Register (it's free)
Volconvo Debate Forums
Advertise Here »
Browse ad-free by donating
The Debate Forums Blogs | Donate Register (it's free) Chatroom Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  
  Volconvo / Debate Forums / Breaking News


This topic in Breaking News is about Aussie President John Howard slams Obama....

Reply  
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:04 pm   #1 (permalink) (top)
The_Genius
~Ruthless Debater~
 
The_Genius's Avatar
 
Location: Cape Town, South Africa.
Posts: 433
Aussie President John Howard slams Obama...

Quote:
SYDNEY, Australia (AP) -- Australia's conservative prime minister slammed U.S. presidential hopeful Barack Obama on Sunday over the candidate's opposition to the Iraq war, saying it encourages terrorists and threatens to destabilize the Middle East.

The first-term U.S. senator announced Saturday that he will run for the White House in 2008, saying the country's first priority should be to end the war in Iraq.

Obama has also introduced a bill to prevent U.S. President George W. Bush from increasing American troop levels in Iraq, and to remove U.S. combat forces from the country by March 31, 2008. (Watch as Obama outlines his plans for Iraq -- 1:12 )

However, the legislation has virtually no chance of becoming law while Bush is president.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard, who will face his own re-election bid later this year, said Obama's policy would spell disaster for the Middle East.

Source: Howard slams Obama on Iraq policy - CNN.com

This afternoon I saw Obama responding by saying USA had provided 160000 troops to Iraq. Australia should've sent 20000 troops since Howard is so concerned about terrorism. However, Australia only sent 1400 troops...

John Coward retaliated by saying Australia is smaller than USA in size and population.
The_Genius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:06 pm   #2 (permalink) (top)
RickSp
Volcanic Erupter
 
RickSp's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,491
Howard's stupidity is a gift to Obama. What more could a junior Senator ask than to be taken seriously by a world leader?


Rick

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." Sinclair Lewis
RickSp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 03:47 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
GHook93
Aristotle
 
GHook93's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,117
Quote:
Quote by: RickSp View Post
Howard's stupidity is a gift to Obama. What more could a junior Senator ask than to be taken seriously by a world leader?
Only was to Obama's benefit, because he came back appropriately and made Howard look like a fool.
GHook93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 05:24 pm   #4 (permalink) (top)
notworthabean
libertarian neocon
 
Location: north east
Posts: 630
Quote:
Quote by: The_Genius View Post
Source: Howard slams Obama on Iraq policy - CNN.com

This afternoon I saw Obama responding by saying USA had provided 160000 troops to Iraq. Australia should've sent 20000 troops since Howard is so concerned about terrorism. However, Australia only sent 1400 troops...

John Coward retaliated by saying Australia is smaller than USA in size and population.
howard has a point re the populaiton, not to mention the aussies handle a lot of s.e. asia as well.
notworthabean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 06:02 pm   #5 (permalink) (top)
Gods_Mercenary
Altruism Assassin
 
Gods_Mercenary's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,871
Quote:
Quote by: The_Genius View Post
Source: Howard slams Obama on Iraq policy - CNN.com

This afternoon I saw Obama responding by saying USA had provided 160000 troops to Iraq. Australia should've sent 20000 troops since Howard is so concerned about terrorism. However, Australia only sent 1400 troops...

John Coward retaliated by saying Australia is smaller than USA in size and population.
That's rich, I doubt that australia couldn't have spared a few more thousans troops, saying that they were too smart to get too involved in such a disaster would have been better.


“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”
-Albert Einstein
Gods_Mercenary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2007, 11:06 pm   #6 (permalink) (top)
tinybear
Volcanic Erupter
 
tinybear's Avatar
 
Location: Hong Kong (for now)
Posts: 7,006
Obama is just another politician saying what the electorate wants to hear: end the war in Iraq and bring the boys home. I must admit that sounds very very attractive.
tinybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 02:33 am   #7 (permalink) (top)
The_Genius
~Ruthless Debater~
 
The_Genius's Avatar
 
Location: Cape Town, South Africa.
Posts: 433
Howard does look like an idiot now, well he always was one. He is bidding for a 5th term in australian perliament and that sounds quite inapropiate to me.
The_Genius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 10:09 am   #8 (permalink) (top)
GHook93
Aristotle
 
GHook93's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,117
Quote:
Quote by: tinybear View Post
Obama is just another politician saying what the electorate wants to hear: end the war in Iraq and bring the boys home. I must admit that sounds very very attractive.
Please, he spoke out against the war before we invaded Iraq. Remember most Americans back then we for it. Shit most citizens of Illinois (remember he is a IL senator) were for the war. This is going against the public. This guy is sticking by his guns.

He openly admitted to experimenting with drugs. He didn't do the Texas 2 step like Clinton (I never inhaled) or GWB, Obama admitted it. Which is again not telling the people what they want to hear.

Your assessment is wrong. If anything Obama is a breath of fresh air with his honesty and openness!
GHook93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 10:28 am   #9 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: GHook93 View Post
If anything Obama is a breath of fresh air with his honesty and openness!

Does that trump the policies he supports? ( Assuming you are not completly in support of his positions. )


Personally, I still see him as a Statists, and no matter how candid one may appear, he's never going to win my vote.
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 10:50 am   #10 (permalink) (top)
Mason
NORML
 
Mason's Avatar
 
Location: VA
Posts: 21
I'd vote for Obama due to his lack of experience. In my eyes what we have at the moment isn't working. Get a fresh mind and fresh view in there. At worst we see a politician turn from fresh face to fall on face. At best, we get some things done as a country.
Mason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 12:57 pm   #11 (permalink) (top)
GHook93
Aristotle
 
GHook93's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,117
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
Does that trump the policies he supports? ( Assuming you are not completly in support of his positions. )
Explain what policy in particular your talking about?

Iraq war? On am on the fense
Universal Health care? 100% support
Etc.

Name the one your talking about!

Quote:
Personally, I still see him as a Statists, and no matter how candid one may appear, he's never going to win my vote.
I am sure he will survive without your support, especially one with such demented views of 9/11!
GHook93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 01:17 pm   #12 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: GHook93 View Post
Explain what policy in particular your talking about?

Obviously I was painting with a rather braod brush there, and that question is worded in the rhetorical sense, so that one could articulate their own response, in their own wrords about any policy they might have had issues with.


Truly, it was completey rhetorical, sort of in a comedic "I don't get you guys" type angle.


Quote:
Quote by: GHook93 View Post
I am sure he will survive without your support, especially one with such demented views of 9/11!

Now I'm demented, am I? Damn, we need an icon specifically for that.


Well, at least know that your free to speak your mind to me, and that I'll never flag your post for being "provocative", or "name calling".
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 01:26 pm   #13 (permalink) (top)
GHook93
Aristotle
 
GHook93's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,117
Quote:
Quote by: Milton Bradley View Post
Obviously I was painting with a rather braod brush there, and that question is worded in the rhetorical sense, so that one could articulate their own response, in their own wrords about any policy they might have had issues with.


Truly, it was completey rhetorical, sort of in a comedic "I don't get you guys" type angle.





Now I'm demented, am I? Damn, we need an icon specifically for that.


Well, at least know that your free to speak your mind to me, and that I'll never flag your post for being "provocative", or "name calling".
You just posted on the Canadian troop pull-out that 9/11 was committed by the US government (or you at least strongly inferred that). I call that demented,
GHook93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 02:24 pm   #14 (permalink) (top)
Milton Bradley
BANNED
 
Location: Ohio Province, Rep. of Comerica
Posts: 7,320
Quote:
Quote by: GHook93 View Post
You just posted on the Canadian troop pull-out that 9/11 was committed by the US government (or you at least strongly inferred that). I call that demented,

You are welcome to your own definitions.


Notice that I never tried to correct you, or invite further discussion on that matter. I'm perfectly content to agree to disagree on this matter.


But just for clarification purposes...


Do you completely refuse to entertain the thought that they could have been complicit? Or have you arrived at other conclusions on your own, or just ratioanlized away as "conspiracy"?
Milton Bradley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 04:24 pm   #15 (permalink) (top)
The_Genius
~Ruthless Debater~
 
The_Genius's Avatar
 
Location: Cape Town, South Africa.
Posts: 433
Demented?

I'm surprised Bradley didn't call you a brainwashed puppet that only believes what US media broadcasts.

US government was involved in 9/11... There are many evidences too. I suggest everybody watches the documentary called "Loose Change 9/11". I must stress that this documentary was produced by fellow truth-loving white americans, before Ghook points out it's a "Muslim conspiracy theory".

Here is the website... Loose Change Website - Version 2.0

...yall should actually watch the documentary before screaming out "conspiracy theory". Make up your own mind!
The_Genius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 04:42 pm   #16 (permalink) (top)
brien
Iceberg
 
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,691
Obama is currently polling 24% to Hillary's 28% and John Edward's 13% I don't think Obama will beat Hillary for the nomination. He is young and people will determine he has time in the future to run. And keep in mind, the electorate usually picks its Presidents not from the Senate, but from the Governorships across the nation. The last figure I saw was one in four Presidents have come from the Senate. Watch for Governor Richardson from NM. He knows how the Clintons fight because he was one of them. He has the experience and he doesn't have the baggage of flip flopped statements on the war. I laugh every time I hear Hillary's statements that all contradict one another. It is most amusing.


Quote:
2008 Democratic Presidential Primary
Clinton 28% Obama 23% Edwards 13%

February 12, 2007
Senator Hillary Clinton (D) continues to enjoy frontrunner status and now attracts 28% of the vote from Likely Democratic Primary Voters nationwide. The former First Lady of the nation recently asserted that "I'm the one person [Republicans] are most afraid of. Bill and I have beaten them before and we will again", but the former First Lady continues to lead the Democratic nomination race was pulling away from other contenders for the Democratic nomination, the latest Rasmussen Reports Election 2008 polling shows that the race has stabilized a bit
.

Obama's political gaffaw yesterday didn't win him any admirers either when he labeled the 3000 American deaths in Iraq as "wasted lives." He has apologized for this but I don't think it will garner him any support from the military minded voters. War or no war.


Brien the Iceberg

If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. M.T.
brien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 06:07 pm   #17 (permalink) (top)
Apeman81
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Quote by: The_Genius View Post
Source: Howard slams Obama on Iraq policy - CNN.com

This afternoon I saw Obama responding by saying USA had provided 160000 troops to Iraq. Australia should've sent 20000 troops since Howard is so concerned about terrorism. However, Australia only sent 1400 troops...

John Coward retaliated by saying Australia is smaller than USA in size and population.
The story is representative of the misdirection through selective reporting that feeds into the mass's desire to throw epithets rather than address issues.

"Australia's conservative prime minister slammed U.S. presidential hopeful Barak Obama on Sunday over the candidate's opposition to the Iraq war..."

Minister Howard was indeed not speaking of only Obama's opposition to the war, but rather specifically to Obama's setting a specific date for withdrawal. He correctly asserted that given the circumstances that exist, the idea of setting a certain date for withdrawal, without regard to the achievement of measurable goals representative of victory, is to concede defeat by handing victory to the side willing to simply wait for the opposition to fold up it's tent and go home.

Such an irresponsible position will indeed create the situation in which the lives lost in this war as having been, in Obama’s words, “wasted”
Apeman81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 13, 2007, 07:39 pm   #18 (permalink) (top)
notworthabean
libertarian neocon
 
Location: north east
Posts: 630
Quote:
Quote by: The_Genius View Post
Demented?

I'm surprised Bradley didn't call you a brainwashed puppet that only believes what US media broadcasts.

US government was involved in 9/11... There are many evidences too. I suggest everybody watches the documentary called "Loose Change 9/11". I must stress that this documentary was produced by fellow truth-loving white americans, before Ghook points out it's a "Muslim conspiracy theory".

Here is the website... Loose Change Website - Version 2.0

...yall should actually watch the documentary before screaming out "conspiracy theory". Make up your own mind!
1) this conspriaycy would invovle a very large number of people, the chances of it lasting this long w/o anyoen knowing is nil, esp in america where everyone wants to talk

2) these guys are sil alive.you think the gov't would et a movie like this get this far if they were invovled?

3) Screw Loose Change

4) many many many many engineers agree this works-i am not one, but the vast majority seem to agree-it works.
notworthabean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2007, 01:15 am   #19 (permalink) (top)
rmnunez
Volcanic Erupter
 
rmnunez's Avatar
 
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 4,772
"Obama Bin Laden" non registrable:
Quote:
Government officials have rejected a Florida man's bid to trademark the term "Obama bin Laden," ruling that the conflation of the names of a US Senator and the world's leading terrorist was "scandalous" and wrongly suggested a connection between the politician and the mass murderer. In a February 6 decision, US Patent and Trademark Office attorney Karen K. Bush informed applicant Alexandre Batlle of her decision not to register the trademark. A copy of Bush's notice can be found below. Last month, Batlle, a 28-year-old Miami Beach resident, filed an application to trademark the term for use on hats, shirts, pins, and bumper stickers.

Battle is talented, I don't suppose there'd be a relationship between Karen K. Bush and the infamous united statian president?


Et semel emissum volat irrevocabile verbum.
Raúl M. Núñez Sheriff
rmnunez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 14, 2007, 01:32 am   #20 (permalink) (top)
Compugasm
Son of X51
 
Compugasm's Avatar
 
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
Quote by: rmnunez View Post
I don't suppose tyhere'd be a relationship between Karen K. Bush and the infamous united statian president?
I guess in the early 1900's these kind of political cartoons were novel, considering there were so few media outlets compared to now. However, I'll be happy not to see pictures of Hillary in a burka, like it's some sort of clever political statement. In fact, I feel sad for anyone who thinks pictures of GWB as a monkey is funny. Bonus sadness given to anyone who wastes their hard earned dollars on this useless merchandise.


I'd like to thank Charlie Hodge, bringing me scarves and water.
Compugasm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 am.

Sponsors (become a sponsor)
xango, UK Car Insurance, Beauty Salon, Coach Handbags, Miele Vacuums, Plus Size Bras, Gambling, Bullhorn, Horses for Sale, Ventrilo Server, liquid vitamins, weight loss, Smiley Central, Monetise your website, Ventrilo Server, Dyson Vacuums, Hydroponics & Grow Lights, Offshore banking, beauty salons, Offshore banking, Connecticut Electric Rate, Retail Electric Providers Cirro Energy, LasVegas Vacations, Web Design, homes in hudson, Affordable Web Hosting, Texas Electric Rate Cirro Energy, Security Audit, Guy Factor, Gun Forums, Remortgages Loans Apply for Credit Card Mortgages Problem Mortgage
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

© 2003–2008 Volconvo.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9