![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) |
| Libertarian Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 1,609 | Well, I have to disagree. I recently had a very close friend who was a woman. The friendship had to be broken off because my wife thought we were "too close". My wife wondered what there was in that friendship that I couldn't get from a male friend. Well, I'm still not completely sure how to answer that question. Yes, there was some sexual attraction between us, but I think we had that well under control. Beyond that, there was just a closeness that I don't think would be possible with a male friend. I think those things are related. I think I would be very uncomfortable with any type of man who might be sexually attracted to me, nothing wrong with such a person, I just don't go that way and don't have such feelings. (or, maybe, I am afraid I might have such feelings. Who really knows.) But, I am comfortable with such with a woman. And, I think in any really close relationship there is some of that. I'm not sure I've not ever had what I would consider a really close friendship in which there wasn't some underlying sexual tension. Not even that this is a major part of the relationship, just that it seems to always be there whenever I manage to get close to someone. So, I don't know how to really answer that question, but, for most men, I don't think it's really possible. Keith The great thread killer. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 14,168 | It's really hard to tell most of the time, but I don't think the OP was asking about "most men". At least it would be a very strange question to ask most men. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) | |
| Possibly edible? Posts: 783 | Quote:
That aspect of your situation, as well as similar ones, has everything to do with gender roles. For a female, the male is in all intense purposes her source of comfort and security(possibly as well as yours- I don't know the full context of your marraige). Considering this, the situation of "breaking off" had everything to do with gender roles- the underlying sexual tension and possessiveness that exists in a male-female relationship can exist in a male-male relationship when the two are living together, considering this. In fact, I would not be surprised if some of my homosexual brethren were more comfortable with having thier partner hang out with females than with males. Hell, I've even seen a couple of examples of such a thing amongst my friends. I also would not be surprised if some homosexuals could not form the same casual relationship with a male as you did with that one other female in your situation. Really, this all depends on individual context. I guess for "most" you would find some barrier in getting emotional security due to the stoic nature of the average male-male relationship, but in homosexual situations you have to keep in mind many of those roles are twisted, reinterpreted, or thrown right out the metaphorical window. Side effects may include gastrointestinal homicide, theft of luck, apocalyptic hallucinations, and demonic possession. Please do not soak in milk as doing so will result in death. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) | |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 14,168 | Quote:
The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) (top) | |
| Libertarian Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 1,609 | Quote:
Can "a man get all his emotional needs met by another man"?? I think that answer would clearly be "Yes!". There is certainly "a man" in existence who could do so. Can most men do so? I guess that's a completely different discussion. If "a man" is truly homosexual, he most obviously can. But, "most men" are not homosexual. I would contend that "most men" cannot. But, "a man" certainly can. Keith The great thread killer. | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | What emotional needs can a women give a man that a man cant What emotional needs can a women give a man that a man cant ae there any emotions a women can supply a man that anthoer man cant if so what are some of the emotions a man cant give another man that ONLY a women can |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) (top) | |
| Possibly edible? Posts: 783 | Quote:
As he said himself- "I think I would be very uncomfortable with any type of man who might be sexually attracted to me". Even in a close friendship that spans over many years between a gay and straight individual, a barrier in the way of the sort of emotional intimacy mentioned above would likely exist and be brought up to the surface when such a dynamic might try to naturally come into play in the relationship between a straight and a gay individual. Side effects may include gastrointestinal homicide, theft of luck, apocalyptic hallucinations, and demonic possession. Please do not soak in milk as doing so will result in death. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) (top) | |
| Possibly edible? Posts: 783 | Quote:
All I know is there are a lot of old single men out there- how do they do it? Drinks? Drugs? Whores? There has to be some method to thier madness- any guesses? Side effects may include gastrointestinal homicide, theft of luck, apocalyptic hallucinations, and demonic possession. Please do not soak in milk as doing so will result in death. Last edited by Zinkovich; Mar 24, 2007 at 05:19 am. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) (top) |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,174 | It depends on how you seperate needs from wants. We all need enough contact and intimacy with other people so that we don't become disconnected and depressed. To this extent, yeah I'm pretty sure any guy can have a platonic relationship with another guy that fulfills these needs. Also to a deeper level, that desire to feel important to someone, to be needed by them, that too you can also get between two men. Look at soldiers for a start. But when it comes to your wants, your not gonna have that feeling you get after sex when your legs are wrapped around each other and you can feel their breath on your chest, between two straight guys. I don't consider that connection an emotional need, but damn you miss it when your not in a relationship. Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) (top) | |
| Libertarian Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 1,609 | Quote:
I just can't see myself getting as close to another man as is possible with a woman. Will I survive without either, of course. Would my life be better without both, probably not. Keith The great thread killer. | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 2 | First of all, I believe everybody is intitle to their own choice to choose whom ever they want to be with. I am not here to judge nobody. I will leave the judging up to the God you sever and worship. However, i personally believe that a man can't and will not receive all his emotional needs met by another man.Anybody who feel that a man can get all his emotional needs met by another man is clear evidence that the devil is alive and the devil is a liar.There certain emotion that only a women can touch on a man that another man can't do. God made adam and eve for a reason. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) (top) | |
![]() Fyrdman Location: Middlesbrough UK Posts: 4,174 | Quote:
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) (top) | |
| Libertarian Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 1,609 | Quote:
Keith The great thread killer. | |
| | |