Please, read it again

[La Mangra]

You can’t stop, slow or make the time to run faster, due to the absence of the influenced object

The term “World beginning” is a lie, since the time count doesn’t have a starting point

A supposition about the ready made God is impossible to come true in the real world term because of his inevitably eternal past and the consequent question about what had he done for so long before he created the world

Because the infinite past of nothing, but fantasies and pondering is impossible to fake, so far nobody told us anything about his former life in details

You can’t say why didn’t he create the world before, since during his life, he should think endless number of times about it. Just as you do it reading this message again and again

If you believe in God, you should believe in eternal madness, never before it interrupted by the desire to create you

[Questatement]

What if there was a 'time' when the speed of 'time' was infinite?

[La Mangra]

What if there was a 'time' when the speed of 'time' was infinite?

A thought is a state of consciousness, rather than a mere information

[La Mangra]

Final version

You can’t stop, slow or make the time to run faster, due to the absence of the influenced object

The term "World beginning" is a lie, since the time count doesn't have a starting point

The ready made God is impossible to come true in the real world supposition because of his inevitably eternal past and the consequent question about what had he done for so long before he created the world

Because the infinite past of mere thinking is impossible to fake, so far nobody told us anything about his former life in details

One of the questions, which might be asked from any self-proclaimed God, is why didn't he create the world before it

[BlackSheep]

You would likely get more replies if you post made a clear point and made more sense. This is a debate site. Make a claim and support it.

What do you mean by an influenced object?

How do you know time has no starting point?

What is a ready made god?

[La Mangra]

What do you mean by an influenced object?

- You can't influence anything in order to stop, to slow or to make the time to move faster

How do you know time has no starting point?

- When did it start?

What is a ready made god?

- Jesus as one of them

[BlackSheep]

- You can't influence anything in order to stop, to slow or to make the time to move faster

That doesn't answer my question.

- When did it start?

You didn't answer my question.

- Jesus as one of them

And again you didn't answer my question.

You seem to have no desire to clarify or make a claim.

[La Mangra]

You cheat. One must not continue his claimants after he was proved to be wrong

[Void Serpent]

To summarize in a coherent manner. There is no god, for god to have existed he would have had to exist before he existed or created the world before he created it. Time is an illusion of observation, so for god to have existed before time he would not be observing time, which time is what makes thing progress in a forward manner. This time before time began in the words of doctor who would be "from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey...stuff." So in a nut shell god does not exist because of the age old paradox of the the first first, or what was there before there was something. Is that what you were getting at that god is logically impossible?

[La Mangra]

I'll be kind to you. An article and shameless self-promotion. You can read more like this one at Post-It School


No thought is mere information


An attempt to explain you what we think. We don’t have the proper words for it, build and replace the ones used by me with your own perceptions

As the contents of your mind, thoughts are similar in their ability to influence your decisions to what the binary data and commands are in case of the PC processors: everything “seems to be true for you” *, even the claims about the false opinions. You “care about the brought by them subject”

The above is not a malfunction if the contents were built for you correctly, we need it as the first condition which let us make our conclusions. You just can’t do it if the fact weren’t constructed for you as either right or wrong. You can’t do it, if what you think is of no importance to you

On practice, we think something of mixed nature: our thought moves between the neutral views, arguments and counter arguments neither entirely right or entirely wrong


To the present situation

Your hardware must decide which contents of your mind to present you next in the way which might let you to agree with them. At the same time you need to communicate with your environment

- We suppose the world consist from myriad matters. Many people around you belong to the different matters than one of ours

- We are in the war between developed by us devices and software. It main tools are sent to you codes

- Due to the nature of created by us devices and software, operations in the war like this last for billions of years


Report of your current damage:

- You need to upgrade your hardware in order to avoid searching for the answers to all and any transmitted to you statements

The Filth uses it in order to drag you in the problems and questions build by your processors following sent to you codes

- You need to upgrade your hardware to make it able to ignore sent to you codes or totally transform them

At present time, your processors let anyone to convince you or just to break your resistance using the command types of the contents which they build for your mind

- You need to upgrade your hardware in order to make it able to distinguish the cases when your processors shouldn’t listen to you

- You need to upgrade your hardware in order to make it able to distinguish the dangerous to you types of mind contents

In particular, you must try to understand better what do you call by thoughts and why do you agree with them

- You need to upgrade your hardware in order to make it able to distinguish the dangerous to you statements and pieces of information


* We always try to tell about the idealized facts instead of insights into the real situation

It appears to me, I’ve described the stuff we think correctly: “seems to be true for you”. All points to the conclusion our thought was significantly damaged