![]() |
|
| The Debate Forums | Blogs | | | Donate | Register (it's free) | Chatroom | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||||
|
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) (top) | |
| former overlord Location: New York Posts: 2,383 | Bush rejects Kyoto-style G8 deal http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4647383.stm Quote:
So it goes | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) (top) |
| fanatic and profound Location: Stockholm, Sweden Posts: 335 | He's making the EU even angrier. Maybe because if Global warmin happens everywhere else, europe get's an ice-age. When the life of the entire planet is on the line, WHO CARES ABOUT ECONAMY!?!? "It is not power that corrupts but fear. Fear of losing power corrupts those who wield it and fear of the scourge of power corrupts those who are subject to it."- Aung San Suu Kyi |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) (top) | |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | Quote:
Maybe, waht if... Do you realize the Kyoto Accords would stall about a 0.5 Degree Celsius increase in temperature, and oh.. China, a large manufacturing and developing nation... would be free to pollute without penalty. Kyoto is bunk. Go read Michael Crichton's State of Fear, good read might enlighten you to some of the truths you seem to have not learned. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...379676-1964812 Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) (top) | |
| Navy Veteran Location: Texas Posts: 6,031 | Quote:
If humanity doesn't actually do anything to solve the problem just plays a shell game over the issue would you care then? Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) (top) | |
| BANNED Posts: 1,267 | Quote:
If global warming is a man made event (its not I suspect, it’s a natural cycle influenced by gig tons of methane and other natural greenhouse gasses being released as well as solar activity and natural events), I would remain against any agreement that didn’t include the developing nations as an equal to the USA. I care about the economy of the USA and don’t want to be paying 50$ for a gallon of clean burning fossil fuel because we agreed to a bad deal. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |