| Advertise Here » Browse ad-free by donating | |
|
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
 |
| | Thread Tools |
Oct 23, 2007, 02:31 pm
| #1 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 10 | EIA vs ERA I've heard the terms thrown around before: Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Risk Assessment. These are now required for most projects that would change the environment in any way. What is the difference between ERA and EIA, and which is more important? |
|  |
|
Oct 23, 2007, 04:45 pm
| #2 (permalink) (top) | |
| It's my first name!  Location: Buffalo, New York, USA Posts: 3,523 | Quote:
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own." -John Quincy Adams - | |
|
| |
|
Nov 7, 2007, 12:52 am
| #4 (permalink) (top) | |
 Homo sapiens Location: Houston, TX Posts: 2,070 | Quote:
I understand that your question is, "what is the difference." The difference is that one is a requirement of government, the other is not. One may be required for a construction project, the other is not. Was the mistake yours or your sources'. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;... --From Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli passed unanimously by the Senate 1797 | |
|
| |
