![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) (top) |
| CantSpell Posts: 23 | [quote=gallo;296079] But evolution has been observed. QUOTE] When was evolution at a macro level observed? [CENTER]All one can do is choose that which is the most probable. Refusing to make a choice is the worst choice one can make.[/CENTER] |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) (top) | |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,761 | Quote:
The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) (top) |
| Kuldeep Location: Bhopa, M.P, India Posts: 1,659 | Evolution of sexual reproduction? I feel reproduction must have realised by a specie much later than realising the sexual desire. Sexual desire must not have been much closly connected as close a property as like hunger but some sort of accidental pleasure developement out of messaging / rubbing of sexual organ might have developed the sex desire. Later on, this act out of sex desire might have developed and resulted in reproduction. asexual or sexual reproduction are two natural techniques of reproduction, evloutionist might have answer or working for the answers why and how both developed. But definitely sex desire is inhernt property of any specie like just any other property, hunger for example which act only reproduces accidently. ![]() |
| | |