Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Miscellaneous


This topic in Miscellaneous is about Gang will target Minuteman vigil on Mexico border.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 30, 2005, 04:40 pm   #21 (permalink) (top)
Lou Minotti
BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
 
Posts: 1,337
The entities manipulating these said governments are evil. If you can't accept or see that you simply have your eyes closed (or maybe "heavily misguided"). There are quite a few public groups that openly call for world government. Ever read None Dare Call it Treason? No? And you call yourself a Republican? What you call anti-American, the Founding Fathers' would mostly likely call welcome and justified dissent. The only one that is deluded is you.

Last edited by Lou Minotti; Mar 30, 2005 at 05:27 pm.
Lou Minotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2005, 06:01 pm   #22 (permalink) (top)
asterix404
Igneous Magma
 
Posts: 257
Alright realy fast and no spell checker this time sorry guys. The real question to me is who would win ex special forces and DEA vs drug dealers since they are the people who really would be the only issue here. I mean yea get the milatary of mexico to round up some minutemen whatever you want. I still don't think that 6000 troops vs a handful of men no matter how great, armed with handguns would really have a shot. The funny thing that no one understands is that we need the migrant workers badly since do you know any americans that would bother to pick veggies... and the second I say that people jump down my throught until I see in the back room of a kitchen a mexican or other hispanic cleaning and you talk with the owner and say, hes the bast damn worker I have and never complains. They have to exist in this country and there are too many of them and they are too cunning to be stoped by a butnch of people with handguns. Nice try but alas it is doomed.

As far as gringo goes... people in south america use it to define anyone whos first launguage is english. It's more of a note in the culture then a racists slurr like nigger is in the US refering to a black person. It's a different use in a different culture. Whatever... this shit that I have seen on these threads the "anti gringos" should really just loosen up and dont take it too personally.
asterix404 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2005, 06:26 pm   #23 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio
Navy Veteran
 
Mr.Vicchio's Avatar
 
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,335
asterix, you are correct about gringos.. but it is also a slur, and he admitted it as such. That's where the issue went.

Sorry.

And the thing is, no one is saying immigrants shouldn't be here. It's the METHOD of how they get here that is the issue.


Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?
Mr.Vicchio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2005, 06:41 pm   #24 (permalink) (top)
Lou Minotti
BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
 
Posts: 1,337
Amen. As a Libertarian I am all for legal (& realistic) immigration. And the word IMMIGRATION itself means much more than simply opening the door. But this isn't immigration. It is an INVASION. No other way to define it.
Lou Minotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 1, 2005, 01:28 pm   #25 (permalink) (top)
Logjam
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,153
I'm in agreement with Mr. Vicchio. I'd like to see some good old fashioned, hard nosed fisticuffs between us and Mexico. It's about time that we settled this illegal allien mess. Looks like a fight is the only way that we are going to achieve any real solution.

People who sneak across our boarder should understand that they do it at great personal risk. If their cops come across with them to protect them then we should kill them.

I'm tired of messing around.
Logjam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2005, 12:23 pm   #26 (permalink) (top)
Anti Imm
Sedimentary Rock
 
Posts: 2
It is very clear that the vast majority of Americans have had it with illegal Mexicans in their country. You are draining us, while, at the same time, openly expressing your contempt and even hatred toward us.

You come here because conditions in your own country are poor; we know, we hear it day after day. But why don't you start at the root of the problem and demand better from your own government? Are you so weak and such collective cowards that you will allow your government to continue to ignore your needs?

Please hear us: we don't want more illegal immigration. We have our own problems to deal with, we don't need yours as well. Have some dignity: change your country instead of running like cowards to your neighbor's county.
Anti Imm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2005, 02:39 am   #27 (permalink) (top)
rmnunez
Volcanic Erupter
 
rmnunez's Avatar
 
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,772
Vic, I never advocated the reference to gringoes for its offensive slurring value, I explicitly stated this term was deemed best because its gringan favoured alternative (American) was found inapt.

As for objections to the METHOD of immigration (illegally), before advocating changing Mexican practices it might make sense to review how gringan ones affect these. Consider the basics of undocumented immigration; overwhelmingly from Mexico, frequent, voluminous, recurring and employment related.

There are 2 gringan practices which obviously could be changed to reduce undocumented immigration; first, make it more illegal to employ undocumenteds and punish their employers more severely; second, streamline and accelerate the issuance of permits for temporary workers who are not really migrating.
rmnunez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2005, 04:13 am   #28 (permalink) (top)
Mr.Vicchio
Navy Veteran
 
Mr.Vicchio's Avatar
 
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,335
Whatever man, I tried to read your post, but you insist on finding ways to slip "gringo" into every sentance you can... even by MAKING up words....

What the hell is gringan?

Lemme look it up
Quote:
Web Results 1 - 1 of 1 for definition gringan. (0.26 seconds)

Volconvo.com - Iraq "a cause for extremists"
... like bishops perfectly acceptable definition and love talking in circles. ...
I hear "pro-unification" North Koreans also take a dim view of gringan ...
www.volconvo.com/forums/ showthread.php?t=4106&page=4 - 81k - Cached - Similar pages
GET IT yet? You are now MAKING up a word instead of jsut accepting the truth. This is an english language based board, and continued use of racially based labels is INSULTING. And I feel there is a VERY strong case to be made that you are intentionally doing so out of spite.


Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route?
Mr.Vicchio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2005, 04:43 am   #29 (permalink) (top)
Matt W
Moderator
 
Matt W's Avatar
 
Location: Reading, UK.
Posts: 6,800
Quote:
explicitly stated this term was deemed best because its gringan favoured alternative (American) was found inapt.
And we explicity stated that it was insulting, and offered alternatives. Haven't you gotten over this yet?


I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered.

-George Best, on being asked what he did with his footballing fortunes.
Matt W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2005, 12:54 pm   #30 (permalink) (top)
Gorgo
BANNED-Warned multiple times about instigating. User then reported topics multiple times to mess with staff.
 
Posts: 4,412
Quote:
Quote by: The Dunedan
stop this nonsense
That's insulting to call what someone says "nonsense."
Gorgo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2005, 01:26 pm   #31 (permalink) (top)
Cephus
Hot Lava
 
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 2,265
Quote:
Quote by: rcne
I know Fox will not allow these gangs free access to the border - right? If not I think the gang may start a border war.
Like he won't allow all the illegal aliens flooding north across the border now? His entire tactic for improving Mexico is to throw out the poor and undesirable. Anyone that stops the flow northward is causing trouble for Fox.

Quote:
Why you ask - do you really think that if they cross the border attack, then skip back across the border - we won't follow.
Because Bush is a pussy and is terrified of offending Vincente Fox.

Quote:
Unless of course if the Mexican army picks them up first - and puts them in one of those fine Mexican Jails.
Except that most of the Mexican army is already on the take from the drug cartels and will probably help them. Heck, half of these "hitmen" are probably ex Mexican military anyhow.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if this turns into a shooting war. I'll also not be surprised if Bush starts punishing Americans who are doing *HIS* job on the border.


Jesus loves me? No thanks, I don't swing that way.

Blog Me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2005, 09:58 pm   #32 (permalink) (top)
letxa2000
Molten Ash
 
Posts: 65
Quote:
Quote by: Cephus
Because Bush is a pussy and is terrified of offending Vincente Fox.
Why? Why would Bush be terrified of offending the president of Mexico?

Quote:
Except that most of the Mexican army is already on the take from the drug cartels and will probably help them.
Actually, that's not true. If you want to adjust your statement to say "most of Mexican police is already on the take", sure, I'll agree with you. But their military is surprisingly non-corrupted. Not perfect, no, but neither is our Border Patrol considering the whole Douglas NM scandal.

Quote:
Heck, half of these "hitmen" are probably ex Mexican military anyhow.
I don't have any proof one way or the other on that, and I doubt you do, either. But most of the Mexican military are young Mexicans that are simply fulfilling a two-year obligation to serve in the military. If they're lucky, most of them will leave the military not being afraid to hold an automatic weapon. Most of them probably even shot one a few times. But highly trained military "hitmen?" That describes an extremely small fraction of the Mexican military.

Quote:
I wouldn't be at all surprised if this turns into a shooting war. I'll also not be surprised if Bush starts punishing Americans who are doing *HIS* job on the border.
I would hope he would. The border should be defended, but not by unlicensed vigilantes. If they want to defend the border, they should join the Border Patrol.
letxa2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2005, 11:35 pm   #33 (permalink) (top)
rmnunez
Volcanic Erupter
 
rmnunez's Avatar
 
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,772
Last I heard the gangs which were to target minute men were the "Maras". The Mara Salvatrucha gangs are originally from Los Angeles. In the 80s the US expelled a large number of them who came from Guatemala and points south and were in the US illegally. The sudden influx of hundreds of convicted criminal gang members back in their places of origin resulted in their carving out areas of control in the primary local criminal activity; drug smuggling. Now the Maras are well-established across the US. One of the gang bosses, incarcerated on a drug-related conviction near Los Angeles, called on fellow gang members to attack the vigilantes in solidarity with the Mexican undocumenteds. Any gang members attacking minute men will be coming from Los Angeles, not crossing the border from Mexico. Alas, the call was made when the vigilantes first deployed but I haven't heard of any casualties among them, so it seems it was just a bluff.

The Mexican military is corrupt and the forces deployed for drug interdiction at the border are the most corrupt, but its a problem with the upper levels in the officer corps, not something that trickles down to the foot soldier.

Last edited by rmnunez; Jun 26, 2005 at 11:37 pm.
rmnunez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 12:27 am   #34 (permalink) (top)
tinybear
Volcanic Erupter
 
tinybear's Avatar
 
Location: Hong Kong (for now)
Posts: 7,111
So who says we should throw open the borders? Who still wonders why illegal immigration is such a hot topic in the US?
tinybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 01:20 am   #35 (permalink) (top)
rmnunez
Volcanic Erupter
 
rmnunez's Avatar
 
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,772
tiny, the overwhelming majority of those crossing without the proper formalities are not criminals. The overwhelming majority of the undocumenteds in the US are not criminals other than for their irregular entry, they are just laborers trying to pass unnoticed.

If the US had adequate procedures to handle the seasonal migrant workers, these wouldn't be resorting to smugglers and illicit crossings. If it weren't regular practice for undocumenteds to be smuggled across, it would be more difficult to do this. With adequate procedures for seasonal migrant workers, criminals travelling to the US would be more easily detected and kept out.
rmnunez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 10:10 am   #36 (permalink) (top)
Cephus
Hot Lava
 
Location: Redlands, CA
Posts: 2,265
Quote:
Quote by: rmnunez
tiny, the overwhelming majority of those crossing without the proper formalities are not criminals. The overwhelming majority of the undocumenteds in the US are not criminals other than for their irregular entry, they are just laborers trying to pass unnoticed.
Of course they are, by definition! If they cross the border illegally, they are commiting a crime and are thus, CRIMINALS! 100% of *ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE CRIMINALS!*

Quote:
If the US had adequate procedures to handle the seasonal migrant workers, these wouldn't be resorting to smugglers and illicit crossings. If it weren't regular practice for undocumenteds to be smuggled across, it would be more difficult to do this. With adequate procedures for seasonal migrant workers, criminals travelling to the US would be more easily detected and kept out.
Regardless, and whether or not the US needs legal migrant workers or not is the subject for another thread, that doesn't change the fact that these people are here illegally and need to be sent back. Just because it is difficult to do something doesn't mean we should all give up and not do it. Illegal aliens are killing the economy of the border states.


Jesus loves me? No thanks, I don't swing that way.

Blog Me! http://BitchSpot.JadeDragonOnline.com
Cephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 12:35 pm   #37 (permalink) (top)
Lou Minotti
BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
 
Posts: 1,337
Quote:
tiny, the overwhelming majority of those crossing without the proper formalities are not criminals.
"Without the proper formalities"???? This is pure doublespeak. These people (with the help of Fox's government and others) are violating Americas rights as a sovereign nation. We're on to you....

"For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada"
Lou Minotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 01:21 pm   #38 (permalink) (top)
RickSp
Volcanic Erupter
 
RickSp's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,589
Quote:
Quote by: Lou Minotti
"Without the proper formalities"???? This is pure doublespeak. These people (with the help of Fox's government and others) are violating Americas rights as a sovereign nation. We're on to you....
Those monsters, willing to work hard for the wages offered, at jobs that Americans won't take. How dare they? And violating our sovereignty too! We've got to protect the Fatherland, err Homeland, against such hard workers, err invaders. Yah that's right, invaders who pick lettuce and work construction. Dangerous bastards all.


Rick

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." Sinclair Lewis
RickSp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 01:36 pm   #39 (permalink) (top)
Lou Minotti
BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
 
Posts: 1,337
Nice buzzwords and strawmen. "Jobs Americans won't take"...please.
Lou Minotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 27, 2005, 01:37 pm   #40 (permalink) (top)
Lou Minotti
BANNED (Multiple usernames after another ban)
 
Posts: 1,337
Quote:
Dangerous bastards all.
"For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada"

Quote:
And violating our sovereignty too! We've got to protect the Fatherland, err Homeland, against such hard workers, err invaders.
You One Worlders crack me up. You use jokes, innuendoes and straw men but whenever you have to actually explain yourself or offer a solution you end up getting laughed at.

Quote:
Fatherland, err Homeland
Oh, so I'm a Nazi for suggesting unsecure borders adds does nothing for security...

"For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada"

Last edited by Lou Minotti; Jun 27, 2005 at 01:46 pm.
Lou Minotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, KFUPM ePrints, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Beauty Salons, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Virtual pet Mortgages MPAA MySpace Images WoW Gold
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10