View Single Post
Old Feb 9, 2004, 06:10 pm   #208 (permalink) (top)
fogus
Molten Ash
 
Posts: 67
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by (makeshiftpatriot,)


The two theories could be perfectly complementary, if the bible weren't taken so literally. So, why is it?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Very good question. Why is the bible taken so literally?
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

The reason we creationists take Genesis literally is because that is the way the writer of genesis intended it to be.

“As far as I know there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who does not believe that the writer(s) of Genesis 1-11 intended to convey to their readers the idea that:

(a) Creation took place in a series of six days which were the same as the days of 24 hours we now experience;
(b) the figures contained in the Genesis genealogies provided by simple addition a chronology from the beginning of the world up to the later stages in the Biblical story;
&copy; Noah’s flood was understood to be world-wide and extinguished all human and animal life except for those in the ark”

~ Professor James Barr, Hebrew scholar and Oriel Professor of the Interpretation of the Holy Scriptures at Oxford University. Personal letter dated April 23, 1984.


~Fogus
fogus is offline   Reply With Quote