Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Philosophy & Religion


This topic in Philosophy & Religion is about Ban The Bible.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 7, 2006, 02:09 am   #21 (permalink) (top)
phoenix_fire
Paladin
 
phoenix_fire's Avatar
 
Location: Narnia
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul View Post
In my opinon I do not think that a lot of people truely see how insane the world has become due to such influences.

<snip>

If we are going to warn kids about the possible bad side effects of tobacco, pot, drugs, booze, and unsafe sex, then why not at least have TV ads warning people about the possible bad side effects of religion and Biblical addiction?
Alrighty then. I, many of my friends, and a lot of the people that I look up to read the Bible all the time. We believe it. We are not insane. We do not believe in killing people for any reason. We believe in treating others better than ourselves and in self-sacrifice for those that we love and for complete strangers. We work in the community to help the less fortunate. We are counselors and teachers. We strive toward a standard of excellence because of the Bible. The only true fault that you could agree to in all honesty is that we believe differently from you on matters of cosmology.

I find your comparisons in the poorest of taste and entirely absent of validity. There is no good use of tobacco. It blackens your lungs and teeth and fingers and kills you slowly and painfully. There is no good use of pot (or any other mind-altering chemical). They screw up your head and just might get you killed. While some dietary alcohol may be good for you, if it gets to the point of "booze", then it is eating away your liver and probably your important relationships. All of these things are intrinsically and inevitably harmful. The Bible is not. While some people twist its words to their own destruction (you can find that in there too), its true meaning is life.

You are being intellectually dishonest if you think you can score points by citing what people who misuse the Bible have done. People misuse anything and everything for their own purposes, and I think you know that.



Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame. -- Song 8:6
phoenix_fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 02:14 am   #22 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,936
Patrick you are correct about it being an award winning movie (shown in prime time TV) and I would agree. (thanks for correct spelling). I watched it and gave it two thumbs up. It was done with the best "good taste" that one could provide for that historical topic.

Anyway, it was aired on our TV set. And I was very surprised by my daughters interpretation and missunderstanding of the intended purpose of the movie.

Anyway I thought I would return from my vacation away from these debates with a big bang entrance. If King James was still alive I would request he ban more then what he did from those manuscripts but too late for that, anyway they might have tortured me to death for such a suggestion any how.

I wonder if the Jewish mainstream would have accepted Jesus and his teachings if God would protect them today with their current battles over in the "holyland". Hmm? We must remember that Hitler thought that the Jews killed Jesus and that this resulted in Schindler's List and the concentration camps - and that such resulted from Bible reading on the part of some Germans. Too bad Hitler's mama did not "regulate" his biblical readings.

Hope I am not being too "radical sounding" with my impression of history.
Technosoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 02:22 am   #23 (permalink) (top)
another day
slipping sand
 
another day's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,996
As an atheist, hell no.

This is stupid. Nothing should be banned.

And techno, you just don't understand. The bible doesn't cause human cruelty and problems, it's just a popular excuse for it.

Take the most recent episode of South Park...cartman was frozen and reanimated 500 years in the future by some group of people called the Atheist Alliance League or something. Religion has now been banished and everyone in the world is an atheist. Suddenly the base where Cartman is at comes under attack by the Atheist Allegiance Club or whatever. Then they all get overtaken by the Atheist Sea Otters.You get the point. If religion was abolished people would find other reasons to form opposing sides and create conflict. Thus is the nature of the human being. We strive for conflict because conflict leads to change, hopefully good change, but often not. There will never be a time, religion or not, where we will all hold hands and sing songs on a grassy meadow. Take away the bible and people will find something else to make them feel superior and to attack others on, such as racial supremacy etc.
another day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 02:48 am   #24 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,936
Quote:
Quote by: phoenix_fire View Post
Alrighty then. I, many of my friends, and a lot of the people that I look up to read the Bible all the time. We believe it. We are not insane. We do not believe in killing people for any reason. We believe in treating others better than ourselves and in self-sacrifice for those that we love and for complete strangers. We work in the community to help the less fortunate. We are counselors and teachers. We strive toward a standard of excellence because of the Bible. The only true fault that you could agree to in all honesty is that we believe differently from you on matters of cosmology.

I find your comparisons in the poorest of taste and entirely absent of validity. There is no good use of tobacco. It blackens your lungs and teeth and fingers and kills you slowly and painfully. There is no good use of pot (or any other mind-altering chemical). They screw up your head and just might get you killed. While some dietary alcohol may be good for you, if it gets to the point of "booze", then it is eating away your liver and probably your important relationships. All of these things are intrinsically and inevitably harmful. The Bible is not. While some people twist its words to their own destruction (you can find that in there too), its true meaning is life.

You are being intellectually dishonest if you think you can score points by citing what people who misuse the Bible have done. People misuse anything and everything for their own purposes, and I think you know that.
Tobacco was used in the sacred peace pipe for religious purposes and was given to the Natives by the White Buffilo Calf woman who appeared in person with that gift (as an angle of sorts from the Great Spirit).

Noah got drunk on wine and when his child saw his naked and drunk he laughed, so Noah made him a slave of this brother for the rest of his life as punishment for not respecting their papa who got drunk and ran around naked in front of his kids. Noah was favored by the Biblical God. Now if they made a movie about that how would Hollywood be forced to rate it?

Pot is fairly new to our culture relative to mainstream useage, it is a seditive that is used to overcome deadly stress and if used properly it is perhaps better then some presciption drugs used to calm the nerves.

But I agree that missuse of any of those items, and missuse of the Bible by a large number of people, can generate bad side effects and so that is my point. We do not want another culture where millions are tortured and killed for "Witchcraft" which idea was biblically influenced, that would be a bad side effect. Tobacco, wine, pot, are all banned from those who are under age, who are not old enough to make logical choices. Wars are also bad side effects, and the other points I mentioned.

If chruches want to regulate movies and so forth, let them start with the Bible and regulate what is good for children in it, and what is bad for children in it.

Of couse they do make special "Children's Bibles" and so I am not the first person to come up with this idea, it might even be an idea originalted by Christians now that I think about it. But somehow they still fill it up with wars after wars where the Jewish people are always fighting someone. History should have something better to say for her self.

Now Christians are fighting the the "evil" smokers of the weed, using every political and legal weapon they can get their hands on to do so. For the sake the kids? Nay! It is because they must have something evil to fight or overcome to be happy ... so they can feel rewarded and have purpose.

Why don't just chill out a bit and slow down all that bible thumping, freedom is at stake and they got matches ready to burn it down, can you not see this?
Technosoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 02:49 am   #25 (permalink) (top)
zynner
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 817
Ban alcohol and kids want to drink. Ban cigarettes and kids want to smoke. Make sex taboo and they will hump like rabbits.

Probably the best thing to do would be to have every child read the Bible, the Koran, a few other religious books, and a couple of good atheism books, all while they are still very young.

Theism would likely end within a generation or two.

It is indoctrination and fear that keeps people locked into theism.

~ zynner
zynner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 03:34 am   #26 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry
9/11: Inside Job
 
PatrickHenry's Avatar
 
Location: Hawai'i, Big Island
Posts: 10,455
Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul View Post
Hitler thought that the Jews killed Jesus and that this resulted in Schindler's List and the concentration camps - and that such resulted from Bible reading on the part of some Germans. Too bad Hitler's mama did not "regulate" his biblical readings.

Hope I am not being too "radical sounding" with my impression of history.
Welll...:eek:

True that the nazis found excuses for their genocide of the Jews, but that wasn't limited to a misreading of scripture by "Germans." Persecution against Jews had a long and sordid history stretching back at least to the middle ages. Formulated by the Church of Rome. So it wasn't just the Germans, it was everywhere the Catholic Church flourished.

I don't think the Bible is too hard on the Jews for their misdeeds. After all most of it was written by, for, and about the Jews.

True that Jesus was crucified BY THE ROMANS at the instigation of some hypocritical Jewish religious leaders, that doesn't implicate Jews in any way. See, Jesus also said that no one was TAKING his life. Rather, he was laying it down on purpose. So, blaming Jews was ALWAYS wrong, a penetration of the church by the Enemy.


"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams
PatrickHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 03:39 am   #27 (permalink) (top)
Zinkovich
Possibly edible?
 
Zinkovich's Avatar
 
Posts: 783
Strangely enough, the whole Jewish hatred thing was in part started by Martin Luther, the supposed reformer of oppression on part of the church:

Quote:
"

What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people,
the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct,
now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If
we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blaspemy. Thus we
cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the
prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear
of God we must pratice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at
least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves.
Vengenance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has
them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover
with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a
stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of
Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not
condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and
blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated
in the past unknowingly - and I myself was unaware of it - will be
pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect
and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very
nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame
Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were
doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For
they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they
might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will
bring home to them that they are not masters in our country, as they
boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they
incessantly wail and lament about us before God.

Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in
which such idolatry, lies, cursing and blasphemy are taught, be taken
from them. (remainder omitted)

Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on
pain of loss of life and limb. For they have justly forfeited the right
to such an office by holding the poor Jews captive with the saying of
Moses (Deuternomy 17 [:10 ff.]) in which he commands them to obey their
teachers on penalty of death, although Moses clearly adds: "what they
teach you in accord with the law of the Lord." Thoses villains ignore
that. They wantonly employ the poor people's obedience contrary to the
law of the Lord and infuse them with this poison, cursing, and
blasphemy. In the same way the pope also held us captive with the
declaration in Matthew 16 {:18], "You are Peter," etc, inducing us to
believe all the lies and deceptions that issued from his devilish mind.
He did not teach in accord with the word of God, and therefore he
forfeited the righ to teach.

Fifth, I advise that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished
completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside,
since they are not lords, officials, tradesmen, or the like. Let they
stay at home. (...remainder omitted).

Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and
treasure of silver and gold be taken from them and put aside for
safekeeping. The reason for such a measure is that, as said above, they
have no other means of earning a livelihood than usury, and by it they
have stolen and robbed from us all they possess. Such money should now
be used in no other way than the following: Whenever a Jew is sincerely
converted, he should be handed one hundred, two hundred, or three
hundred florins, as personal circumstances may suggest. With this he
could set himself up in some occupation for the support of his poor
wife and children, and the maintenance of the old or feeble. For such
evil gains are cursed if they are not put to use with God's blessing in
a good and worthy cause.

Seventh, I commend putting a flail, an ax, a hoe, a spade, a distaff,
or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and
letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow, as was
imposed on the children of Adam (Gen 3[:19]}. For it is not fitting
that they should let us accursed Goyim toil in the sweat of our faces
while they, the holy people, idle away their time behind the stove,
feasting and farting, and on top of all, boasting blasphemously of
their lordship over the Christians by means of our sweat. No, one
should toss out these lazy rogues by the seat of their pants. " From
Luther's Works, Volume 47: The Christian in Society IV, (Philadelphia:
Fortress Press, 1971). pp 268-293
Makes you cringe, doesn't it?


Side effects may include gastrointestinal homicide, theft of luck, apocalyptic hallucinations, and demonic possession. Please do not soak in milk as doing so will result in death.
Zinkovich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 03:46 am   #28 (permalink) (top)
shield772
110 Dead LEO's in 08
 
shield772's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, WV
Posts: 1,757
Banning/Censorship, I am stunned that anyone of any intellect at all would call for or even suggest such a thing, what an idiotic statement.
shield772 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 03:56 am   #29 (permalink) (top)
JohnMK
Laissez-Faire
 
JohnMK's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Posts: 539
Quote:
Quote by: phoenix_fire View Post
Should I ever have children, I would never do them the disservice of depriving them of the Bible.
I will give my children the benefit of the doubt. If they start taking Harry Potter, the Bible, or anything else too seriously, I wouldn't hesitate to remove it from their library, but they will otherwise not have anything proscribed.


"I can't listen to that much Wagner. I start getting the urge to conquer Poland." - Woody Allen
JohnMK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 05:25 am   #30 (permalink) (top)
PatrickHenry
9/11: Inside Job
 
PatrickHenry's Avatar
 
Location: Hawai'i, Big Island
Posts: 10,455
Quote:
Quote by: Zinkovich View Post
Strangely enough, the whole Jewish hatred thing was in part started by Martin Luther, the supposed reformer of oppression on part of the church:

Makes you cringe, doesn't it?
Mmm...no.
Luther was a proponent of many ideas of the Catholic Church, while opposing others. His hatred for Jews wasn't one of the innovations...

The Church targeting Jews had begun hundreds of years earlier and Luther continued the unrighteous attitude. He deserves honor for his "reforms" and castigation for his lack of insight into God's spirit of love for all people...


"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams
PatrickHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 06:11 am   #31 (permalink) (top)
Kamehameha34
The dingos!
 
Kamehameha34's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,548
Do you think that "promoting violence" and "immoral behaviour" are as offensive as banning the most read book in the world, that many base their lives around?

And I'd hate to see what would happen if the government tried to do this to the Koran.
Kamehameha34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 10:23 am   #32 (permalink) (top)
Kuroko
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 305
Your arguement is moot in many area's.

The content of the book does contain evidence of moral misgivings and wrongs. I believe that was the point.

To speak of adultery is not to encourage it. To give example is not to impact for the example comes with an often well known negative.


Deist: 38%
Scientist: 29%
Debator: 15%
Mathematician: 19%
Kuroko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 2006, 03:54 pm   #33 (permalink) (top)
phoenix_fire
Paladin
 
phoenix_fire's Avatar
 
Location: Narnia
Posts: 4,277
Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul View Post

Why don't just chill out a bit and slow down all that bible thumping, freedom is at stake and they got matches ready to burn it down, can you not see this?
Oh, this is so ironic. Freedom is at stake, so let's ban a book. I think I hear the fire truck coming.



Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame. -- Song 8:6
phoenix_fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 02:41 am   #34 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,936
Hmmm? "For the Lord your Bible is a consuming fire, a jealous God".

Note I made a little change in one of the words, to fit this topic.

Ever here of Joan of Arc, they burned her at the stake because they thought that is what the Bible demanded. No fire trucks rescured her.

Freedom is at stake, just look at all the holy wars being effected in the world nowadays. If the Bible had been banned look ago Joan would not have been fighting a holy war nor would the chruch back then have burned her at the stake for hearing voices from God. Thank your God that we have laws in our country that subdue murder for the sake of some religious opinon or interpretaton of some scripture. But with the right wing Christians in charge those laws might vanish along with other rights that support freedom. The holy wars might consume the whole earth.

The mountian looks nice until it erupts fire from a volcanno ( volconvo?).

It does not take much brainwashing for those goodie-two shoes to start kicking butt. As history has proven over and over.

What is wrong with banning the bad effect caused by a book by teaching kids that some of the things they read in the Bible is very bad advice, and that some stories should not be used to justify those holy wars and other types of cultural bashing?

And teach kids about how people like Bush can use the Bible to manipulate people to do wrong things - politically or otherwise. Before the "few" become too many - which we are close to attaining.

The main commandment of the bible is about following orders and not about freedom of choice. Mixing clay and iron does not make for a good foundation.
Technosoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 07:54 am   #35 (permalink) (top)
Jagged
99 Red Balloons
 
Jagged's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 274
Dude. Parents get to choose their beliefs and what they teach their children. The Bible, itself as a book, does nothing. Its too complex a read for Children to understand and interpret. So youre basically saying ban the Christian Religion and beliefs you think are unhealthy. This is an arrogant question.


Jagged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 10:27 am   #36 (permalink) (top)
faradjahl
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 3
I acknowledge that the Biblbe can indeed be contradictory and against what we think is GOOD, but i really don't see how it instigates harm. What harm has the Bible caused, but dictate the way we should and should not behave? There are indeed many questions one should ask himself about whether or not he should follow what the Bible says, but this is not a reason o ban it. All religions have their background and their base. And the base of Catholicism is the Bible. If we ban the Bible, what is going to replace it? What is Catholicism going to be based on?
faradjahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 11:29 am   #37 (permalink) (top)
twhite22
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 6
the bible should not be banned because, how would we know right from wrong. we would have to believe what our parents or the next person has tolled us. their would be no one to lead, we would all be followers of thr next person who has no idea where he or she is going. to do away with the bible is to do away with life.
twhite22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 11:47 am   #38 (permalink) (top)
Jack
formerly Isherwood
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 14,209
Quote:
So youre basically saying ban the Christian Religion and beliefs you think are unhealthy.
While I don't support banning anything, I can still hope that the worship of the current gods goes the same way as the worship of the Greek gods. We're sufficiently grown up now as a species to let go of our superstitions.
Quote:
how would we know right from wrong.
You wouldn't know without the bible to tell you? Those of us who don't accept the authority of the bible are still living moral lives (for the most part). We're no more perfect or imperfect than anyone else.


The Forum Rules
Radical Atheist
Heathen Queer
Let's agree to respect each others views,
no matter how wrong yours may be.
(Ashleigh Brilliant)
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 12:17 pm   #39 (permalink) (top)
Sergelyne
Sedimentary Rock
 
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 4
Ban The What??!!

I'm sorry but I completely disagree with you this. Ban the Bible?, why because it has violence, war, and sex within its text, well if we were to do that then ban every history textbook in school and while you at that ban every book in the library that has any violence or sex written in it. The Bible is a historic book that gives strong details and accounts of our history and talks about the Jewish sect. You can't ban the Bible because of the reason that you gave which was kind of vague. Basically, the point I'm trying to convey is that banning the Bible is stupid.:rolleyes:
Sergelyne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2006, 12:43 pm   #40 (permalink) (top)
mssexyslim06
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 4
I believe banning the bible would terminate the freedom that americans have to believe in their belifs. Everyone should be able to read or believe in what ever they please, it is a free country...
mssexyslim06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Debt Consolidation Auto Refinance Myspace Codes Books Mortgage Calculator
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10