Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Breaking News


This topic in Breaking News is about Deadly shooting at US university.

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 18, 2007, 07:52 pm   #141 (permalink) (top)
fushigi
Hot Lava
 
fushigi's Avatar
 
Location: Beijing
Posts: 2,340
Uh, my comment was that the state of emergency wasn't necessary. I'd say that's pretty much in line with saying long arguments about gun control, immigration, Prozac, and any other topic using this event as their primary argument are completely unfounded.


"What truth endures beneath the flaming stream?"
-- A Volcano, Bartolome de Las Casas, Inferno de Marsaya, 1536
fushigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2007, 08:42 pm   #142 (permalink) (top)
CoffeeSaint
Moral Turnip
 
CoffeeSaint's Avatar
 
Location: Oregon, US
Posts: 2,283
Quote:
Quote by: brien View Post
Is this because people make statements that aren't true and then others try to prop it up? Is it because I have proved those statements to be patently false? I promptly admit when I am wrong but apparently when others are proven wrong around here, they feel no such obligation. So be it.
The only reason his statement wasn't true was because you made a distinction between "prevented" and "greatly reduced the death toll." That's a nit, and you picked it. Now, you want to pick nits, that's fine; I've done it myself, more than once. But just pick the sucker and move on -- don't drag it out for half a dozen posts, denying the allegations from the other side when the only ground you have to stand on is a slight semantic distinction.

Patently false, my aunt Fanny.

I think maybe we should branch this entire discussion out, start all of these threads we're mentioning here, rather than keep tying them into this thread. I think this one would be best used for updates. In fact, I'm going to go post in the Outburst Violence thread right now.


"Would you like some pie, Dr. Stark?"

"Science is my pie. Curiosity, my sweet tooth.
Knowledge is my candy."
CoffeeSaint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2007, 09:51 pm   #143 (permalink) (top)
ZNFYRH
Volcanic Erupter
 
ZNFYRH's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,375
Thank goodness I've been sticking with the stance of waiting for more information.

Jason's post #136 is the type of thing I've been waiting for.
ZNFYRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2007, 09:55 pm   #144 (permalink) (top)
Slevin57
Igneous Magma
 
Slevin57's Avatar
 
Posts: 419
The state of emergency was declared to allow for any extra government assistance that would not normally be provided. I.e. the national guard if the situation had turned out badly.

It's possible that people could have reacted in rage instead of grief.


-Chris

"I guess we are the people our parents warned us about."
Slevin57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2007, 10:58 pm   #145 (permalink) (top)
Chris
Gamma-ray burst
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
The answer is none.

And of course incidents like this could be reduced if not eliminated. Remove the ability to easily aquire guns and you remove the threat of random spree shootings.
In the past decade you are right But in 1996 -

CBC News In Depth: School shootings

March 13, 1996:
Dunblane Primary School, Dunblane, Scotland

Quote:
A 43-year-old unemployed former storeowner, Thomas Hamilton, cuts the telephone lines to Dunblane Primary School in central Scotland and enters, armed with two pistols, two revolvers and more than 700 cartridges. He begins shooting in the school gymnasium, killing a teacher and 16 children many of them under the age of six. Subsequent investigation found that Hamilton had been a former Scout leader who had questioned by police several times after complaints about his behaviour around young children. The controversy surrounding the tragedy led to tighter gun controls.

Not nearly as much as the US though. There are a few in Canada though.


Delusion- A persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. (i.e. religion)

Shared
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2007, 11:10 pm   #146 (permalink) (top)
fushigi
Hot Lava
 
fushigi's Avatar
 
Location: Beijing
Posts: 2,340
Perhaps the ONLY relevant thing to debate coming out of this event is whether or not people on anti-depressants should be allowed to purchase firearms. It's much like Socrates' argument from The Republic:
Quote:
Quote by: Socrates
Ought I, for example, to put back into the hands of my friend, who has gone mad, the sword which I borrowed of him when he was in his right mind?
Of course, this brings up many privacy issues - when Americans' medical history starts to interfere with their right to own firearms.


"What truth endures beneath the flaming stream?"
-- A Volcano, Bartolome de Las Casas, Inferno de Marsaya, 1536
fushigi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 09:11 am   #147 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
Double post


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 09:12 am   #148 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post

A pedantic nit-pick, and utterly worthless.
When I am correct, you anti gunners call it a dodge and a nit pick.:rolleyes: Talk about worthless.


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 09:21 am   #149 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
Quote:
The only reason his statement wasn't true was because you made a distinction between "prevented" and "greatly reduced the death toll." That's a nit, and you picked it
The next time I make a statements and other prove it isn't true, I will call it nit picking. Right. There is a big difference between prevention and mitigation in the law. Try telling your sorry excuse to a judge and see what the law does in a case where something is mitigated rather than prevented. Why can't you people just admit when you are wrong. What the guy wrote was wrong. I yi yi :rolleyes:

Edit to add. It is worthless to waste my time with such arrogant people who can't admit their mistakes.


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.

Last edited by brien; Apr 19, 2007 at 09:47 am.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 10:06 am   #150 (permalink) (top)
pikatore
A Celestial Monkey
 
pikatore's Avatar
 
Location: In England
Posts: 1,608
It's even more hilarious how you stubbornly deny any message in the link I gave you, implied or not, about how tradegies like this would be prevented had the students be allowed to carry arms on campus.

It's not our problem if you can't see that message. Or maybe you do, and you are just too plain stubborn to see that the whole POINT of that rant in the link was to FURTHER a pro-gun agenda.

I haven't made any mistakes. I never made any false quotes, and I made a decent claim. So stop being a jerk. I'm not arrogant.


"Cheese is a kind of meat, a tasty yellow beef" - Mighty Boosh

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.38
pikatore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 10:20 am   #151 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
Quote:
Quote by: pikatore View Post
It.

I haven't made any mistakes. I never made any false quotes, and I made a decent claim. So stop being a jerk. I'm not arrogant.
Talk about a stubborn jerk. You aren't man enough to admit your error in making a statement that simply isn't true. I proved it but you are so arrogant you can't admit your mistake. Your method of attacking me rather than admitting your mistake is a tired old denial that is quite transparrent and is simply childish. I refuse to debate people who can't or simly won't admit their mistakes because they argue from a false premise so it pre-empts me from participation. Sorry about that.


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 10:32 am   #152 (permalink) (top)
ZNFYRH
Volcanic Erupter
 
ZNFYRH's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,375
Can you guys knock it off or does the warning need to be official?
ZNFYRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 11:09 am   #153 (permalink) (top)
Zeebadee
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 3,771
Quote:
Quote by: brien View Post
When I am correct, you anti gunners call it a dodge and a nit pick.:rolleyes: Talk about worthless.
I called it a dodge because I made specific comments about your posts concerning THIS event, and you claimed the mods asked you not to discuss past shooting instances. And your out-of-context and unattributed quotes don't help.


"Everybody knows that the boat is leaking
Everybody knows that the captain lied." - Leonard Cohen
Zeebadee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 12:07 pm   #154 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
I merely complied with the mod. Call it what ever you wish. My views upon firearms can be found in other threads that are now ongoing.


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:22 pm   #155 (permalink) (top)
KSoDBartman
B.S. Detector
 
Location: The River Cocytus
Posts: 44
Quote:
Quote by: Chris the Chees View Post
A pedantic nit-pick, and utterly worthless.
Somehow I doubt the individuals who might have been spared if someone had taken this fool down before the cops finally got there would consider their life a pedantic nit.
KSoDBartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:25 pm   #156 (permalink) (top)
KSoDBartman
B.S. Detector
 
Location: The River Cocytus
Posts: 44
My take on this whole gun situation is this: VT removed from students and staff the ability to defend themselves by banning guns on campus. As such, VT should assume the responsibility of ensuring their safety. When they fail, as they obviously did in this case, a fine should be imposed for victim restitution.

When you compel someone to give up their ability to defend themself, you become responsible for their defense.
KSoDBartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:26 pm   #157 (permalink) (top)
pikatore
A Celestial Monkey
 
pikatore's Avatar
 
Location: In England
Posts: 1,608
Quote:
Quote by: KSoDBartman View Post
Somehow I doubt the individuals who might have been spared if someone had taken this fool down before the cops finally got there would consider their life a pedantic nit.
... you obviously came in here late.

The fact remains, that this fool bought his guns from the local store legally, and was able to waltz on campus and open fire.

If there are going to be psycho nutbags like this guy, do you think the possibility they will get into a firefight faze them one tiny little bit??? Do you really??


"Cheese is a kind of meat, a tasty yellow beef" - Mighty Boosh

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.38
pikatore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:29 pm   #158 (permalink) (top)
KSoDBartman
B.S. Detector
 
Location: The River Cocytus
Posts: 44
Quote:
Quote by: pikatore View Post
... you obviously came in here late.

The fact remains, that this fool bought his guns from the local store legally, and was able to waltz on campus and open fire.

If there are going to be psycho nutbags like this guy, do you think the possibility they will get into a firefight faze them one tiny little bit??? Do you really??
I don't think you read for comprehension.
KSoDBartman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:30 pm   #159 (permalink) (top)
ZNFYRH
Volcanic Erupter
 
ZNFYRH's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,375
Quote:
Quote by: KSoDBartman
if someone had taken this fool down before the cops finally got there
And how, pray tell, would someone have "taken the fool down" if they didn't know of his prior actions that day and he wasn't openly brandishing firearms before the second shooting?
ZNFYRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2007, 02:31 pm   #160 (permalink) (top)
pikatore
A Celestial Monkey
 
pikatore's Avatar
 
Location: In England
Posts: 1,608
Quote:
Quote by: KSoDBartman View Post
As such, VT should assume the responsibility of ensuring their safety. When they fail, as they obviously did in this case, a fine should be imposed for victim restitution.
That, my friend, is ridiculous.

Unless the place is locked down like a bloody prison, and everyone totes a gun (which is something that i find quite disturbing), you won't stop crazy dudes like this one from doing thier thing.


"Cheese is a kind of meat, a tasty yellow beef" - Mighty Boosh

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.38
pikatore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 pm.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
Free Online Games, xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Credit Card Debt Consolidation Cheap Loan Personal Loan Libros medicina Myspace Codes
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9