Quote:
|
Quote by: Mr.Vicchio Climate change that... here's a shocker for you Pooey, happens every day, every year, every decade, every century, every millenium... |
Erm, now you claim to be a metereologist, but somehow you got the same misconception wrong. Weather changes from day to day, but if your climate changed even weekly, it'd wreak havoc on the current biosphere and alot of organisms would've evolved differently. Think again before you make such a silly statement.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Mr.Vicchio The climate, is never stable, it's always changeing... 200 years ago the world was in the grasp of a mini ice age, it started crawling out of it during the 19th century.
While yes C02 levels ARE higher because of Man, this no one can argue, they have been higher in the past, and the Earth still works. |
That's true, but did the current lifeforms exist at that time when CO2 levels and global temperature were higher?
Quote:
|
Quote by: Mr.Vicchio Amazing thing that. Also not a single forecasting computer model can tell you what the climate is going to be 40, 50.. 100 years from now. NOT ONE. How can I be so sure?
They cannot even do it with 30 year runs, based on all known variables. I.E. not a single forecast model has been able to take the known climate, circa 1970, with known C02 increases, all that, and reach anything close to wha the reality was in 2000. They were all OFF, by 3+ degrees celsius. 3 was the LOW miss.
Now tell me, why do you accept these doomsday predictions and dire warnings, when they are based on such faulty premis? |
Seems like you've made up your mind by reading Michael Crickton's State of Fear. Funny how it conflicts with the scientific consensus.
If global warming wasn't a reality, then why does the UK and EU allow with Russia view it as an incoming problem that needs solving. What benefits do these countries gain by imposing emissions cuts which inevitably could damage the profitability of some large companies (especially those involved in energy)? I'll leave you to think about that.