God Paradox

[Castle]

Quote by: Kuroko where my friend does logic say nature (if there were no god that is) would see emotions as a necessity to our particullar piece of survival hmm?

That's science (evolution and natural selection), not logic.

Quote by: Kuroko Dont' be so misguided into thinking there is a law to logic. Also don't allow others to be so misguided into thinking logic should be a law.

Laws of classical logic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote by: Kuroko If you pick physical.. then I will say god can willfully move the rock, yet managed to make a rock that he could not physically move.. therefore the rock is both movable (by gods will) and unmovable (by gods physical form)

Then it's not immovable. Immovable is the opposite of movable. Movable is defined as "capable of being moved". Thus, immovable is defined as "incapable of being moved". Come on, this isn't that tough.

Quote by: Kuroko then god would make an equally impressive rock on the other end of that seesaw (he did it once, what says he cannot again) and then he would sit on that rock.. and the rock which he could not previously move would move..

Then the rock is movable. If it is capable of being moved (which it is, because it moved), then it is not immovable, by the definition of immovable.

[Fonceai]

@samsara15

What if God isn't immortal and passes stewardship over Creation to a successor?

It's possible that one God could create an immovable rock, but the successor could, right?

Varying levels of infinity are only possible of God is not omnipotent.