[shunyadragon]

</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (fogus,)
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by
jpapadpapa
There are many questions that science cannot answer and there are many questions that are still unanswered by evolutionists, such as where did the original matter come from? As I said earlier, nothing comes from nothing.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

I agree with jpapadpapa on this. I would clarify this statement though. (Simply dealing with the non supernatural:) No human comes from non-human; No life comes from non-life; No matter comes from non-matter; no thing(s) comes from no thing(s) (absolutely nothing); etc.

But this is more on the philosophy and logic side of evolution, rather than the scientific side; which I assume this thread is more devoted to.

Does any one know how to make the signatures work?

~ Fogus<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>

You can click on you name in red at the top of the page and I think from there edit you profile.

The philosophy of science and religion does play a role. As you stated the premise or assumptions of 'Creation Science' before the debate begins is 'No human comes from non-human; No life comes from non-life'. The other main assumption is that the Bible is a literally true inspired document by God from cover to cover. All other scientific evidence outside these assumptions must fit or be dismised. This method of approaching the sciences is unacceptable by most scientists.