![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) |
| Freedom Posts: 6 | Personal Servant: Saint or Not I just have some crazy thoughts in my head, so I'm just going to throw them out there and get everyone's opinion on it. Please don’t get offensive on this subject, they are just opinions. Lets say I kidnapped a 9 year old girl from one family, and a 10 year old boy from another family; enslaving both of them in my dungeon as my personal servants for 20 years. Then lets say I die an then my son take over for 20 more years. Well now the kidnap victims are now age 49 & 50 with kids of their own and of course they are kept lock up too. Well here is the kicker, if my son dies and then my grandson releases the kidnap victims a couple of years after his dad dies; should my grandson be viewed as a saint? I’m just asking this question because this has happened in history and of course if you are smart, you can figure out what I’m talking about. Last edited by anti_drama21; Nov 25, 2005 at 02:10 am. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) (top) | |
| 9/11: Inside Job Location: Hawai'i, Big Island Posts: 10,437 | Quote:
Certainly the one releasing victims of kidnapping and human slavery should be viewed as merciful. Hopefully, he would also help a transition to independent status with gifts of money, livestock or other valuables to recompense the decades of labor extracted from the victims. Still, I don't know if I would consider him a saint. Just a person with a developed conscience, something lacking in his forbears. Where are you going with the question, ad21? "Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." -- John Adams | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Son of X51 Location: San Diego Posts: 3,585 | It's has something to do with Pennsylvania, but i can't remember what. Anyway, the grandson had a few years of slave labor there, so I don't think he's all that saintly. Last edited by Compugasm; Nov 25, 2005 at 02:28 pm. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) |
| Moral Turnip Location: Oregon, US Posts: 2,283 | Please note: this is the same person who started the "Racism in America" thread, which states that the problems the US has with racism would disappear if the races, specifically black and white, were separated. I'm assuming, therefore, that this has to do with the history of chattel slavery in the U.S; my guess would be that we are supposed to find the grandson is not a saint, is merely a man doing the right thing, albeit delayed, and since he waited until after his father was dead to do the freeing, he took the easy way out, and thus isn't such a great guy. I'm guessing the "answer" is that the grandson is Abraham Lincoln, and this is a veiled criticism of his policy of enforced unity under one federal government. But perhaps I'm reading too much into this. Anti_drama 21, the grandson is not a saint; he took advantage of the slaves until it was no longer convenient for him, so his freeing of them is not impressive. Go ahead, dude, tell us the rest. "Would you like some pie, Dr. Stark?" "Science is my pie. Curiosity, my sweet tooth. Knowledge is my candy." |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED: Requested ban Location: Acheron 27 Posts: 1,461 | The big problem is, as I said, if that's the case it's an unfair comparison. In the story it's implied that this captivity was done secretly, which also implies that, if the rest of the people KNEW about it, they would be angry; thus, this kidnapping was considered immoral. In that case the grandson is not heroic but simply doing the right thing. Slavery is a different matter. Many people found it to be perfectly normal and freeing slaves might endanger you. In that case you're going against the norm and endangering yourself which IS an heroic act. Again, the allegory here is skewed. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |