Impeach Bush

[Sonart]

What he meant by that was Kerry's plan to keep America safe SUCKs and we'd be gaurenteed another attack if he is elected - not that Kerry was going to have his own terrorists launch another attack...please..

Well I can see that's definitely not the tactic of fear and is well grounded in factual evidence. -Pfffft!-

In order to impeach Bush, his written (or/and under the oath) testimony is needed. It would never happen. Exception :

No, what we'd need to impeach Bush is for the Republican House to impeach him and the Republican Senate to try him. THAT will never happen. Bush could murder someone over a drug deal and they wouldn't impeach him. Had Kerry won the election, however, I suspect we'd see a campaign for impeachment working through Congress before he took office. (like the 'Impeach Clinton' bumper stickers I saw immediately after Clinton took office) Illegal lane changing, overdue library books, whatever, the VRWC would find something to pin on Kerry.

Why do you think the first thing the GOP congress did after Bush was elected was to outlaw the Special Prosecutor? Impeachment is a political process.

[riciglia1]

You want to know something funny, If Bush sets foot in Canada, hell be arrested and charged with war crimes. So yes i would impeach him if i could.

[riciglia1]

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...//www.rabble.ca

[Rainbow]

Originally posted by Sonart, No, what we'd need to impeach Bush is for the Republican House to impeach him and the Republican Senate to try him. THAT will never happen.

You reached the final procedure ? :-)))
I never thought it may even be taken under any consideration at all, unless Republicans are politically insane.

[Rainbow]

Originally posted by riciglia1, http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...//www.rabble.ca

Few sentences out that whole article :

War crimes also specifically include any breach of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, such as torture, degradation, wilfully depriving prisoners of war of their rights "to a fair and regular trial," launching attacks "in the knowledge that such attacks will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians" and deportation of persons from an area under occupation

It seems that Canada is a land where a law is being shaped to the state of (its) perfection. In other words : "Paradise" :-)))

[Sonart]

Originally posted by Rainbow You reached the final procedure ? :-))) I never thought it may even be taken under any consideration at all, unless Republicans are politically insane.

Have you been reading my posts? I've always understood the procedure, which is why I've always thought this thread was pointless. Impeachment will never happen.

Impeachment is a political process, which is why Clinton could be impeached for lying about an affair, yet Bush's gross incompetence and negligence -- misleading our nation into a war by mistake, based on the false information from an iranian spy that Bush's own intelligence community warned was a scuzbag, based on false assumptions that we'd be pulling out our troops in six months, despite warnings by his intelligence, his State department and his senior military, exploding the deficit, killing and maiming American troops by the thousands, with no end in sight -- is praised by his party.

You find this amusing?

[OberonDOtherseid]

I'm still trying to figure out who is the villain here. On one hand I can pour through these threads and see blame shifted onto our incompetent intelligence, in that post the intelligence is the sad and lonely sage that big bad Bush just wouldn't listen to. Which one is it? Clinton was asked a pretty straight forward question, "did you let Monica Lewinsky suck you off in the oval office?"....This is a very simple question that bears no deep concentration and he chose "No, I didn't".


Allow me this once to assume and make assertions like the majority of my fellow Volconvo political adversaries and say "If he can lie about a blowjob, what else did he lie about?". Not that it matters to me at this point and God Bless Billy bob if he can get a little trim, but this place is riddled with comments like that, I just want to fit in. :)

[gr8fuldaniel]

It just shows me how utterly absurd our government is.

The Reps. want us to believe Blow Jobs are bad and the Massacre of millions of innocent people is good, that we are actually liberating them.

Who really believes that line of bullshit? What kind of retards do they take us for. And if you support and voted for this current Admin, you have the blood of innocents to your credit.

Our leaders are guilty of hegemony, Imperialism, theft, murder, Geneva Conv. Violations, International Human Rights.etc.

But that blow job was really nasty. Did she ever get that stain out. Impeachment is too good for him.

[Rainbow]

Originally posted by Sonart, I've always thought this thread was pointless. Impeachment will never happen.

That is exactly my view as well.

[Scribbler1]

Originally posted by gr8fuldaniel, It just shows me how utterly absurd our government is. The Reps. want us to believe Blow Jobs are bad and the Massacre of millions of innocent people is good, that we are actually liberating them.

It's not that, but the Republicans thought they had a slam dunk way of removing Clinton from office. They knew they couldn't get him on the actual sex, so they focused on the lying about it part. They knew the sheep would be easily manipulated into supporting action against a liar without considering he lied in response to a question which should never have been asked in the first place
Impeachment used to be seen as the FINAL action against a politician. The very probabiity of impeachment caused Nixon to actually RESIGN the presidency. Clinton, however weathered it like a mild head cold, and the Republican party has sunk so low as to be worthy of decertification as a political party. Let conservatives start another party and leave the morons in charge of the GOP behind.

I feel badly for the intelligent, realistic and genuinely sincere Conservatives, I really do. They can't in good conscience join the Democrat party and the only alternative is a party which has been hijacked by narrow-minded, far right-wing, bible-thumping power brokers.

[Texans 4 Furors]

Originally posted by Rainbow,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rainbow,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-Sonart, I've always thought this thread was pointless. Impeachment will never happen.

That is exactly my view as well.[/b][/quote]
It won't happen because of people that think like this.

[Sonart]

Originally posted by Oberon+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Oberon)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>I can pour through these threads and see blame shifted onto our incompetent intelligence,[/b]

Blame is being shifted onto our "incompetent intelligence" by those who blindly support Bush, yet it was our "incompetent intelligence" who were unclear whether or not Iraq had WMD, who were highly sceptical about Bush's favorite Iranian spy, Ahmed Chalabi, and his merry band of defectors, and who were unequivical about the disastrous potential of occupying Iraq.

Originally posted by Oberon@ Allow me this once to assume and make assertions like the majority of my fellow Volconvo political adversaries and say "If he can lie about a blowjob, what else did he lie about?".

Not much, apparently. Conservatives were out to destroy Clinton's presidency from the day he took office, dredging up one unfounded 'scandal' after another -- whitewater, filegate, travelgate, Hillarygate, Fostergate, Chinagate, yada, yada, yada. And in seven years of trying they found nothing that he'd done wrong until they were able to perjury trap him into lying about what most men would lie about... an affair.

<!--QuoteBegin-Texans
It won't happen because of people that think like this. [/quote]You wanna explain that?

[Technosoul]

Another "distraction in action" trick by Republicans to talk about Clinton to change the topic away from the impeachment of Bush topic.

[Texans 4 Furors]

Speaking of distractions... They both deserved/ deserve impeachment. I'm not a Republican. Get a clue.

[gr8fuldaniel]

Just shows how perfectly hypocritical Americans are. How impeachable a lie about sex is, yet a lie to kill over 100000 people is hunky-dorey.

Why is popular opinion not shifting against these criminals?

Do you suppose it is because people:

A) Dont want to believe it
B) Are afraid to seem unpatriotic
C) Are afraid the goons will come after them (More innocent bloodshed, just another notch in Bush's gun butt)

[bullshitdetector]

As if the democratic anti Bush team are never guilty of this to counter their opponent? Get real Tech.

[Mr.Vicchio]

Your website for this?

Good stuff.

I got one for you, shows we didn't land any men on the moon, real detailed. You might like it!

Sheesh, I swear either Karl Rove somehow planeted Michael Moore and a few others into the Anti-Bush Left to keep them unhinged, or those same people are just so.... emotional, that they don't see how carrying on like this does nothing but ensure the further lossess of those they hate so much.

[bullshitdetector]

100,000 people? That is a flat out lie, Dannyboy. Bush may have been mis-informed but he did not lie.

[gr8fuldaniel]

[SIZE=3] 100,000 Iraqi civilians dead, says study [/SIZE] The Guardian UK Sarah Boseley, health editor Friday October 29, 2004 The Guardian About 100,000 Iraqi civilians - half of them women and children - have died in Iraq since the invasion, mostly as a result of airstrikes by coalition forces, according to the first reliable study of the death toll from Iraqi and US public health experts. The study, which was carried out in 33 randomly-chosen neighbourhoods of Iraq representative of the entire population, shows that violence is now the leading cause of death in Iraq. Before the invasion, most people died of heart attacks, stroke and chronic illness. The risk of a violent death is now 58 times higher than it was before the invasion.

100000, Is civilians only. Doesnt include "insurgents" and doesnt include Americans he has killed in this war for oil and empire. He was looking for a reason to attack Iraq from the day he was elected. He had to force Intel to suit his needs. He had to stoop to Intel from an Iranian spy to fabricate evidence of WMDs and lied to America about an Imminent Threat and a MUSHROOM CLOUD. You couldnt tell he was lying? I thought you were a BS Detector.

[gr8fuldaniel]

The research was led by Les Roberts of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

I should have included this from the above article.