![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #122 (permalink) (top) | |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335 | Quote:
Since there is no such word as gringan, this is nothing MORE then using the slur. Bigots have no place on this board. Post reported to the authorites. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | |
| | |
| | #123 (permalink) (top) | |
| Molten Ash Posts: 29 | Calm down guys -- his ideals are indefensible enough without having to resort to wounded rhetoric about his stupid choice of words.Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #124 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335 | Joe, it woudn't be a huge deal if he didn't go to such lengths to provoke us. He's an admitted Bigot and the word "gringo" is a slur, he knws it, admitted it and was called out. Now he's making up words... Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
| | |
| | #126 (permalink) (top) |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335 | That's up to Sean, just report and explain your complaint Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |
| | |
| | #128 (permalink) (top) | |||
| Volcanic Erupter Location: Mexico City Posts: 4,772 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
At this point there could be anywhere between 10 and 20 million undocumenteds of Mexican birth living in the US. These people have shown they have no intent to become gringoes, despite qualifying by tenure and even birth in many cases. The gringoes deny them services and rights, they reject these attitudes but remain. Now Mexican politicians are realizing the potential value of this constituency, anyone who calls for legalizing undocumenteds on the campaign trail in Mexico automatically enjoys wholehearted support from his countrymen in the US. I honestly doubt the US could survive if they got rid of up to 20 million undocumenteds. I know they have the resources, technology and manpower to actually "get rid" of that many, but wonder who would fill their places? I know the average gringo doesn't want to face an average 20% hike in the costs of every service and most products consumed and I doubt that cost could be absorbed by private business or the government together. | |||
| | |
| | #130 (permalink) (top) |
| former overlord Location: New York Posts: 2,383 | rmnunez, I have warned you before, and you even agreed to stop using the word. Please stop. If I get more reports I am going to have to issue a warning, and consider a topic move. Oh and Bishop, do not put words in my mouth. I never told you to "deal with it". How about actually reading what I had to say in the boiler-room thread on it. |
| | |
| | #131 (permalink) (top) |
| moderat-e/o-r Location: boston Posts: 11,184 | i've occassionally been a fan of mining the border. once the tacos start getting their limbs blown off, maybe then they'll think twice before they invade our country. too bad our sack of shit politicians have no interest in defending the border - isn't that one of the most basic functions of government??? |
| | |
| | #133 (permalink) (top) |
| former overlord Location: New York Posts: 2,383 | Because I asked you to do what you agreed to do? The term is offensive to a majority here, and you continue to use it. When I asked you nicely to stop, and even avoided giving you warning points, you run off? No comprimise? |
| | |
| | #135 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Location: Mexico City Posts: 4,772 | Late yesterday Mexican congress approved a law Fox ratified today which will allow about 4 million Mexicans working in the US (mostly undocumenteds) to vote in the presidential elections next year. Fox’s PAN party supports the legislation out of principle, the old PRI supports it with lectoral interests and the PRD, which bills itself as the “socially responsible” (leftish) party opposed the bill. The 28th, appropriately a day of special observance for the devotees of St. Jude, patron of lost causes, Mexican expatriates obtained a long unfairly denied right. Many wonder how 'Americanized' Mexicans might vote, my estimation is more conservative than their compatriots at home (I think this must be why the PRD opposed the law). PRI and PAN already have proselitizing offices in several major US cities with large Mexican communities and one of the PRI candidates is said to have US feminist money backing. The PAN is alleged to have raised substantial contributions north of the border in Fox’s campaign. So these 2 parties see a constituency, are cultivating ties with them and can give them a voice in Mexican politics. The PRD whose best known figure is Mexico City’s mayor (stepping down the 29th to campaign for the presidency and billed as the most likely to succeed in 2006) opposed from the beginning any initiative to give Mexicans in the US the same rights US citizens in Mexico already enjoy. They said the elections had to be at polling stations, that special ids would be needed, that there wasn’t enough time to train the people to man these consular voting booths, they highlighted the potential for fraud, the complications with illiterates, difficulties in arranging for interministerial coordination between those controlling the diplomats and those staffing the polling stations, the arrangements needed to do this in compliance with international law, concerns over proselitizing and fundraising abroad. It is difficult to see how a party that campaigns as working-class, socially responsible, concerned over the discriminated, indigenous, marginalized, disenfranchised and poor, can oppose on any grounds efforts that seek to bring them the rights their more fortunate compatriots at home enjoy (who didn’t have to risk life and limb in a dangerous and illicit enterprise to feed their families). The obstacles they raised have been addressed and the legislation is a “work in progress”, Mexicans will vote overseas by mail, existing national id will be sufficient, fundraising and proselitizing are within discrete jurisdictions of federal electoral institutions. Hopefully Mexicans in the US will remember come election time who stood with them in their arduous struggle and reject the PRD’s bid. Last edited by rmnunez; Jun 29, 2005 at 09:49 pm. |
| | |
| | #136 (permalink) (top) | |||||
| Volcanic Erupter Location: Mexico City Posts: 4,772 | Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() > Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by rmnunez; Jul 1, 2005 at 02:51 am. | |||||
| | |
| | #137 (permalink) (top) | |
| Volcanic Erupter Location: Mexico City Posts: 4,772 | There will be clashes for prominence and recognition between hispanics and blacks in the US for a bit now as the hispanics reach majority status (by 2010 according to the US Census). I anticipate a Mexican president in the Oval Office within 3 elections, it will be interesting to see what is done with Affirmative Action then. Quote:
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinte...projtab01a.pdf http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/ | |
| | |
| | #139 (permalink) (top) | |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,335 | Quote:
To be eligble to be President one must be natural born. I.E. an American. He doesn't want to admit that there are latino's in this world that don't consider themselves Mexican. Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | |
| | |