Quote:
|
Quote by: Mr.Vicchio Kyoto would do NOTHING, why do you people keep bowing to the alter of ignorance?
Kyoto is bad science, bad economics, IT DOES NOTHING> I cannot wait, figure about 2-4 years for all industries effected by this in signatory countries to move to places where they arne't forced to operate under heavy red tape and expense. Net change, employment up in 3rd world and non-Kyoto treaties, pollution from said business is the same, employment down in origin countries.
What does that SOLVE?
Nothing. |
Kyoto is neither "science" nor "economics", among civilised nations to address the causes of the global warming threat. Of course Bush is not civilised, and I have my doubts about the USA, period.
The USA has a far higher CO2 emissions than any other nation, indeed the USA accounts for 20% of CO2 emissions.
As for your foolish suggestion that Kyoto will in some way be an economic dampener then you are wrong. This kind of agreement leads to investment in alternative energy sources and research. As fossil fuels are
limited investing at this stage is anything but economically unsound. It will be far cheaper to invest now, than pay the consequences later. But while that moron is in the White House progress will always be limited by default, on all issues, after all being stuck in the inefficent past is what conservatism is all about.
But of course neo-conservatives ever have been interested in the short term, and have never looked at the big picture. Typical among the small minded, selfish, individuals who share the neo-conservative mindset.
I also love the fact that you, who knows absolutely nothing about the subject has the nerve to call it “bad science”, when the
vast majority of real scientists are in open support of direct action in combat of this threat.