![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #81 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 687 | Quote:
Since Ghandi spoke English and Himmler spoke German, I would sit with Ghandi BECAUSE I COULD EASILY UNDERSTAND WHAT HE WAS TRYING TO COMMUNICATE. It wouldn't matter in the least what the cover of the book looked like if it was written in a language I couldn't understand. Big Jr is watching you! | |
| | |
| | #82 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | hey gandhi spoke hindi to and himmiler spoke english to but u still would read shakspear even though passages are incomprehensible and parrot the cligue ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh what a great writter WHY and not read bad grammer pams philosophy book Last edited by pam699; Mar 20, 2007 at 04:34 am. Reason: add |
| | |
| | #84 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | hey u all say u want take a person seriously if they write in bad grammer we all know you are talking bullsh..t and i will give an example if u lived in stalinist russia and stalin said he will send out a book writen in bad grammer to ever housin your street and in the book was the number of the houses he was going to knock on and if any one was home when he knocked he would shot them i bet you would read that book avidly ploughing througfh the nbad grammer to see if your house was listed so u could make sure u where not home when stalin knocked by hell you would take him and his bad grammer very seruoisly; the point is not many people take most books seriousl;y any way that is why the are obsessed with grammer most books are drivel and rubbish so grammer becomes important but we all know for the realy seruious books -like shapspears plays bad grammmer is not that important we only take the rubbish books seriously with regard to grammer but books like stalins list which are very seruouis we dont care much for grammer |
| | |
| | #85 (permalink) (top) | |
| Absolutely Superb Posts: 774 | Quote:
Next thing you know, the person's house is knocked down with him completely unprepared-because of this, he starts a violent revolution and overthrows Stalin long before what would have otherwise been his prime. My point? Don't use bad grammar if you want people to start a violent revolution against you...er, I think. ![]() | |
| | |
| | #87 (permalink) (top) | |
| Igneous Magma Posts: 687 | Quote:
It's obvious you are doing this for attention so I will stop giving you what you need. Perhaps when you grow up you will understand. Big Jr is watching you! | |
| | |
| | #88 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | i am doing this for a point quo but u still would read shakspear even though passages are incomprehensible and parrot the cligue ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh what a great writter WHY and not read bad grammer pams philosophy book if u all say u want take a book in bad grammer seriously so would u nevertheless take shakpsears bad grammer seriously and not mine WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY Last edited by pam699; Mar 20, 2007 at 08:41 am. Reason: add |
| | |
| | #89 (permalink) (top) |
| Volcanic Erupter Posts: 9,491 | The funniest thing about this bizarre display is that thus far the content of pam699's ramblings has been completely worthless. Even if her spelling and grammar were perfect it wouldn't change the obvious vacuousness of her posts. The funniest thing is how she repeatedly invokes Einstein. It would be sad if it weren't funny. By the way, my spelling sucks. Always has. I am grateful for Jason for adding the spell-checking feature to these boards. Helps a lot. Doesn't improve my proofreading, but what can you do? Rick "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." Sinclair Lewis |
| | |
| | #90 (permalink) (top) | |
| I'm NOT Perfect. Location: Maryland Posts: 64 | My 2 Cents. Quote:
If it did, I don't think it would occur always, just sometimes. As others have mentioned, I think bad grammar is mostly due to laziness. I do not have signature. | |
| | |
| | #91 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | but u would not hesitate to read a newly discovered play of shapsear with all its bad grammer or a newly discovered book by einstien "how to make a million dollars" for all its bad grammer what u dont like is i have shown u all up as linquistic hypocrite you say bad grammer cant be taken seriously but then jump in and read shakspear and einstein if it makes u money HYPOCRITES |
| | |
| | #92 (permalink) (top) | |||
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,366 | Quote:
Quote:
You'd be better off asking how Jabberwocky became a classic poem despite its incomprehensibility. I suggest had not Lewis Carroll written it, it wouldn't have survived in popular literature. Quote:
The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) | |||
| | |
| | #93 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | qoute You'd be better off asking how Jabberwocky became a classic poem despite its incomprehensibility. I suggest had not Lewis Carroll written it so it all depends on who is useing bad grammer -my very point you all worship reputation and notablity if a writter has thes eu will read him regardless of his bad grammer but u critices me for bad grammer and would not read any book i wrote -i rest my point grammer dont matter so long as it makes u money or a famous person uses it |
| | |
| | #94 (permalink) (top) |
| formerly Isherwood Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 13,366 | What you should have noticed is that Jabberwocky follows the rules of grammar (for the 1870s) but uses made-up words instead of commonly understood words. It's both clever and innovative. I can't say the same for your posts. If a member posted constantly in Jabberwocky-style, there'd be complaints and we'd have to ask them to knock it off. The Forum Rules Radical Atheist Heathen Queer Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be. (Ashleigh Brilliant) |
| | |
| | #95 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | but my point is which you cant deny without being seen as a leir is quote you all worship reputation and notablity if a writter has these u will read him regardless of his bad grammer but u critices me for bad grammer and would not read any book i wrote -i rest my point grammer dont matter so long as it makes u money or a famous person uses it |
| | |
| | #97 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | no my original point was Is bad grammar a sign of low intelligence so back to the point after all this debate now what is your answer to the question and would you judge a mind by the way it might be badly expressed as in my case hypothetical of einstien being failed for bad grammer and not going to university and not writing his theories but ending up a chicken theif all because so idiot teacher though bad grammer ment low intelligence |
| | |
| | #98 (permalink) (top) |
| Sedimentary Rock Posts: 1 | When the grammar is such that people don't understand, then great difficulties will arise. Apparently, millions of dollars are lost in corporations every year due to bad grammar, due to people misunderstanding what the message intended. As for Pam ... I get the drift of what you are saying, even though the grammar and spelling are poor ... it appears that you have little respect for the people with whom you are TRYING to communicate. Then, you are blaming the recipient of the message for not understanding you. |
| | |
| | #100 (permalink) (top) |
| BANNED Posts: 583 | yes but please just answer yes or no Quote by: pam699 View Post Is bad grammar a sign of low intelligence. I ask this because some people seem to think if u cant spell properly then u have low intelligence so does bad grammar = low inteligence |
| | |