![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Moderator | Red States vs. Blue States I heard this on one of the podcasts I listen to. I thought it was hilarious: blog post disclaimer: words may cause offense Quote:
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings. | |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| BANNED Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
| I think it's so nice that the media not only wants to tell people what they think, and how they should vote, but now they want to tell them how to think about the other guys as well. Yep, I always enjoy these opinion peices, because, of course, there are predictably only two sides to every story. The solution always has to be the Republican answer, or the Democratic answer. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| BANNED
Posts: 4,045
| Because we haven't had a civil war in the past fourteen decades, people think we can't have one now. Where is the geographic clarity of the Mason-Dixon line? When you look at the red-state blue-state division in the past few elections, you get a false impression. The real division is urban, academic, and high-tech counties versus suburban, rural, and conservative Christian counties. How could such widely scattered "blue" centers and such centerless "red" populations ever act in concert?The article continues here: Keeping Things Civil - Afterword to the novel Empire by Orson Scott Card What I wanted to point out (especially for those of you who aren't form the U.S.) is that red and blue states are a myth. It really is urban versus rural. Note that I'm speaking in generalizations. Cincinnati Ohio always goes right wing and tiny little Yellow Springs out in rural Ohio is a bastion of hippie liberalism. The conflict of urban versus rural is as old as cities, but the podcaster is right. It has gotten nasty lately... especially on social issues like gay marriage and abortion. The right has convinced itself that it has a god-given right to ban things it doesn't agree with. It's not good enough to simply choose not to buy rocky road ice cream; if you're a conservative, you have to get the ice cream vendor to stop selling it and villify those who eat it. "You eat rocky road!? You're a disgusting person." The left (whack jobs aside) has been trying to wage a war of "leave me the hell alone so long as it's not hurting you" which is ironic because (up until recently) this had been the mantra of conservatives. At the basis of the conservative view is the idea that the majority can dictate laws and policies to the minority. Liberals have become the opposite: the majority should respect the wishes of the minority. Considering our Constitution (Bill of Rights) is meant to protect the individual from the government, I find the conservative stance untenable and unAmerican. Saying, "I believe in freedom and my god given right to tell you how to live your life" isn't what the Fathers had in mind. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Paladin Location: Narnia
Posts: 4,277
| Well, it's not really so clear cut as all of that. Both sides, for instance, try to force legislature based on their personal ethos. If you think that the conservatives are the only ones trying to limit freedoms, buddy, you've had your head in the sand. Place me like a seal over your heart, like a seal on your arm; for love is as strong as death, its jealousy unyielding as the grave. It burns like blazing fire, like a mighty flame. -- Song 8:6 |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |