![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Location: New Zealand Posts: 309 | Here is a long ariticle on fallacies. It's long because it lists most of the common fallacies -- of which there are a lot. They give four definitions of a fallacy: Quote:
I highly recommend reading through the list of fallacies. Most of us here (myself included) rely more on fallacies than on sound argument. | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Location: New Zealand Posts: 309 | A fallacy is (literally) a false statement. When you knowingly make a false statement, it is a lie. When you unwittingly make a false statement, it is not a lie, but is still a fallacy. In philosophy, a fallacy is generally not treated as intentional (there are exceptions to this rule, of course), but an unwitting error. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Igneous Magma Location: New York City Posts: 739 | I had already bookmarked this, I just realized. Of course, I'd have to say that all too often in political debate, fallacies are still unwitting (but entirely sincere) errors... . . . whenever any government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such forms as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. |
| | |