Many intellectuals fear this term, this label. Not I.
Who will deny that conspiracies exist? Only a fool like the (now banned) member Nurse Sheep.
But we all know that they exist; criminal conspiracies are prosecuted by our justice system. A conspiracy is simply a secret agreement between two or more persons to engage in a criminal act. Nothing new or revolutionary.
And since they are SECRET, they are subject to theorizing based upon evidence. Hence absent a credible sworn confession by a participant, every conspiracy is in fact a conspiracy theory.
Why do I call your attention to such a topic?
Because there is no greater turning point in modern history than the events of September 11, 2001. And I submit that the evidence for my conspiracy theory is more convincing than the evidence for the official conspiracy theory.
The official story is flawed at the level of the physical evidence, since steel framed buildings do not completely collapse due to fire. This is a confirmed historical fact. The WTC buildings 1, 2, and 7 were demolished with explosive charges. The demolition explosions are clearly visible to one who observes the collapse sequences closely. Conservation of momentum is one of the physics principles that is not taken into account by the official conspiracy theory.
It is also flawed from many historical perspectives. Many warnings by foreign governments and US intelligence were ignored by the administration.The SS was nonchalant when they were presented with evidence of a security breach against the nation and the President's location was exposed to the attackers. The response of NORAD was historically anomalous as well. All previous hijacks of airliners were met by combat air patrols.
So, my question for the forum is this: Why do you choose your particular conspiracy theory? :eek: