![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
| Bitchin'! Location: ohio Posts: 210 | i thought the game was officiated fine... I'm sure one of the touchdowns your talking about is the one where ben jumped to the endzone...it was in. I know it, my dad knew it, everyone watching knew it, and the ref knew it. I know refs make bad calls everyonce in a while, but they tend to review things better and make better calls in the superbowl, its one of the biggest events of the year. I knew pitt was gonna win the day they played the colts. Everyone thought they were gonna lose..that game turned around so many times in the end it wasnt even funny, but pitt came out on top. Alot of people didn't think they would beat the broncos,but they did(didnt watch that one)..i can tell you why pittsburgh won: because they wanted it bad enough. It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on peersonal freedom is what it is, okay?. Keep that in mind at all times, thank you. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) | ||
![]() Fire the Liars Location: California Posts: 7,090 | Its criminal. And the gods of Superbowl have been busy scrubbing articles that criticize officiating. I an sure threats of lawsuits have forced this major news outlet to purge dissent: Google News Search for criteria "superbowl officiating" brought this results: Quote:
Because everybody knows, if it isnt in the news, it didnt happen. It will be forgotten by the time they need more money from us for the next con game. Its the profiteers that won the "Big Game". If the Seahawks were allowed to run all over the "Stealers", that would take the partisan crowd out of it early. The crime was committed at WZZM Channel 13 at this time: Quote:
Last edited by gr8fuldaniel; Feb 7, 2006 at 02:35 pm. Reason: typos | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | ||
![]() Gamma-ray burst Location: Nashville Posts: 6,293 | Were you watching the game? That was a TD and everyone agrees it was. We are talking about the BS call early in the game. Remember? EDIT: Talking about this: Quote:
Quote:
Delusion- A persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. (i.e. religion) Shared Last edited by |Chris|; Feb 7, 2006 at 02:50 pm. | ||
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Gamma-ray burst Location: Nashville Posts: 6,293 | Says it all: http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/football/ Quote:
Delusion- A persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. (i.e. religion) Shared | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) (top) |
| Redskins Rule Location: South-Western Virginia Posts: 2,454 | Not being a Seattle nor a Pittsburg fan, this would be my take: Seattle Dude (Jackson?) pushed off like Michael Irvin in the end zone. My eyes and your eyes saw his hand touching Pittsburgh dude and his arm extending while his hand was still touching defender, gaining seperation. That is offensive interference. Sorry. We are not debating how you wish they would call that, we are debating if it is illegal and it is. Did the ball break the plane on Big Ben's dive? I can not say definitively. Was it over the plane when he hit the ground? No. Is that the beginning and the end of the question? No. Did replay provide me with indisputable evidence that when he was in the air that the ball did NOT cross the plane, which is what the rule requires to overturn the ruling on the field? No. If anything, it would be easier for my ego as a Skins fan if the team that defeated my team had gone on to win the whole enchilada. They just did not make as many clutch plays as Pittsburgh did. All I see when I look down, something jumpin' on the ground, Scratchin' dirt, cluckin' in the barnyard - Tell me, could that be you? John Kay |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) (top) | |
| Iceberg Location: Connecticut Posts: 5,691 | Quote:
Now, on to NASCAR! :) :) :) :) :) Brien the Iceberg If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED Posts: 5,021 | Quote:
Oh. That. I didn't even consider that one to be questionable. It was clearly a push off. | |
| | |