Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Breaking News


This topic in Breaking News is about Iran has reached nuclear milestone: Ahmadinejad.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 8, 2007, 11:20 am   #1 (permalink) (top)
Praxius
Mass'Debator
 
Praxius's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,724
Iran has reached nuclear milestone: Ahmadinejad



CTV.ca | Iran has reached nuclear milestone: Ahmadinejad

Quote:
Iran has reached a milestone in its nuclear program, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Wednesday, suggesting that the country now has 3,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges fully operating.

"We have now reached 3,000 machines," Ahmadinejad told thousands of Iranians gathered in Birjand, in eastern Iran, in a show of defiance of international demands to halt the program that the U.S. and its allies say masks the country's nuclear arms efforts.

Ahmadinejad has in the past claimed that Iran had succeeded in installing the 3,000 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.

But Wednesday's claim appeared to go further, with Ahmadinejad's words and the tone and setting of his Wednesday speech suggesting he meant all 3,000 were running.


An official with knowledge of Iran's nuclear activities said that Iran does now have nearly 3,000 centrifuges operating at Natanz. But that official said it would take years for all the centrifuges to run smoothly without frequent breakdowns.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the sensitive program.

The number 3,000 is the commonly accepted figure for a nuclear enrichment program that is past the experimental stage and can be used as a platform for a full industrial-scale program that could churn out enough enriched material for dozens of nuclear weapons, [red]should Iran chose to go the route.[/red]

Experts have estimated Iran would need only 1,500 centrifuges to produce one such warhead.

In Washington, the State Department could not confirm the accuracy of Ahmadinejad's statement but said it was proof that that Iran was continuing to defy international demands.

"Generally, the Iranians have followed through on doing what they said they were going to do," spokesman Sean McCormack said. "That isn't to say that I am aware that they have reached the 3,000 centrifuge mark, but they have been very consistent in pushing toward the goals they have laid out for themselves."

"Whether it is 2,000 or 2,500 or 3,000 or 1,000 centrifuges, the irrefutable fact is that they are continuing to defy the international community, that they have refused the offers of negotiations and cooperation offered them," McCormack said.

A recent report by International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei that had put the number of centrifuges working in Natanz at close to 2,000, with another 650 being tested.

Officials from the Vienna-based agency could not be reached for immediate comment Wednesday.

Uranium gas, spun in linked centrifuges, can result in either low-enriched fuel suitable to generate power in a nuclear reactor, or the weapons-grade material that forms the fissile core of nuclear warheads.

Tehran denies that Iran is using its civilian nuclear program as a cover for weapons' development, insisting it is geared toward generating electricity.

[red]Iran says it plans to expand its enrichment program to up to 54,000 centrifuges at Natanz in central Iran, and is fully within its rights to pursue the enrichment to produce fuel under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.[/red]

Two rounds of UN Security Council sanctions have failed to persuade Iran to halt the enrichment.

Ahmadinejad on Wednesday reiterated his rejection of any suspension of Iran's enrichment activities, or even a compromise over how Tehran will proceed beyond the 3,000 centrifuges.

"The world must know that this nation will not give up one iota of its nuclear rights," he said. "If they think they can get concessions from this nation, they are badly mistaken."
The funny thing here is above they even admitted that When Iran says they are going to do something, they follow through..... so if they say they are not planning on nuclear weapons..... where's the contradiction in reasoning that perhaps they are truly not?

It's true most view them as always wanting to be a bigger role in the middle east, therefore if they were going to develop nukes.... don't you think they'd be like N.Korea and shoving it in our faces and egging us on to go do something about it? Seems to be the thing to do when you want to beef up your country as being tough these days.

Their refusal of any outside assistance or co-operation seems logical, since the hostage crisis and their acusations of outside forces destabalizing their nation's direction..... I wouldn't trust outside help either.
Praxius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2007, 12:23 pm   #2 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Praxius View Post
don't you think they'd be like N.Korea and shoving it in our faces and egging us on to go do something about it?
Um, NK started doing that AFTER they developed a nuclear weapon...up until then, they lied through their teeth and claimed they weren't working on it...... potentially similiar to Iran?


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2007, 12:24 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
OH NO, call out the bombers, alert the world, the end is near!

........

Yea, anyway.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2007, 02:18 pm   #4 (permalink) (top)
jose
Volcanic Erupter
 
Location: Espaņa
Posts: 2,608
Iran is in the process of building power stations, which it is allowed to do under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which the United States and Iran (but not Israel) have signed. Under the NNPT Iran has the right to produce their own fuel

Nobody has presented any proof that Iran is doing anything other than building a power station. They do not have a weapons laboratory hidden underneath their reactor (unlike Israel, which has a no-longer-secret weapons plant underneath the reactor at Dimona). The IAEA has declared that Iran is not making weapons.
jose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2007, 03:09 pm   #5 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: jose View Post
The IAEA has declared that Iran is not making weapons.
Just curious...when/where did they declare that?


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2007, 03:16 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
Praxius
Mass'Debator
 
Praxius's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,724
Quote:
Quote by: Dieval View Post
Just curious...when/where did they declare that?
I was gonna see if there was information in regards to this, but I found something even better:

Infact this diserves it's own thread......
Praxius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 08:44 am   #7 (permalink) (top)
jose
Volcanic Erupter
 
Location: Espaņa
Posts: 2,608
Quote:
Quote by: Dieval View Post
Just curious...when/where did they declare that?
Quote:
Iran does not possess nuclear weapons, or even weapons-grade uranium. On March 6, 2006, Mohamed ElBaradei, Director General of the IAEA, reported that "the Agency has not seen indications of diversion of nuclear material to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices ... however, after three years of intensive verification, there remain uncertainties with regard to both the scope and the nature of Iran's nuclear programme".
Iran and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
jose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 11:27 am   #8 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Wikipedia...interesting reference....

It's funny how Iran is continually trying to enrich uranium, which is needed for nuclear weapons, even though the UN and many other countries(including the US) are asking them to stop.....they could BUY enriched uranium, which the UN could monitor and be assured that it wasn't being used for nuclear weapons, cheaper than it costs to make the stuff....yet the funny thing is, they refuse....hmmmm... gotta wonder about that.

You're also siting a source that was written prior to the article that was posted??


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 12:35 pm   #9 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
I personally, gotta wonder how a NATION that has the GNP of Indiana, the State in the U.S., is a threat to anyone.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 12:46 pm   #10 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
I personally, gotta wonder how a NATION that has the GNP of Indiana, the State in the U.S., is a threat to anyone.
I'm curious as to how you think Indiana has a NATIONAL anything? Let alone how you thought comparing a country in the middle east, (which has a completely different ideals, economy, currency, etc, etc, etc) and a STATE in the US would be even remotely valid.


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 12:48 pm   #11 (permalink) (top)
Praxius
Mass'Debator
 
Praxius's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,724
Quote:
Quote by: Dieval View Post
Wikipedia...interesting reference....

It's funny how Iran is continually trying to enrich uranium, which is needed for nuclear weapons, even though the UN and many other countries(including the US) are asking them to stop.....they could BUY enriched uranium, which the UN could monitor and be assured that it wasn't being used for nuclear weapons, cheaper than it costs to make the stuff....yet the funny thing is, they refuse....hmmmm... gotta wonder about that.
It's called wanting independance, and perhaps in the long run, producing their own will be cheaper and they can then start their own market.

And Continually trying to enrich Uranium which you claim is needed for nuclear weapons, is also needed for nuclear energy.... and from the link and article I posted yesterday:

Quote:
It says the report was wrong to say that Iran had enriched uranium to weapons-grade level when the IAEA had only found small quantities of enrichment at far lower levels.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | US Iran report branded dishonest

I think the guys who actually went in and who's job it is to do these sort of things would know a bit more about what is going on, then Bush sitting in his White House listening to hearsay from his minions' speculations and Bush shooting off from his arse about things he has not only been wrong in the past about, but he's wrong about today.
Praxius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 01:28 pm   #12 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Quote:
Dieval said:
I'm curious as to how you think Indiana has a NATIONAL anything? Let alone how you thought comparing a country in the middle east, (which has a completely different ideals, economy, currency, etc, etc, etc) and a STATE in the US would be even remotely valid.
It is only valid as an issue of comparison. Iran poses NO direct threat to the U.S., except in threatening allies with whom we should not be in entangling alliances with anyway.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 01:34 pm   #13 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
It is only valid as an issue of comparison. Iran poses NO direct threat to the U.S., except in threatening allies with whom we should not be in entangling alliances with anyway.
Saying that Iran's GNP is the same as Indiana doesn't in ANYWAY prove that they are not threat to us.


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 01:39 pm   #14 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Praxius View Post
It's called wanting independance, and perhaps in the long run, producing their own will be cheaper and they can then start their own market.
Enriching uranium is HIGHLY discouraged by the UN, IAEA, and everyone else because it IS used in making nuclear weapons and the amounts that have been enriched aren't monitored. Even though you have a blind hatred for the US and our President, you can easily see that this is a problem.


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 01:43 pm   #15 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Quote:
Dieval said:
Saying that Iran's GNP is the same as Indiana doesn't in ANYWAY prove that they are not threat to us.
I didn't say it proved anything. I had provided it as a matter of comparison.

Nothing Iran has done or said PROVES they are a threat to the U.S.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 02:07 pm   #16 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
I didn't say it proved anything. I had provided it as a matter of comparison.

Nothing Iran has done or said PROVES they are a threat to the U.S.
You used an invalid comparrison to imply they're not a threat to anyone.

Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
I personally, gotta wonder how a NATION that has the GNP of Indiana, the State in the U.S., is a threat to anyone.
Let me give you an example using your logic:
The apple is red. The tomato is red. Therefore you're a banana.


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 02:12 pm   #17 (permalink) (top)
Osborn F Enready
Principled Observer
 
Osborn F Enready's Avatar
 
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 13,873
Quote:
Dieval said:
You used an invalid comparrison to imply they're not a threat to anyone.
I was pointing out that they are barely able to affect their own society, much less others societies.

That is a valid point.

Quote:
Dieval said:
Let me give you an example using your logic:
The apple is red. The tomato is red. Therefore you're a banana.
I would accept your giving an example, if you did it correctly.

You have shown NO proof, nor has any government shown proof of why Iran is a threat to the U.S.


Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm

Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/


Osborn F. Enready
Osborn F Enready is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 02:23 pm   #18 (permalink) (top)
Praxius
Mass'Debator
 
Praxius's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,724
Quote:
Quote by: Dieval View Post
Enriching uranium is HIGHLY discouraged by the UN, IAEA, and everyone else because it IS used in making nuclear weapons and the amounts that have been enriched aren't monitored. Even though you have a blind hatred for the US and our President, you can easily see that this is a problem.
No I can't because you don't know what you're talking about, nor have you provided a shred of evidence to support any of your claims.

Enriching Uranium is a required technique for both Nuclear Energy and Weapons.... you can not have a decent nuclear power plant without enriching uranium, which you seem to be avoiding as a fact.

Allow me to educate you on this matter:

Enriched uranium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
.....Enriched uranium is a critical component for both civil nuclear power generation and military nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) attempts to monitor and control enriched uranium supplies and processes in its efforts to ensure nuclear power generation safety and curb nuclear weapons proliferation.....
Enriching Uranimum by the IAEA is monitored and controlled.... not as you put it "HIGHLY discouraged"

In fact, if you would like some pretty pie graphs to show the differences in Enriched Uranium:



As you can see there is a big difference between enriched uranium for weapons, and enriched uranium for energy.... and as the IAEA stated in their official report:

Quote:
It says the report was wrong to say that Iran had enriched uranium to weapons-grade level when the IAEA had only found small quantities of enrichment at far lower levels.
Do the math, read the information and tell me.... no.... present to me your evidence that they are developing for Nuclear Weapons.

The fact is, you can't.
Praxius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 02:43 pm   #19 (permalink) (top)
Dieval
Right of Center
 
Dieval's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
I was pointing out that they are barely able to affect their own society, much less others societies.

That is a valid point.
That isn't quite what you said, but going on that premise, if money is such an issue for them, why are they taking the more expensive and more controversal way of enriching their own urnaium, rather than buying tightly controlled and monitored amounts that are more than sufficient for their needs?


Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready View Post
I would accept your giving an example, if you did it correctly.

You have shown NO proof, nor has any government shown proof of why Iran is a threat to the U.S.
The IAEA is suspicious of their behaviour. Iran's actions in regards to their nuclear program are highly suspect if for no other reason then what was mentioned above.


"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." -- Winston Churchill
Dieval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 14, 2007, 02:48 pm   #20 (permalink) (top)
grandpa
blasphemer
 
grandpa's Avatar
 
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,946
Quote:
Quote by: Praxius View Post
No I can't because you don't know what you're talking
about, nor have you provided a shred of evidence to
support any of your claims.
Enriching Uranium is a required technique for both Nuclear Energy
and Weapons....
Even if Iran is seeking a weapons program, or could potentially do it, that's not an instant excuse to attack them, or any other country. It's common sense that any attack against Iran could end up killing many, many people.

Grandpa h.


Do unto others as you would have them do unto you (unless it costs
something).
grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 am.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Online Gambling, KFUPM ePrints, Double Glazing UK, Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Beauty Salons, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVe