???Quote by: soothsayer
???
Nah, I'm not going to carry on with you. You are just venting your hatred onto me, and I have been a willing target. Believe what you will; I really don't shive a get. I just hope that you guys cease trying to teach in schools that homosexuality his both healthy and normal, but it is not.
Heard this tune before, mate.Nah, I'm not going to carry on with you.
Sorry, but the truth belongs in schools, not your bigotry and ignorance.I just hope that you guys cease trying to teach in schools that homosexuality his both healthy and normal, but it is not.
If that is you can find a member. The KKK has been a non-force for decades. Half the members are FBI agents.
Liberalism is entrenched and a serious danger to our security. Liberalism is a social disease.
no i cannot say that i have. my comment can be made for any of the posts you have made so far. you have supplied no reasons just your personal an completely unsupported attacks.
be nice if you held your own participation to such a standard.soothsayeronce again, i am forced to reitrate
i just prefer it when its participants go about it with a bit of class and discretion.
With respect to homosexuality, I write from personal experience and closely held beliefs that are generally shared by most Americans. I cannot believe that you demand proof that what homosexuals do is filthy and disgusting.
I never search the net for data to support my opinions. That data is heavily edited and I generally distrust it. One can find anything one wants to find on the net. Most, IMO are written with an agenda.
I have no agenda; I am just saying that homosexuality makes me sick and it does to most other people too.
Just because the majority is stupid doesn't mean you should be proud to count yourself amongst them. And yes, you have an agenda.I have no agenda; I am just saying that homosexuality makes me sick and it does to most other people too.
If a gay couple have a solid relationship and have the financial capacity to do so, I don't see why they should not be allowed to adopt a child. We all know there are a lot of kids out there who need to be adopted. The same standards should be held for heterosexual partners as well. I don't see what the big deal is.
It looks like science says there is nothing wrong with it. What other possible objections can there be? Are there any papers that say other wise?I conclude that there is no factual basis for claims that the adoption of children by lesbain and gay parents is harmful to children. On the contrary, there is every reason to believe, based on research findings, that children of lesbian and gay parents develop as successfully as do children of heterosexual parents. For this reason, and in view of the needs of children who are involved, I argue that for purposes of adoption proceedings, sexual orientation of propspective parents should be considered irrelevant.[1]
[1] 2 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 191 (1995)
Adoption of Minor Children by Lesbian and Gay Adults: A Social Science Perspective; Patterson, Charlotte J.
So sick that you can't tear yourself away from the subject - as you have repeatedly threatened to do over the last few days.
There must be a fascination in there somewhere, eh, DE? - despite all your protestations. You keep being drawn back, it seems.
The topic of this thread is Gay Adoption. Further thread derailment may lead to this thread being closed, and infractions issued.
[do not respond]
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks