Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Breaking News


This topic in Breaking News is about Justices agree on right to own guns.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old May 7, 2008, 08:15 pm   #241 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,918
Quote:
And yet somehow there are dozens of wealthy, peaceful, democratic nations around the globe that practice strict gun control, whose citizens are not armed to the teeth, and yet manage to survive with far fewer murders per capita than do Americans.

Vast populations of psychotics in those countries, do you suppose???
Perhaps, but that's not the point. Demographically, the U.S. would probably have more murders anyway, we're not exactly a Denmark or a Switzerland in terms of the people who inhabit the country. Hell, we're not even a France. The argument for having a gun in your home is not found in the "larger" picture, which is blury at best, considering no two nations are alike, but when the burly robber has kicked in your door and is threatening your life. In that case, I'd prefer even the chance of properly defending myself to the fate that awaits me in the however long it takes for police to respond. In this case, I find it unlikely that you'd find comfort in that you'd have been less likely to be murdered in a country without guns if you had lived.


“What is the use of straining after an amiable view of things, when a cynical view is most likely to be the true one?”

-George Bernard Shaw

Your friendly neighborhood Mercenary
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 06:33 am   #242 (permalink) (top)
Chris the Chees
Moderator
 
Chris the Chees's Avatar
 
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,160
Quote:
Hell, we're not even a France.
Indeed, the US is more comparable to Britain, with its high violent crime rates. yet murder rates here are miniscule compared to those of the US.

Go figure.


Society may be formed so as to exist without crime, without poverty, […] no obstacle whatsoever intervenes at this moment except ignorance to prevent such a state of society.

Robert Owen
Chris the Chees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 06:58 am   #243 (permalink) (top)
BorisTheFerret
Outlaw Mustela
 
BorisTheFerret's Avatar
 
Location: The Woods.
Posts: 38
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
A gun is just as efficient a tool of defense as offense, and if you do not take reasonable steps to defend your body and your family yourself, I say you are the psychotic. There are in fact people who desire your possessions or even your life, and, yes, if necessary, I want to be able to shoot them.
Oh my god, you're so paranoid! And you call ME a psychotic?!? I'm just a ferret, you actually seem to believe there's a cabal of malevolents personally gunning for your blood!

The fact is that if America wasn't chock-full of guns, the murder rate would be far, FAR lower. You cannot dispute this.
BorisTheFerret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 12:17 pm   #244 (permalink) (top)
Sonart
It's simply logical
 
Sonart's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,117
.

Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary
In that case, I'd prefer even the chance of properly defending myself to the fate that awaits me in the however long it takes for police to respond. In this case, I find it unlikely that you'd find comfort in that you'd have been less likely to be murdered in a country without guns if you had lived.
Do you have any idea how idiotic that sounds?

You'd much prefer to have a gun to defend yourself against other people with guns, in a country in which you're considerably more likely to be murdered specifically because it has so many guns, than not to have a gun to defend yourself in a country where you're far less likely to be murdered by people with guns because there's far fewer guns.

That's like saying you'd rather have an SUV, even though it increases you're chances of dying in an accident, because you'd stand a better chance if you hit a small car, in which you'd actually have less of a chance of dying in an accident.

Or like saying that you won't wear seat belts because they make it harder to get out of a burning car, even though wearing them vastly increases your chances of surviving in the first place.

.


I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it
Sonart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 06:32 pm   #245 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,918
Quote:
Quote by: BorisTheFerret View Post
Oh my god, you're so paranoid! And you call ME a psychotic?!? I'm just a ferret, you actually seem to believe there's a cabal of malevolents personally gunning for your blood!

The fact is that if America wasn't chock-full of guns, the murder rate would be far, FAR lower. You cannot dispute this.
I wouldn't say a cabal, but you apparently live in a dreamland if you don't think there are people who wish harm on you. Until you actually remove all guns from america, that point is completely up for grabs, since it is total speculation.


“What is the use of straining after an amiable view of things, when a cynical view is most likely to be the true one?”

-George Bernard Shaw

Your friendly neighborhood Mercenary
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 06:39 pm   #246 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,918
Quote:
Quote by: Sonart View Post
.

Do you have any idea how idiotic that sounds?

You'd much prefer to have a gun to defend yourself against other people with guns, in a country in which you're considerably more likely to be murdered specifically because it has so many guns, than not to have a gun to defend yourself in a country where you're far less likely to be murdered by people with guns because there's far fewer guns.

That's like saying you'd rather have an SUV, even though it increases you're chances of dying in an accident, because you'd stand a better chance if you hit a small car, in which you'd actually have less of a chance of dying in an accident.

Or like saying that you won't wear seat belts because they make it harder to get out of a burning car, even though wearing them vastly increases your chances of surviving in the first place.

.

What the hells to stop a criminal from getting a gun? Any one who wants a gun just has to take a jont down to mexico and sneak an arsenal up. Your logic is flawed, because unless we shrink our borders, force our neighbors to ban guns, and pat down every warm body that passes over the border, all a ban of guns will do is put guns underground, in the hands of only those who intend to break the law. A gun is a desirable material good, and I am pressed to think of a ban of such an object that did anything but strengthen the criminal element and lead to more abuses in America.


“What is the use of straining after an amiable view of things, when a cynical view is most likely to be the true one?”

-George Bernard Shaw

Your friendly neighborhood Mercenary
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 07:57 pm   #247 (permalink) (top)
Aussie
Molten Ash
 
Aussie's Avatar
 
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 39
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
What the hells to stop a criminal from getting a gun? Any one who wants a gun just has to take a jont down to mexico and sneak an arsenal up. Your logic is flawed, because unless we shrink our borders, force our neighbors to ban guns, and pat down every warm body that passes over the border, all a ban of guns will do is put guns underground, in the hands of only those who intend to break the law. A gun is a desirable material good, and I am pressed to think of a ban of such an object that did anything but strengthen the criminal element and lead to more abuses in America.
Well is hasn't in Australia (and we have massive borders with Customs being about a drop in the ocean compared to US Customs.)

PS, its sad to think that your country is in it's current state because of attitudes like yours. The rest of the world is looking on in disbelief.


I reject your reality and insert my own!
Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 09:20 pm   #248 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
Not Machine Washable
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,091
Quote:
Quote by: Aussie View Post
Well is hasn't in Australia (and we have massive borders with Customs being about a drop in the ocean compared to US Customs.)

PS, its sad to think that your country is in it's current state because of attitudes like yours. The rest of the world is looking on in disbelief.

Why is it so important to the rest of the world that we disarm?


Liberalism - The philosophy for the person only a Nanny State could love.

Economic -5.25 Libertarian/Authoritarian -3.90
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 11:37 pm   #249 (permalink) (top)
Aussie
Molten Ash
 
Aussie's Avatar
 
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 39
Because you're coming across as a gun toting war mongering state. That tends to attract heat. That and as a human being its disgraceful how many are killed per year because of gun attitudes there. It doesn't matter what's pointed out to you, you just dont wanna let go of that gun. And it's killing people. Just because you haven't pulled the trigger, doesnt make you any less involved.


I reject your reality and insert my own!
Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8, 2008, 11:58 pm   #250 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
Not Machine Washable
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,091
Quote:
Quote by: Aussie View Post
Because you're coming across as a gun toting war mongering state. That tends to attract heat. That and as a human being its disgraceful how many are killed per year because of gun attitudes there. It doesn't matter what's pointed out to you, you just dont wanna let go of that gun. And it's killing people. Just because you haven't pulled the trigger, doesnt make you any less involved.

Oh, so it's just bleeding heart Liberalism.


Message recieved.


Liberalism - The philosophy for the person only a Nanny State could love.

Economic -5.25 Libertarian/Authoritarian -3.90
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 02:38 am   #251 (permalink) (top)
Aussie
Molten Ash
 
Aussie's Avatar
 
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 39
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
Oh, so it's just bleeding heart Liberalism.


Message recieved.
No, just pure common sense. It's not a hard equation.


I reject your reality and insert my own!
Aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 06:03 am   #252 (permalink) (top)
BorisTheFerret
Outlaw Mustela
 
BorisTheFerret's Avatar
 
Location: The Woods.
Posts: 38
Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary View Post
I wouldn't say a cabal, but you apparently live in a dreamland if you don't think there are people who wish harm on you. Until you actually remove all guns from america, that point is completely up for grabs, since it is total speculation.
Well maybe we SHOULD remove all guns from America. After all, as a nation you've shown you can't be trusted with deadly weapons.

When Americans have demonstrated their capacity not to go around killing each other, not to mention invading other countries and killing their citizens, THEN America can have its guns back. After all, there are countries out there which manage to combine high rates of gun ownership with low murder rates and peaceful foreign policies - look across the border at Canada, or (if you can find it on a map) Switzerland.

Unlike Canadians and Swiss, however, Americans have shown themselves up to be a nation of paranoid psychotics willing to use deadly force upon each other and the rest of the world. And as a citizen of a country which lies increasingly under American political and cultural dominance, I'm sick of it.
BorisTheFerret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 11:34 am   #253 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Well, it seems appeals to emotion are all that are valid in here anymore?

Obviously data and logic are not currencies accepted anymore?

Where are the facts that show removing guns reduces crime? Oh, thats right, non-existent. In fact, reducing guns INCREASES crime, and INCREASES the number of innocent victims OF CRIME, it just disarms them and puts them at the mercy of their CRIMINAL ATTACKERS.

You people can talk about death rates, murder rates, blah blah blah all you want, you have no facts to support your arguments, gun control has been proven a myth, and many of those living in nations NOW disarmed, are seriously regretting their choices to back such absurd legislation.

I own my firearms, and I will never surrender them, unless there is VALID evidence against me comitting a crime against the rights of another.

You want my firearms, too bad.
You want to empower people to take them, shame on you, cause that will be blood on your hands, not mine.

"A nation of sheep, begets a government of wolves"
H.L. Mencken

Sorry, I am no sheep, intend to be no sheep, and refuse to abide by the ignorance of other sheep even if they all do want to pull their pants down to be raped by the criminals of society.....

The anti-gunners here have lost any respect I may have had for them, but some of them knew that already.... respect isn't an issue for them since they have treated gun owners, no matter how law abiding and peaceful with no respect since day one.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 06:17 pm   #254 (permalink) (top)
Sonart
It's simply logical
 
Sonart's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,117
.

Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary
What the hells to stop a criminal from getting a gun?
In the U.S. ?? LOL!! Certainly not a lack of availability.

Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary
Any one who wants a gun just has to take a jont down to mexico and sneak an arsenal up.
You have it exactly back-asswards.

US guns arm Mexico's drug wars

.


I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it
Sonart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 07:53 pm   #255 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
Not Machine Washable
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,091
Quote:
Quote by: Sonart View Post

HA! That does more to implicate Democrats, and Republicans than anything else.


Quote:
Quote by: Sonart View Post
You have it exactly back-asswards.

Wrong.


However, keep cheering for the bad guys atop your self created ( yet fictional ) moral high horse.


Liberalism - The philosophy for the person only a Nanny State could love.

Economic -5.25 Libertarian/Authoritarian -3.90
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2008, 10:07 pm   #256 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,918
Quote:
In the U.S. ?? LOL!! Certainly not a lack of availability.
There are 875 million firearms in the world, and factories even in strictly gun controlled country's churn out more every day. A truly motivated person almost anywhere besides an institution can access a weapon.

By the way, you still haven't responded to the fact that there's not a ban of a desirable material good in american history that has not created crime, never mind been marginally successful.


“What is the use of straining after an amiable view of things, when a cynical view is most likely to be the true one?”

-George Bernard Shaw

Your friendly neighborhood Mercenary
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2008, 02:03 pm   #257 (permalink) (top)
Sonart
It's simply logical
 
Sonart's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,117
.

Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley
Oh, so it's just bleeding heart Liberalism. Message recieved.
Wow, now there's a hell of an rebuttal to Aussie's point.

Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley
Wrong.
It's interesting how I'm the one who attached a source to my statement while Milton couldn't be bothered, yet I'm wrong.

A fascinating universe you have here.

Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary
There are 875 million firearms in the world,...
And about 200 million of them, a bit less than 25%, are here, in the United States. That means that a 20th of the world's population possesses a quarter of it's non-military firearms.

And you question why we're the most murderous civilized nation on earth? (guns - being invented and designed to kill from a distance - vastly increase the percentage of deaths involved in violent crimes)

Quote:
Quote by: Gods_Mercenary
...and factories even in strictly gun controlled country's churn out more every day. A truly motivated person almost anywhere besides an institution can access a weapon.
And yet, in countries with stricter gun control, there's far fewer deaths. Yada, yada, yada...

that 800 lb gorilla is still sitting there, smack in the middle of the room.

Quote:
Quote by: Osborn
Where are the facts that show removing guns reduces crime?
What the facts show, Osborn, is that we are simultaneously the most heavily armed nation on earth and among the most murderous and violent. Period.

And by the way, statistics show a wash... increased defenses with guns balance with increased crimes involving guns, and, more importantly, more deaths because of guns.

The rest of those facts simply reflect the overall crime level, which usually corresponds with the overall economy. Times are good, crimes go down, times get tough, crimes go up.



Quote:
Quote by: Osborn
In fact, reducing guns INCREASES crime, and INCREASES the number of innocent victims OF CRIME, it just disarms them and puts them at the mercy of their CRIMINAL ATTACKERS.
Is that right?

7. The Criminal's Companion, Florida's Concealed Weapons Law—A Model for the Nation? -- Between the months of October 1987 and July 1995, a total of 469 individuals were identified as having committed crimes—including assault with intent to murder, kidnaping/attempted kidnaping, and shooting with intent to wound—either before obtaining the Florida concealed carry license or after having been licensed.

8. Real-World Effects of Lax Concealed Weapons Laws --
In the period surveyed, an additional 149 individuals had their licenses revoked for crimes committed either before or after their concealed weapons license was issued. The crimes included aggravated assault with a firearm, robbery, domestic battery, and criminal sexual conduct. [/b]

9. Arrests Involving Texas Concealed Handgun License Holders -- Two years after Texas' "shall-issue" concealed handgun license law went into effect, more than 940 arrest records existed involving concealed handgun license holders. This study examines the arrest records for this group for the period between January 1996 and October 1997.

* From January 1996 to October 1997 Texas concealed handgun license holders were arrested for 946 crimes, including 263 felony arrests.
* Among the felony arrests, there were: six charges of murder or attempted murder involving four deaths; two charges of kidnaping; 18 charges of sexual assault; 66 assault charges, including 49 for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon; and 42 weapons-related charges.
* In the first six months of 1997 the weapon-related arrest rate among concealed handgun license holders was more than twice as high as that of the general population of Texas aged 21 years and older.


10. An Update on Arrests of Texas Concealed Handgun License Holders -- * In the period surveyed, more than one thousand additional Texas license holders had been arrested, bringing the total for both reports to 2,080.
* The arrests included 15 charges of murder or attempted murder, 28 arrests for rape/sexual assault, 30 arrests for indecency with children, and 103 arrests for assault with a deadly weapon.


Quote:
Quote by: Gods _Mercenary
By the way, you still haven't responded to the fact that there's not a ban of a desirable material good in american history that has not created crime, never mind been marginally successful.
In the last 40 years there's been an almost 50% drop in the number of Americans who smoke, yet cigarettes have never been banned.

It's about changing Americans attitudes towards guns, which is already happening. Fewer and fewer American households own firearms. We should accelerate that trend, first and foremost by making clear that we do NOT have a constitutional right to own firearms.

If that changes in June, then Americans should work to overturn the Roberts Court Ruling, and return to the current standing Supreme Court case law precedent.

.


I don't suffer from insanity... I thoroughly enjoy it
Sonart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2008, 03:46 pm   #258 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
Not Machine Washable
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,091
You know Sonart, nobody has attempted to refute your statistics, so why do you keep posting them? What we are refuting are those "facts" that you infer from those statistics.


I know, it's so you don't have to respond to any questions that you don't like, or can't address due to other inconvenient truths.


Liberalism - The philosophy for the person only a Nanny State could love.

Economic -5.25 Libertarian/Authoritarian -3.90

Last edited by Milton Bradley; May 10, 2008 at 04:09 pm.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2008, 05:43 pm   #259 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,918
Quote:
And yet, in countries with stricter gun control, there's far fewer deaths. Yada, yada, yada...

that 800 lb gorilla is still sitting there, smack in the middle of the room.
I'll take the 800 pound gorilla on the sofa over the 5 ton Elephant of government on my chest.

Quote:
In the last 40 years there's been an almost 50% drop in the number of Americans who smoke, yet cigarettes have never been banned.

It's about changing Americans attitudes towards guns, which is already happening. Fewer and fewer American households own firearms. We should accelerate that trend, first and foremost by making clear that we do NOT have a constitutional right to own firearms.

If that changes in June, then Americans should work to overturn the Roberts Court Ruling, and return to the current standing Supreme Court case law precedent.
Smoking cigarettes is inherently harmful, first of all, keeping a gun for self defense isn't. The problem is that we do have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms, as most judges have agreed. Second of all, the people don't have the ability to directly overturn a court ruling, the forefathers had some insight there as well.


“What is the use of straining after an amiable view of things, when a cynical view is most likely to be the true one?”

-George Bernard Shaw

Your friendly neighborhood Mercenary
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2008, 10:26 am   #260 (permalink) (top)
Winter wind
Trenchcoat Mickey
 
Winter wind's Avatar
 
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 1,642
I'm really just cleaning up the bad debate

Quote:
Quote by: OFE
Where are the facts that show removing guns reduces crime? Oh, thats right, non-existent. In fact, reducing guns INCREASES crime, and INCREASES the number of innocent victims OF CRIME, it just disarms them and puts them at the mercy of their CRIMINAL ATTACKERS.
Yet you don't post your sources. Could you please post a few?
And my argument is that you have to go all the way or just forget it.

Quote:
Quote by: MB
However, keep cheering for the bad guys atop your self created ( yet fictional ) moral high horse.
Quote:
Oh, so it's just bleeding heart Liberalism.


Message recieved.
Stop venting on the liberals. They aren't in office.

They also comprise around 50% of your country, so get used to working with them.

Also, what's your take on thinks like grenade launchers and modified AK-47s being available to the public?


Don't forget this is all in good fun!

"No matter if it is a white cat or a black cat; as long as it can catch mice, it is a good cat."

Deng Xiaoping
Winter wind is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts