Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

Rive · May 15, 2006, 12:58 pm

This really has nothing to do with this, but i hate it when people bring up pedophelia and compare it to homosexuality, like one is connected to the other. Its just not right.

Kite · May 15, 2006, 01:08 pm

Two men or women loving eachother and having consensual, homosexual intercourse, does NOT equate to A person raping a child. I cannot comprehend how or why people make this leap between two completly unrelated subjects. I suppose its simply agenda-centric logic once again.

RickSp · May 15, 2006, 01:58 pm

Quote:

Quote by: Rive

This really has nothing to do with this, but i hate it when people bring up pedophelia and compare it to homosexuality, like one is connected to the other. Its just not right.

Bigotry is rarely rational.

Kite · May 15, 2006, 02:04 pm

Quote:

Quote by: RickSp

Quote:

Quote by: Rive

This really has nothing to do with this, but i hate it when people bring up pedophelia and compare it to homosexuality, like one is connected to the other. Its just not right.

Bigotry is rarely rational.

Truth++

Zhavric · May 15, 2006, 02:10 pm

Beyond the Slipper Slope fallacy, there's really nothing to debate here.

You show me where a minor is considered a consenting adult. Until then, back to debunking that Christ fellow...

Sonart · May 15, 2006, 02:22 pm

.

We allow consentual sex between loving heterosexual couples...

What's next?!?!?! Equal rights for RAPISTS????? the horror!

.

Zhavric · May 15, 2006, 02:30 pm

Any minute now, they'll let blacks have sex with white women...

.... wait.

Lepid · May 15, 2006, 07:09 pm

Quote:

Quote by: Seeker_Of_Sins

This thread is a fairly good example of why academics shouldnt be law makers, ever. Nice soundbite. Sure you aren't just repeating something you've heard ? The number of people defending paedophilia based on legal arguements or academic arguements is sickening. A 14 year old is a child, and sex with a child is moral issue. Ask any parent if they would want their 14 year old engaging in sexual activity and the answer will be no. Any parent that woiuld consent to their child having sex has moral issues that seriously need addressing. Any person that would argue in favour of a child having sex because of preconcieved ideas on maturity or anything else also has serious moral issues that need addressing.
The other part of this thread I agree with. Homosexuality is a sexual perversion. Paedophilia is a sexual perversion. Are they now? When will opinionated bigots like you actually go and prove it!!By extending rights to one group, you open the door to an extrension of rights to another group. We reap what we sew. Parents are loosing the battle for their children as states and governments take those rights away and replace them with their own lowered morality or political correct political agenda. We now have the ridiculous situation where schools can and do teach things to our children that parents either do not know about or do not agree with.

My daughter can be given birth control at school without my knowledge. She can also arrange an abortion, can arrange alternative accommodation, can explore sexual perversion in class etc, all without my knowledge or consent as a parent hehe...so you have obviously agreed she can engage in sex then? After all this hush-hush situation about abortion means she is being given the green light to sexual actvities with her peer group behind your back!! that must really bother you!Is the state more qualified to raise kids than parents? Does that state have more rights over a child than the childs parents?

Go take your outdated, parochial sexual morals and stick 'em where the light don't shine!!

(or is that an act of forbidden love that also wasn't written in the bible?)

Lepid · May 15, 2006, 07:12 pm

Quote:

Quote by: Kite

Two men or women loving eachother and having consensual, homosexual intercourse, does NOT equate to A person raping a child. I cannot comprehend how or why people make this leap between two completly unrelated subjects. I suppose its simply agenda-centric logic once again.

Implying that every instance of intergenerational sexual activity must be an act of rape!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**Jack** · May 15, 2006, 10:54 pm

Quote:

By extending rights to one group, you open the door to an extrension of rights to another group.

Absolutely right! My gawd, what were we thinking giving rights to anyone. Obviously the only fair solution is to suspend everyone's rights across the board. That ought to shut up those uppity minorities. Let's see what they complain about when no one has any rights.

Quote:

and sex with a child is moral issue

Right! Not a legal issue, a moral issue. And from what I've seen, there isn't a single set of morals on the planet, let alone in this country. Do what you will with your own 14 year old. Your morals should be limited to your sphere of influence...your own family. It's when you try to make everyone live by your morals that we tend to get our backs up.

Rive · May 16, 2006, 08:00 am

Quote:

Quote by: Lepid

Implying that every instance of intergenerational sexual activity must be an act of rape!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

uh... no, i think what he was saying is that comparing homosexuality to raping small children is not a good comparison

Kite · May 16, 2006, 09:50 am

Yes, I thought the word not in all caps would prevent confusion. I guess I was wrong :confused:

Zhavric · May 16, 2006, 11:13 am

Quote:

Quote by: Lepid

Implying that every instance of intergenerational sexual activity must be an act of rape!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sorry, but I felt your use of 42 exclamation points and three smilies really left your post under-emphasized. I'm confident that had you used 45 exclamations and no less than 6 smilies, you would have been taken seriously.

Honest.

Kite · May 16, 2006, 12:06 pm

I concur. Also, you use too many big words. They are make my head hurt.

May 15, 2006, 12:58 pm	#21 (permalink) (top)
Rive little light of mine Location: In the shadows Posts: 127	This really has nothing to do with this, but i hate it when people bring up pedophelia and compare it to homosexuality, like one is connected to the other. Its just not right. what are they gonna do when the lights go down? Without you to guide them all to Zion? What are they gonna do when the rivers overrun? Other than tremble incessantly

May 15, 2006, 01:08 pm	#22 (permalink) (top)
Kite Evil Overlord Location: A Geofront, somewhere in Antarctica Posts: 938	Two men or women loving eachother and having consensual, homosexual intercourse, does NOT equate to A person raping a child. I cannot comprehend how or why people make this leap between two completly unrelated subjects. I suppose its simply agenda-centric logic once again. I know your type. You think, "I'll just get me a costume, rip off the neighborhood kids." Next thing you know, you've got a jet shaped like a skull with lasers on the front! -The Monarch

May 15, 2006, 02:22 pm	#26 (permalink) (top)
Sonart It's simply logical Location: San Diego Posts: 4,333	. We allow consentual sex between loving heterosexual couples... What's next?!?!?! Equal rights for RAPISTS????? the horror! . I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it

May 16, 2006, 09:50 am	#32 (permalink) (top)
Kite Evil Overlord Location: A Geofront, somewhere in Antarctica Posts: 938	Yes, I thought the word not in all caps would prevent confusion. I guess I was wrong :confused: I know your type. You think, "I'll just get me a costume, rip off the neighborhood kids." Next thing you know, you've got a jet shaped like a skull with lasers on the front! -The Monarch

May 16, 2006, 12:06 pm	#34 (permalink) (top)
Kite Evil Overlord Location: A Geofront, somewhere in Antarctica Posts: 938	I concur. Also, you use too many big words. They are make my head hurt. I know your type. You think, "I'll just get me a costume, rip off the neighborhood kids." Next thing you know, you've got a jet shaped like a skull with lasers on the front! -The Monarch

May 15, 2006, 02:10 pm	#25 (permalink) (top)
Zhavric SUSPENDED (1 Week) Posts: 3,571	Beyond the Slipper Slope fallacy, there's really nothing to debate here. You show me where a minor is considered a consenting adult. Until then, back to debunking that Christ fellow...

May 15, 2006, 02:30 pm	#27 (permalink) (top)
Zhavric SUSPENDED (1 Week) Posts: 3,571	Any minute now, they'll let blacks have sex with white women... .... wait.