</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by Not to be too picky, but there's no such thing as evolutionism, nor is there gravitism etc...<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Sorry about that slip, I've just been a little postmodern lately, and I guess I just wanted to look at evolutionary biology as another belief, with an equal capacity for explaining our world as anything else
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by There are many questions that science cannot answer and there are many questions that are still unanswered by evolutionists, such as where did the original matter come from? As I said earlier, nothing comes from nothing.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
I had a really interesting conversation with a friend of mine the other day. She said that from what she's heard, a lot of physicists come to a conclusion that there must be a "god" of some sort, but some intangible force that creates order and regulates the way things work in the universe. But here we completely diverge from the topic, and get into something more philisophical.
I think the main problem with the debate of evolution vs. creation is that they're trying to explain different things. Evolution tries to track the changes in organisms through time, and does so successfully, both in mathematical modeling and actual field-collected data. This is something scientific and tangible. Creationism, despite its posturing as a science, tries to explain origins, and thats a philisophical debate about the intangible. The two theories could be perfectly complementary, if the bible weren't taken so literally. So, why is it?
-b