To Com and Comp.

[m5lange1]

*Disclaimer....
This is in Butterface because it does not express my personal beliefs. However since the two Coms seem to think I put sublimnal libral messages in my posts I thought I would drop this little tidbit in here and give them something legitimate to attack.

THINGS YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE TO BE A REPUBLICAN TODAY: > >  Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary Clinton. > > Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's > daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him > and a bad guy when Bush needed a "we can't find Bin Laden" diversion. > > The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our > highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions against Iraq. > > A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but > multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation. > > The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay. > > If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have sex. > > A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our long-time allies, > then demand their cooperation and money. > > Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. > Providing health care to all Americans is socialism. > > HMOs and insurance companies have the best interests of the public at heart. > > Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but > creationism should be taught in schools. > > A president lying about an extramarital affair is an impeachable offense. A president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy. > > Government should limit itself to the powers named in the > Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet. > > The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades, but > George Bush's driving record is none of our business. > > Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a > conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers > for your recovery. > > You support states' rights, which means Attorney General John Ashcroft > can tell states what local voter initiatives they have the right to adopt. > > What Bill Clinton did in the 1960s is of vital national interest, but > what Bush did in the '80s is irrelevant. > > Friends don't let friends vote Republican.

[Compugasm]

Your really pissing me off with this. I don't care if your posts are liberal. Just the one where you claimed no opinion and fairness, and it was not. I will not acknowledge your quoted article as legitimate discussion. Drop it already.

[m5lange1]

This is butterface Comp. Lighten up.

Anyway it was this false accusation of yours that you state as fact that started this. And you state it here once again as though it were fact.

Just the one where you claimed no opinion and fairness, and it was not.

Boldface from me for emphasis.

It is one thing for you to claim that you are right on an issue and that I am wrong.

It is quite another for you to claim you are right about what I mean and I am wrong.

PS. I would guess you have no doubt at all that Fox is totally honest when it says.....
"Fair and balanced, We report, You decide".

[Compugasm]

Originally posted by m5lange1, I would guess you have no doubt...

There you go again! What the hell do you know about me? Whatever. I haven't watched TV in years. Stop telling me what I belive!! I'm not one of the students in your liebrary! Write that down in the psychological profile notes you've got on me.

[m5lange1]

How can anyone type this....

QUOTE  Compugasm Posted on 09-07-2004 12:35 AM Just the one where you claimed no opinion and fairness, and it was not.

telling me you know what I mean better than I do, and then type this....

Compugasm Posted on 09-07-2004 01:42 PM There you go again! What the hell do you know about me?....Stop telling me what I belive!!

later that same day?

Do you truly not see your own hypocrasy? Or are you just typical of your kind being able to dish it out but not take it?

It least I prefaced my statement with...

(m5lange1,) I would guess...

allowing that mine is just an opinion of your views.

You, on the other hand, state in absolutes

Compugasm Posted on 09-07-2004 12:35 AM .......and it was not.

as if it is not opinion but you know what I mean better than I do.

Either be a player or don't be a player but stop crying when you get back what you throw out.

[Compugasm]

Originally posted by m5lange1, How can anyone type this...

You claimed not to have an opinion, and clearly did. That's all I'm pointing out. The fact the opinion stated is left or right sided is irrelevant. As a matter of fact, if your thread was all about how Obama was "a good house nigger", we'd still be talking about this. Except, you'd be posting bullshit about what "I Must Believe To Be A Democrat".

[m5lange1]

Compugasm Posted on 09-07-2004 06:31 PM You claimed not to have an opinion, and clearly did.

Comp, Comp, Comp,

I never claimed not to have an opinion. What a ridiculous thing to say. I said my comments on the Keys, Obama issue was an observation on political strategy, and not taking a political side.

Which you, in turn, decided was slanted against your sacred beliefs and began to throw accusations around that had NOTHING to do with the point of my post.

So you take the position that you have a right to accuse, and state what other people "REALLY" mean, and then have the temerity to post things like....

What the hell do you know about me?

Stop telling me what I belive!

Wake up and read what you write son!

And where the hell did this come from?

if your thread was all about how Obama was "a good house nigger",

Just in case you missed it, (which IMHO you miss a lot) allow me to reprint this for you.




Your first post in that forum was:

Compugasm It's not that you're spinning, but that you've been spun. Your very next sentence starts the "canonized" Obama message. The words you use, "rising star", "hero", "is a given", "new democratic saint".

Lets put them in context. (boldface mine here for stress)

M5 Obama has sort of been cannonized as a rising star in the democratic party.

You do realize that in no way even hints at my agreement to his "cannonization"? Its what the dems have said. Fact. Deal with them not me.

M5 If he should maintain his stature he could be an up comming hero for the dems.

That is "COULD BECOME" and "FOR THE DEMS". What the hell do you, or I for that matter care who the dems think is their hero? Anyone whith even a modicum of objectivity can tell I am not calling him a hero, I am making an observation that he may become a hero to his party

M5 but manages to get a pretty big smudge on the new democratic saint's shiny white robe

I am sure if I had said the "republican saint's shiny white robe" you would have been the first to see the obvious sarcasm in the statement.
But since it was a "democratic saint's shiny white robe" the sarcasm whent right over (or through) your head.

There it is. You are an obsessive paranoid that sees insults and attacks whether they are there or not.

Worse still, you are a hypocrite who is only too free with your accusations of what others "really" mean but get pissed if anyone dares to give an opinion about what you believe.
So you are either a blatant hypocrite or you are a nut.

[Compugasm]

Originally posted by m5lange1,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (m5lange1,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>I never claimed not to have an opinion.[/b]

The very first words out of your mouth. "I am not taking a side on this".
<!--QuoteBegin-m5lange1,
But since it was a "democratic saint's shiny white robe" the sarcasm whent right over (or through) your head.[/quote]
Since when is sarcasm used in a non-biased discussion? You presented a bad argument. I'm supposed to read your mind I guess. I'm still waiting for "sarcasm" about Obama to begin. See, you missed my sarcasm about the house nigger. I'm not the only who wouldn't get it, even if you pasted it to my forehead! Fine LEAVE ME ALONE AND STOP CALLING ME NAMES!!!!

[m5lange1]

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

QUOTE (m5lange1,) I never claimed not to have an opinion. The very first words out of your mouth. "I am not taking a side on this".

Saying "I am not taking a side" has no relationship to me having an opinion. My opinion on this entire subject was (read this closely) that Keyes brought up the subject of reparations just to force Obama into an uncomfortable position.

See. That is an opinion. One can have an opinion without taking a side. Difficult concept? OK but still the truth.

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

Since when is sarcasm used in a non-biased discussion?

All the time Comp. I can be sarcastic about Kerry AND Bush when talking politics and still be completely neutral.
Difficult concept? OK but still the truth. I am an equal oppertunity user of sarcasm.

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

You presented a bad argument.

About what? You seem to focus on EVERYTHING except my original point so I am not sure if you are criticizing...
1. What I say Keyes is doing (doubt it cuz that is the real point which you still have never addressed)?
2. That I am neutral on the actual Keyes vs. Obama election (I suspect this is the one you are referring to as it fits your obsession better)?
3. That I do or do not have an opinion (a totally wierd statement that requires no argument but that you apparently want to debate)?
4. That you are a hypocritical nut (that is debatable but you have provided LOTs of evidence)?
Be more specific please.

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

I'm supposed to read your mind I guess.

I would not think so but you claim to know my meaning better than I do so I assume this is a power you believe you have.

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

See, you missed my sarcasm about the house nigger

Guilty. But then I never claimed this statement to be anything sarcastic or non-sarcastic. So your point is?

Compugasm Posted on 09-11-2004 11:42 PM

LEAVE ME ALONE AND STOP CALLING ME NAMES!!!!

This is butterface so name calling is totally legal, but in the interest of decency let me rectract calling you a hypocrite and a nut.
You are ACTING like a hypocrite and a nut!!!
Is that better?