| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,)
I believe you yourself made the point earlier that science is constantly changing. The difference is that you assume that evolution is true and base all your arguments on that, whereas I assume that the Bible is true. There are many questions that science cannot answer and there are many questions that are still unanswered by evolutionists, such as where did the original matter come from? As I said earlier, nothing comes from nothing.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
You just don't seem to get it. Science does not ASSUME that evolution is true. Science accepts evolution because it has validated the change that occurred over long time periods. It accepts evolutionary theory because that theory best explains such change. In short, science seeks the answers; it doesn't assume them from the start.
You can't see this because, as you yourself have avowed, you start with an assumption about the answers -- you assume that an account in the Bible is literally true. In consequence, you are willing ignore the facts, or to twist the data to fit your assumptions. |