Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Philosophy & Religion


This topic in Philosophy & Religion is about Methods for proving God's existence?.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:16 pm   #1 (permalink) (top)
InTheFlesh?
Comfortably Dumb
 
InTheFlesh?'s Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 57
Methods for proving God's existence?

I thought it would be fun to bounce ideas for proving God exists in a scientific way...

They can be completely wacky or other wise...

I thought if we took an atom transporter (like in Star Trek) and weighed the universe then transported the whole universe from one place to another and weighed it again, then the difference in mass would be the weight of God.

As the atom transporter would break everything to atoms and transported them, God could not be transported, as he can't be broken down??

I don't know??
InTheFlesh? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:22 pm   #2 (permalink) (top)
Jagged
99 Red Balloons
 
Jagged's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 274
We exist. Therefore God exists.

People say god exists, therefore God exists.

I saw God, therefore he exists.

God loves me, and i can feel it; therefore God exists.

Evolution doesn't make sense, therefore God exists.

Im pretty sure i covered all the obvious ones.


Jagged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:27 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
Jack
formerly Isherwood
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,209
Don't forget; the bible say god exists, therefore God exists. :)


The Forum Rules
Radical Atheist
Heathen Queer
Let's agree to respect each others views,
no matter how wrong yours may be.
(Ashleigh Brilliant)
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:28 pm   #4 (permalink) (top)
Hostile55
Get the f*** down!
 
Hostile55's Avatar
 
Posts: 107
I have a diviniscope with which I can actually see God. Its amazing. God looks exactly like an empty space.
Hostile55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:31 pm   #5 (permalink) (top)
InTheFlesh?
Comfortably Dumb
 
InTheFlesh?'s Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 57
Cheers for that but I meant like actual evidence that no one can refute.

To you God may exist and so his existance to you is truth, but to an atheist his non existance is truth. When truth is this confused it is hard to define wrong or right.

I am looking for something that says "God exists because..."

I get what you are saying about why God exists because we say he does, but in a literal sense unicorns and fairies exist because we say they do, as does Harry Potter.
InTheFlesh? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:37 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Jack
formerly Isherwood
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,209
Quote:
in a literal sense unicorns and fairies exist because we say they do, as does Harry Potter.
Bingo! So if you want proof of god, shall we also provide proof for unicorns and Harry Potter? They're all equally likely.


The Forum Rules
Radical Atheist
Heathen Queer
Let's agree to respect each others views,
no matter how wrong yours may be.
(Ashleigh Brilliant)
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:40 pm   #7 (permalink) (top)
InTheFlesh?
Comfortably Dumb
 
InTheFlesh?'s Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 57
yes

any ideas how?
InTheFlesh? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:49 pm   #8 (permalink) (top)
Jack
formerly Isherwood
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,209
Sure. All we need to do is find a herd of unicorns being tended by Harry Potter. That should settle things once and for all. No doubt our discovery would be widely reported...from the front page of the Weekly World News.


The Forum Rules
Radical Atheist
Heathen Queer
Let's agree to respect each others views,
no matter how wrong yours may be.
(Ashleigh Brilliant)
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 03:57 pm   #9 (permalink) (top)
InTheFlesh?
Comfortably Dumb
 
InTheFlesh?'s Avatar
 
Location: England
Posts: 57
doesn't that happen in one of the books??

Does J.K Rowling know something we don't?

OK what about something that absolutely proves all life was created by god, something like the babel fish in Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

What about maths???? Maths is absolute. so can we find an equation to solve god or prove god exists??

If god exists would way of proving it?

If we re-wrote the bible in binary, then there could be no misinterpretations right? Binary can't be misread, or misunderstood, surely it is just 0 or 1, all or nothing, the alpha and the omega!

woo God=Binary???
InTheFlesh? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 04:53 pm   #10 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,922
I would like to see all the religious put their faith to the test.

Go into combat against armed people, using only your faith and books of holy guidance.

This will end the argument real quick.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 05:32 pm   #11 (permalink) (top)
Lullaby Chainer
 
Lullaby Chainer's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,019
Quote:
Quote by: Isherwood View Post
Don't forget; the bible say god exists, therefore God exists. :)
And don't forget, God wrote the bible, so it has to be true. Unless you're delusional or something.


Powerful.. magical.. e-e-e-eevil..
Lullaby Chainer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 05:57 pm   #12 (permalink) (top)
aebe
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 11
The philospher Emanuel Kant has written in his Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. First clasifying the proofs of God in 4 cartegories, And showed from each category they were false. So please read that source. And about believes is not to discuss.

Also in mathematics Kurt Gödel has proved mathematically each theory is incomplete. Please googel for that. And further you have all nomal scientists against you. For sciences aren't complete.

When you believe in it. Please show me what weather it will be on 10 April 2007, Or pray for it. Your pray is then for nothing.

Last edited by aebe; Dec 17, 2006 at 06:02 pm. Reason: typos
aebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 07:42 pm   #13 (permalink) (top)
Zhavric
Made of pure win.
 
Zhavric's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,808
Quote:
Quote by: Jagged View Post
God loves me, and i can feel it; therefore God exists.
You forgot fonceia's favorite: "I have experienced god therefor god exists, but only for me."

If I were a theist I'd go for this one, too. It would allow me to avoid stickly logical situations where evidence and reason are present and still make it seem like I'm not holding to blind faith.

Getting back on track, there are plenty of ways to prove god exists. The bible is full of very obvious stories that would prove god (or at least a supernatural entity). The problem is that all of these evidences are fabricated.
Zhavric is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2006, 09:53 pm   #14 (permalink) (top)
Cephus
Hot Lava
 
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 2,347
Quote:
Quote by: Jagged View Post
We exist. Therefore God exists.

People say god exists, therefore God exists.

I saw God, therefore he exists.

God loves me, and i can feel it; therefore God exists.

Evolution doesn't make sense, therefore God exists.

Im pretty sure i covered all the obvious ones.
Well, you covered the irrational, ridiculous ones at least.


Jesus loves me? No thanks, I don't swing that way.

Blog Me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 08:47 am   #15 (permalink) (top)
ItsDarts
13.7B Light Years+
 
ItsDarts's Avatar
 
Location: 42 N, 83 W
Posts: 1,018
Quote:
Quote by: ITF
Cheers for that but I meant like actual evidence that no one can refute.
This is exactly what keeps me an atheist. There is no evidence that "no one can refute" (yet?). If there was, there would be no logical reason to worship any other god(s). We have been worshiping various gods since the beginning of recorded history and probably before that. Since mankind, as a whole, has never been able to agree on any one or group of gods, the rational conclusion seems to be that all of the gods we have worshipped are false untill evidence says differently. Mankind can all agree gravity exists, there is evidence that it acts the exact same way for you as it does me. We can't see gravity, but we can observe its effects. It would seem that if there is any god, even ones we can't see, we should be able to ALL observe its effect and these obsevations should be the same for everyone.
ItsDarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 10:20 am   #16 (permalink) (top)
voyager
Molten Ash
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 103
God exhists for all of us. As an object of thought, other wise we would not be posting comments if "he" exhisted.
The real question is, "Does god exhist as more than an object of thought?"
Unfortunately, or not, science cannot help in deternining the truth of this statement. Science can only deal with questions that can be observed or quantified, only the matter we can measure or experience.
If god exhists he would exhist outside the material world. Substantial but not material.
If this is a bit hard to understand strech your inagination, it is infinite, sort of like god.
voyager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 10:48 am   #17 (permalink) (top)
Zhavric
Made of pure win.
 
Zhavric's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,808
Quote:
Quote by: voyager View Post
Unfortunately, or not, science cannot help in deternining the truth of this statement. Science can only deal with questions that can be observed or quantified, only the matter we can measure or experience.
Science has peered into distant galaxies and unlocked the building blocks of life. We've broken the bonds of our own planet and unlocked sub-atomic particles. Why on earth would you assert that something is beyond science? The utter lack of evidence on the part of theists isn't a shortcoming on the part of science in any way.

It's not the responsibility nor the shortcoming of the Astronomer to find invisible space monkeys.
Zhavric is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 10:59 am   #18 (permalink) (top)
ItsDarts
13.7B Light Years+
 
ItsDarts's Avatar
 
Location: 42 N, 83 W
Posts: 1,018
Quote:
Quote by: voyager View Post
God exhists for all of us. As an object of thought, other wise we would not be posting comments if "he" exhisted.
If god is nothing more than an "object of thought" than to worship this "object of thought" is meaningless. It's akin to worshiping any other "object of thought" such as flying spaghetti mosters or Unicorns.
Quote:
The real question is, "Does god exhist as more than an object of thought?"
Unfortunately, or not, science cannot help in deternining the truth of this statement.
It might be able too if it existed as anything but an "object of thought".
Quote:
Science can only deal with questions that can be observed or quantified, only the matter we can measure or experience.
If god exhists he would exhist outside the material world.
Define "outside" of a material world. Then provide evidence of this "outside"
Quote:
Substantial but not material.
meaningless and unsupported statement.
Quote:
If this is a bit hard to understand strech your inagination, it is infinite, sort of like god.
Ahhhh.... so god is only a part of (sic) inagination? This would explain why there are so many gods that man has "imagined".
ItsDarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 12:31 pm   #19 (permalink) (top)
Fonceai
BANNED
 
Location: New York
Posts: 4,217
Quote:
Quote by: Z
You forgot fonceia's favorite: "I have experienced god therefor god exists, but only for me."
Misrepresented quotation.

It's more along the lines of that whatever a person thinks is proof of God really only makes sense to that person.

Otherwise, current science has no way to prove or disprove the existence of God.
Fonceai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 03:27 pm   #20 (permalink) (top)
Zhavric
Made of pure win.
 
Zhavric's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,808
Quote:
Quote by: Fonceai View Post
It's more along the lines of that whatever a person thinks is proof of God really only makes sense to that person.
Sadly, this has been demonstrated multiple time on this board and others...

Quote:
Otherwise, current science has no way to prove or disprove the existence of God.
Things as outlandish as god require evidence before we can take them out of the category of "false until proven true".
Zhavric is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Problem Mortgage Mobile Phone Buy Shares Gas Suppliers Internet Advertising
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10