Even though this wasn't directed at me...I'll comply...You have given me no challenge to defend other than to counter with my opinion that the paper on a whole is logically sound and reliable for law makers to base decisions on.
If you can't pick apart even a single point in the paper, I'll assume you have no arguments against any points, hence, no argument against the whole.
the ' paper ' #cough# #ack# is from Narth...a website that believes homosexuality is a ' mental problem '...highly prejudiced with a specific anti-homo agenda...
that ' claims ' it's existence is to help people who do not want to be gay get straight. That homosexuality is not biological but ' mental ' and can be treated.
Can you pick a more biased site...the paper isn't even worth my time to read.