Passengers survive airplane crash

[JBG]

MSM has concealed, as usual, Zionist activities that occurred in the wake of yesterday’s Air France disaster. See below:
=============================================================
Passengers Survive Fiery Crash

Greg Bonnell
Canadian Press
Wednesday, August 03, 2005

TORONTO -- Descending from a blackened, lightning-streaked sky, more than 300 terrified passengers and crew escaped with their lives Tuesday after their plane skidded down a rain-slicked runway at Pearson International Airport and toppled into a wooded ravine before bursting into flames.

Even more spectacular than the fiery end of Air France Flight 358, which came at the height of rush hour and within full view of Canada's busiest highway, was the fact that the crash claimed no lives, leaving just 43 of the 297 passengers and 12 crew members with little more than minor injuries.

*snip*

CREDIT: (Courtesy CBC)
Air France jet on fire at
Toronto International Airport August 2.

*snip*
Many passengers, including one of the co-pilots, escaped the wreckage in the moments after the crash and climbed out of Etobicoke Creek ravine to flag down drivers along the busiest automotive thoroughfare in Canada, said Peel police Sgt. Glyn Griffiths.
"We located the co-pilot on Highway 401," Griffiths said.

The remainder of the story has been concealed by Zionist imperialists.

Residents of the Thornhill and North York sections of Toronto, apparently Jews who moved from Montreal shortly after the 1976 victory of the forces of liberation in Quebec, poured out of synagogues and homes and into the area of the crash. Many wielded machetes and switchblades. Approximately six passengers were beheaded. Numerous other passengers were raped or robbed of their valuable possessions.

Bernie Farbman of the Canadian Jewish Congress expressed concern for the victims of the crash and subsequent Zionist attacks. He stated, however: “The Jews are justifiably very angry with the lengthy history and abuse by Francophones. While I certainly do not condone the methods of the attacks, one must understand the rage of the Jewish people”.

Continuing attacks by Zionist interests are expected. The RCMP has announced measures to protect the French community in Quebec, including additional appointments of Francophones to Canada’s civil service, and payments to various advertising agencies and law firms to enhance local security.

[Nono]

Hee-hee! The article forgets to mention that they were also equipped with straws to suck up the blood. I tell ya, this festering Gallo-Judaic warfare in Canada is tearing the country apart. :)

Back on topic, there's this from the Toronto Star.

Quote by: Zeeb While the doors and chutes may be important after a landing, they didn't contribute anything to the cause of this crash. This pilot chose to land in unsafe weather conditions, touched down too far down the runway, and came in too fast. Hydroplaning shouldn't have been a contributing cause either, unless the pilot mis-used the brakes. The thrust reversers are normally used to bring the aircraft to a speed below that which hydroplaning occurs before any major braking is used. Everything points to pilot error, however, with millions of dollars worth of lawsuits undoubtedly being prepared, Air France will do everything in it's power to obfuscate the issue and spread the blame (and the monetary awards).

I'd largely agree with that. The only problem is to avoid skidding in wet, gusty conditions when you have only reverse thrust to slow down to a speed where the wheels will make contact and steering and braking will become possible. The point is that there's always a brief phase during landing in which the aircraft is in a compromised position: your airspeed is now too low for the aerodynamic control surfaces to have steering "authority", whereas it's still high enough to be producing plenty of lift from the wings, thus preventing the tires from having any bite on the runway.

If things start going off the rails at that point you're out of luck. And again, speaking of luck, runway 24L is the shortest one at Pearson and there's a ravine right off the end of it.

Probably the touch-down so far down the runway was due to a long float prompted by the extra airspeed the pilot had been maintaining on final approach to counter windshear.

Finally, he'll doubtless end up being blamed for trying to land in dangerous conditions. But he sure wasn't the only one: witness the tape of the controller telling the aircraft right behind him to do a missed approach and proceed to his alternate.