "organisation" I'd have you capped.

[Osborn F Enready]

I defend myself well.

I am battle them equally, daily.

As of now, there are only threats and partial promises of infringing on my rights, personally. I battle them with equal and opposite reaction with written and verbal information campaigns to awaken my fellow citizens.

Once they move to take action to infringe on my rights, personally, or en-masse, I will also react equal, but opposite.

Their power resides in peoples will to buy into the threat, the lies and the myths, and that is all that gives them power over the people, for whom their fear is equal.

[Gods_Mercenary]

I was actually talking to pat, should've been more specific. And from what I know about you osborn, I'm sure you'd make a spectacular blaze of glory when the Government took you out.

[Osborn F Enready]

Or, would it be the spark that ignited the combustible that is government?

[Gods_Mercenary]

Indeed, I'd make you the hero for the revolution against the facist overlords! I'd be the leader, of course :) now who else could we get?...

[Osborn F Enready]

Gods Merc said:
Indeed, I'd make you the hero for the revolution against the facist overlords! I'd be the leader, of course now who else could we get?...

Droll.

[Clarence]

I choose the one I have been accused of having, because it is the most logical, most likely, most "profittable", by the greatest number from which I have seen. The overlay of history, fits. The overlay of facts, fit. The Constitutional flaws, fit, and most importantly, it perfectly fits human nature.


As of now, there are only threats and partial promises of infringing on my rights, personally. I battle them with equal and opposite reaction with written and verbal information campaigns to awaken my fellow citizens.

second

If I was in charge of the "organisation" I'd have you capped.

That's basically something we should expect. I stay wide open and vulnerable on principle. I don't where the line in the sand is yet. Many of us are well known for our pov's.

america's actually listening to people like you.

the sad thing is, I wish we were wrong about the whole thing. It's like when you grow so cold it's warm and there's that temptation to just succomb to the warmth and take a nap. Everytime, there's some sign of life from the people. be it a news article or personal experience or disney movie (don't ask) that makes me feel obligated to continue and say what I'm thinking cuz it just might help.

On topic, the bottom line for me is this. The globalist totalitarian movement, people are describing on teh interwebs, has moved outside of conspiracy by definition. I see powerful muscles being flexed all up in our optical. I look to my left and right and there's many people standing wide-eyed while most sleeping fitful sleep. unaware and innocent. There is finally enough people who are watching to consider. 'Conspiracy' has negative stgmata. To many conspiracy theory means false. I wish more people understood what Pat says

A conspiracy is simply a secret agreement between two or more persons to engage in a criminal act. Nothing new or revolutionary.

[Osborn F Enready]

Clarence said:
I wish more people understood what Pat says

I agree Clarence.

[Zhavric]

Conspiracy theory is unspeak (doublespeak maybe?) for one of two terms:

1) An actual event with evidence which a group wishes to portray as fictional. Example: The Watergate scandal began as a conspiracy theory of a pair of reporters.

2) A fictional event without evidence which a group wishes to portray as actual. Example: The "existence" of WMD's in Iraq.

The only way to discern one from the other is with evidence & by safeguarding against considering propaganda as proof.

[Clarence]

Is that true?