The Volconvo Private Investigators

[Epistemologist]

Good luck Idmaniac, we'll miss you.

[Jimmy the Pro]

Quote by: Epistemologist Good luck Idmaniac, we'll miss you.

lollerskates, hm I think i can find a credible source that can tell us something about Limbaugh and Coulter.


AHA! I found my source, and I assure this guy is a top notch source to have...

Quote by: Bill Maher "Rush Limbaugh is in trouble. Prosecutors say that they have enough evidence to put him away on 10 felony counts. This would be the biggest blow to the conservative movement since Anne Coulter announced she had a penis."

Coulter has a penis! Therefore it is my logical conclusion that...She is in fact a HERMAPHRODITE!!!

Let me show you why....a little further into my investigation I found this...



I'm no expert but those two lumps look like boobs to me.

What a shocking conclusion. Coulter is a hermaphrodite! :eek:

Case *shudders* closed

[Gods_Mercenary]

Braver man than I, Idmaniac, I salute you *snaps to attention, salutes*

[Epistemologist]

Quote by: ldmaniac What a shocking conclusion. Coulter is a hermaphrodite! :eek: Case *shudders* closed

I suspected it all along. Thanks.

[Chaossaber314]

How much wood, would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

[Gods_Mercenary]

Damn, that's a hard one!

[Epistemologist]

Quote by: Chaossaber314 How much wood, would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

I suspect it's variable among different woodchuck organisms as they may have different chucking abilities. For instance, a completely disabled woodchuck may not be able to chuck wood at all even though its species can do so.

Also, if we had a competition among fit woodchucks to determine how much a woodchuck could chuck, we would expect different chucking results since they have differing abilities.

But if you're searching for an average of the amount of wood, then I don't have it. Sorry.

[Jack]

It's roughly half the amount of ground a groundhog can grind, if a groundhog can grind ground.

[leftcider]

Can you please pull up some Ann Coulter porn to terrify the Volconvo community?

[Jimmy the Pro]

Quote by: leftcider Can you please pull up some Ann Coulter porn to terrify the Volconvo community?

:eek: to the 4 million power. And as a side note are you male or female? (Not that I think you want to see her naked but....)

I shall transfer the request to VETO. (Volconvo's Extreme Terror Organizaion.)

[Chaossaber314]

Quote by: Epistemologist I suspect it's variable among different woodchuck organisms as they may have different chucking abilities. For instance, a completely disabled woodchuck may not be able to chuck wood at all even though its species can do so. Also, if we had a competition among fit woodchucks to determine how much a woodchuck could chuck, we would expect different chucking results since they have differing abilities. But if you're searching for an average of the amount of wood, then I don't have it. Sorry.

Ha HA! I have successfully stumped the Private Investigators!

A wood chuck's chucking ability is not relevant to a ground hogs grinding ability. Apples and oranges, I say!

[Jimmy the Pro]

Quote by: Chaossaber314 Ha HA! I have successfully stumped the Private Investigators! A wood chuck's chucking ability is not relevant to a ground hogs grinding ability. Apples and oranges, I say!

You have not fooled all of us, for you see I am gathering research on this very question as we speak...

The answer is coming, VPI never leaves a case unsolved. (Not even Ann Coulter)

[Praxius]

Alright.... here's another one for when you are ready.

Many have debated that when a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it, it does not produce a sound..... yet when the tree collides with the ground, there is a shock wave and force being produced, which would alter the normal pattern of the air around it, causing a sound wave..... just because there is not an ear to pick it up, doesn't mean there is no sound, correct?

Wouldn't that be the same as if a plane crashed in the ocean and I didn't see it, means it never happened?

[Jimmy the Pro]

Quote by: Praxius Alright.... here's another one for when you are ready. Many have debated that when a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it, it does not produce a sound..... yet when the tree collides with the ground, there is a shock wave and force being produced, which would alter the normal pattern of the air around it, causing a sound wave..... just because there is not an ear to pick it up, doesn't mean there is no sound, correct? Wouldn't that be the same as if a plane crashed in the ocean and I didn't see it, means it never happened?

Hmm, This is very simple to me. Of course it happened. Unfortunately no one will be able to claim that it happened. Just because we cannot claim something happens does not mean that it is barred from happening. If things were barred from happening simply because no one could tell of their occurance then we have far greater power than I think we give ourselves credit for.

If because we didn't see the action, it now has not happened, then our eyes and minds have the ability to stop and alter history. Fascinating.

[Praxius]

Quote by: ldmaniac Hmm, This is very simple to me. Of course it happened. Unfortunately no one will be able to claim that it happened. Just because we cannot claim something happens does not mean that it is barred from happening. If things were barred from happening simply because no one could tell of their occurance then we have far greater power than I think we give ourselves credit for. If because we didn't see the action, it now has not happened, then our eyes and minds have the ability to stop and alter history. Fascinating.

Agreed.... which is why I never understood those who claim no sound was made.

[Gods_Mercenary]

Sound is only present when something is there to sense the sound wave, after all, a deaf person couldn't be said to be experiencing sound just because the sound waves are present. A sound wave is simply that, a wave of vibration.

[Scribbler1]

Quote by: Gods_Mercenary Sound is only present when something is there to sense the sound wave, after all, a deaf person couldn't be said to be experiencing sound just because the sound waves are present. A sound wave is simply that, a wave of vibration.

Ah, but if there is a deaf man standing next to one who CAN hear and a tree falls down...



I know, it makes half a sound.

[Gods_Mercenary]

No, there is a sound present to the one who hears it, but not to the one who is deaf.

[Scribbler1]

Quote by: Gods_Mercenary No, there is a sound present to the one who hears it, but not to the one who is deaf.

But if the one with normal hearing HEARS it, there must then be...

Ah, never mind.

[Gods_Mercenary]

hmm, there is a sound, but there is no such thing as sound to one who can't hear, this discussion is very mundane, I know.