Volconvo is a debate forum for the discussion of political, religious, and news-based topics.

Impenitent · May 14, 2004, 01:44 pm

Wow, what an indication of your gullibility

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 01:45 pm

Gullibility? Tell me, why did building seven collapse? Good luck.

Impenitent · May 14, 2004, 01:52 pm

it was an evil republican earthquake... bush zapped on his special earthquake ray from the sdi orbiting weapons satellite...

no wait, it was a bomb set by the illuminati for the NWO to ruin your life...

no wait, it was designed to collape when the other buildings fell... the masons who designed and built the building made billions for their secret club...

no wait, it was the vast right wing con... no the vast left wing conspiracy... errrrr....

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 01:56 pm

Wow, that was dumb. Are you going to answer the question or are you going to come up with something you think is funny again?

Mr.Vicchio · May 14, 2004, 02:19 pm

It collapsed because of fire damage and the fact two rather large buildings dropped shit all over it.

Teh building owner was looking for publicity, sympathy, more money something.

The fact is, buildings aren't built to catch fire, and have other airplane damaged buildings fall down on them.

Tho I did read a report of an explosion at Building 7 and one witness supposedly saw a middle eastern man walk into it with a back pack on. Can't find the link to that.

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 02:28 pm

FEMA said it collapsed due to fire (even though that's never happened in all of modern history). Silverstein admitted that it was controlled demolitioned. IF YOU LOOK AT IT, it is obvious it was demolished. It's on the record that there was no bombs in any of the buildings. Silverstien and others (firemen, police) say that there were in building 7. It takes a blow torch to melt steel. Even still, ALL SUPPORTS IN THE BUILDING WOULD HAVE HAD TO MELT AND FAIL AT THE EXACT SAME RATE AT THE EXACT SAME TIME in order for it to implode in on itself. Impossible. The commission hasn't touched it.

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 02:31 pm

Quote:

It collapsed because of fire damage and the fact two rather large buildings dropped shit all over it.

This is not true, although the building was hit with debris, it did not fall "all over it". If you look at the footage, there is plenty of room between where the rubble fell and building 7.

Mr.Vicchio · May 14, 2004, 03:44 pm

roxdog.

Your theory still has the greatest hoel of all. What happened to the 4th plane and passengers.

Since you cannot offer anything more then "I don't know" and "But but but" I must conclude you are willing to belive anything but the obvious. Why? I dunno.

9/11 was the result of 19 arab terrorist, 4 airliners, 3 buildings directly hit, 1 field plowed.

Nothing more.

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 04:15 pm

I never claimed to be able to explain every detail of who, what, when, and where. It's funny, I have more sources to back up my "theory" (never claimed to have a theory, just pointing out documented, anomalous evidence that doesn't get addressed by the dictabox) than you do to explain your conspiracy theory (which is EXACTLY what it is).

Quote:

9/11 was the result of 19 arab terrorist, 4 airliners, 3 buildings directly hit, 1 field plowed.
Nothing more.

Wow, how analytical of you!!! You should be sitting on the commission, not wasting your time denying documented facts. Where is the plane that hit the Pentagon? What did they do with it? And where is the surveillance footage of the 19 men entering the airports? 19....? You sure about that?
That's strange, the TV never told me about this...
Hum?

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 04:20 pm

"Mr Al-Shehri said he has now been interviews by the American authorities, who apologised for the misunderstanding."

dotcoma · May 14, 2004, 04:28 pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Vicchio,
Tho I did read a report of an explosion at Building 7 and one witness supposedly saw a middle eastern man walk into it with a back pack on. Can't find the link to that.

Oh, I get it. If there IS something fishy going on (which there isn't of course, my TV told me so...) it's those "crazy arabs" and definetly NOT white people...

Mr.Vicchio · May 15, 2004, 05:05 am

roxdog, what you are suggesting then is what? Hmm come on play out your full scenario. Lay it all out. Lets hear it.

So far you denounce the muslim aspect and insinuate what?

I have plenty of evidence on my side, Muhammad Atta and 18 other known terrorist crashed 4 aircraft, three into buildings 1 plowed in a field in Pennsylvania.

I really think you should work for CAIR, seriously.

dotcoma · May 15, 2004, 03:02 pm

I don't know what CAIR is. I'm sure you're making a joke so I'll pretend to think it's funny. You have yet to produce the "plenty of evidence" on "your side" (you mean THEIR explanation) that can't be easily debunked. I just posted an article where US authorities admit that they aren't quite sure about the identification of the "19 terrorists" (if they aren't sure, how do they know it was 19???). There is only evidence of three planes. This is a fact. Why don't you write the DOD and see why they won't show us the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I denounce the Muslim connection and insinuate that there is another explanation and that the establishment is appearing as if it is covering the truth.

Mr.Vicchio · May 15, 2004, 03:28 pm

You keep syaing only evidence of three planes..

Your right guy, that fourth plane, full of passengers just up and dissappeared.

dotcoma · May 15, 2004, 04:07 pm

Keep cracking jokes in the mist of serious subjects. Where is the plane that hit the Pentagon. What did they do with it? Obviously they would have pieced it back together like they've done with every other plane crash. Where is the plane? And the damage done to the Pentagon is completely inconsistant with the manner in which Pentagon officials say the plane hit. The media picked up on it the day before the anthrax killed the guy that took pictures of the Bush twins drunk and on top of each other. I haven't heard it talked about since.

Impenitent · May 15, 2004, 04:12 pm

they hid the plane in area 51 right next to the ufos

dotcoma · May 15, 2004, 04:32 pm

Actually, they hid it next to your brain because they knew no one would be able to find it...

Mr.Vicchio · May 15, 2004, 05:23 pm

Roxdog, the plane disentigrated when it slammed the pentagon. I know this might take a leap of faith for you.. but the pentagon is one of the most solid structures in the world, and an airplan, full of fuel slamming into a concrete and steel strucure tends to do that.

By your logic, where are the peices of the planes that hit the WTC Buildings? They haven't reconstruced them. Where are those parts huh?

dotcoma · May 15, 2004, 05:31 pm

Quote:

an airplan, full of fuel slamming into a concrete and steel strucure tends to do that.

First off, the Pentagon claims that the plane hit the ground first AND THEN it hit the Pentagon. And tends to do what? Disintegrate? Are you fucking kidding? And enough of the "full of fuel" bullshit. Most planes are full of fuel. That's how planes work. Funny, why don't they just come out and say, "um the plane...um..disintagrated". Why don't they just say that. They haven't. Where is the plane?

Mr.Vicchio · May 15, 2004, 07:12 pm

Where aree the two planes that hit thw WTC?? Huh where did they go?? Where are the parts! Teh unbelieving want to know!

Geez dude, you need to have a clue on how a crash works and not read the rantings of french rabble. Yes I know where you got he "No plane hit the pentagon" thing from.

You keep on about no plane hit the pentagon, but you have no plausible explination for the dissappearnce of the 4th airliner.

But you want to know where the fourth plane is... most of the parts that survived were in the Pentagon... wow. I know a major surprise but its true!

May 14, 2004, 01:44 pm	#101 (permalink) (top)
Impenitent Hot Lava Posts: 1,859	Wow, what an indication of your gullibility "I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..." insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results...

May 14, 2004, 01:52 pm	#103 (permalink) (top)
Impenitent Hot Lava Posts: 1,859	it was an evil republican earthquake... bush zapped on his special earthquake ray from the sdi orbiting weapons satellite... no wait, it was a bomb set by the illuminati for the NWO to ruin your life... no wait, it was designed to collape when the other buildings fell... the masons who designed and built the building made billions for their secret club... no wait, it was the vast right wing con... no the vast left wing conspiracy... errrrr.... "I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..." insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results...

May 14, 2004, 02:19 pm	#105 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	It collapsed because of fire damage and the fact two rather large buildings dropped shit all over it. Teh building owner was looking for publicity, sympathy, more money something. The fact is, buildings aren't built to catch fire, and have other airplane damaged buildings fall down on them. Tho I did read a report of an explosion at Building 7 and one witness supposedly saw a middle eastern man walk into it with a back pack on. Can't find the link to that. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?

May 14, 2004, 03:44 pm	#108 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	roxdog. Your theory still has the greatest hoel of all. What happened to the 4th plane and passengers. Since you cannot offer anything more then "I don't know" and "But but but" I must conclude you are willing to belive anything but the obvious. Why? I dunno. 9/11 was the result of 19 arab terrorist, 4 airliners, 3 buildings directly hit, 1 field plowed. Nothing more. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?

May 15, 2004, 05:05 am	#112 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	roxdog, what you are suggesting then is what? Hmm come on play out your full scenario. Lay it all out. Lets hear it. So far you denounce the muslim aspect and insinuate what? I have plenty of evidence on my side, Muhammad Atta and 18 other known terrorist crashed 4 aircraft, three into buildings 1 plowed in a field in Pennsylvania. I really think you should work for CAIR, seriously. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?

May 14, 2004, 01:45 pm	#102 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	Gullibility? Tell me, why did building seven collapse? Good luck.

May 14, 2004, 01:56 pm	#104 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	Wow, that was dumb. Are you going to answer the question or are you going to come up with something you think is funny again?

May 14, 2004, 02:28 pm	#106 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	FEMA said it collapsed due to fire (even though that's never happened in all of modern history). Silverstein admitted that it was controlled demolitioned. IF YOU LOOK AT IT, it is obvious it was demolished. It's on the record that there was no bombs in any of the buildings. Silverstien and others (firemen, police) say that there were in building 7. It takes a blow torch to melt steel. Even still, ALL SUPPORTS IN THE BUILDING WOULD HAVE HAD TO MELT AND FAIL AT THE EXACT SAME RATE AT THE EXACT SAME TIME in order for it to implode in on itself. Impossible. The commission hasn't touched it.

May 14, 2004, 04:20 pm	#110 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	"Mr Al-Shehri said he has now been interviews by the American authorities, who apologised for the misunderstanding."

May 15, 2004, 03:02 pm	#113 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	I don't know what CAIR is. I'm sure you're making a joke so I'll pretend to think it's funny. You have yet to produce the "plenty of evidence" on "your side" (you mean THEIR explanation) that can't be easily debunked. I just posted an article where US authorities admit that they aren't quite sure about the identification of the "19 terrorists" (if they aren't sure, how do they know it was 19???). There is only evidence of three planes. This is a fact. Why don't you write the DOD and see why they won't show us the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. I denounce the Muslim connection and insinuate that there is another explanation and that the establishment is appearing as if it is covering the truth.

May 15, 2004, 03:28 pm	#114 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	You keep syaing only evidence of three planes.. Your right guy, that fourth plane, full of passengers just up and dissappeared. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?

May 15, 2004, 04:07 pm	#115 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	Keep cracking jokes in the mist of serious subjects. Where is the plane that hit the Pentagon. What did they do with it? Obviously they would have pieced it back together like they've done with every other plane crash. Where is the plane? And the damage done to the Pentagon is completely inconsistant with the manner in which Pentagon officials say the plane hit. The media picked up on it the day before the anthrax killed the guy that took pictures of the Bush twins drunk and on top of each other. I haven't heard it talked about since.

May 15, 2004, 04:12 pm	#116 (permalink) (top)
Impenitent Hot Lava Posts: 1,859	they hid the plane in area 51 right next to the ufos "I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..." insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results...

May 15, 2004, 04:32 pm	#117 (permalink) (top)
dotcoma Volcanic Erupter Posts: 3,154	Actually, they hid it next to your brain because they knew no one would be able to find it...

May 15, 2004, 05:23 pm	#118 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	Roxdog, the plane disentigrated when it slammed the pentagon. I know this might take a leap of faith for you.. but the pentagon is one of the most solid structures in the world, and an airplan, full of fuel slamming into a concrete and steel strucure tends to do that. By your logic, where are the peices of the planes that hit the WTC Buildings? They haven't reconstruced them. Where are those parts huh? Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?

May 15, 2004, 07:12 pm	#120 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335	Where aree the two planes that hit thw WTC?? Huh where did they go?? Where are the parts! Teh unbelieving want to know! Geez dude, you need to have a clue on how a crash works and not read the rantings of french rabble. Yes I know where you got he "No plane hit the pentagon" thing from. You keep on about no plane hit the pentagon, but you have no plausible explination for the dissappearnce of the 4th airliner. But you want to know where the fourth plane is... most of the parts that survived were in the Pentagon... wow. I know a major surprise but its true! Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?