</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,) Just a quick post... I can't seem to get away!
You did not address the second point fogus made about natural selection.
For those of you who have obtained your information about the flood from Talk.Origins, here is a rebuttal of Mark Isaak’s “Problems with a Global Flood” FAQ in the Talk.Origins Archive:
http://www.trueorigin.org/arkdefen.asp<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Checked this out too. I have seen this before. Detailed layering in volcanic and other recent deposits do not explain the detailed layering of most geologic deposites including volcanic deposites when each layer contains rivers swamps and other features formed descretly in each layer. In fact they confirm the long geologic history model, because these types of deposits are found in the layers of other deposits that cannot be explained this way.
Nothing was said of the layers of limestone hundreds of feet thick with hundreds of feet of coral reefs that cannot form quickly by any known mechanism.
Much of this was addressed in the rebuttal indicated by pooeypants. This was
jpapadpapa still hasn't responded to the other TIME issues.
The empty cup contains the most
Frank A Doonan
Turn weapons into peace and friendship with gifts of jade-silk
www.shunyadragon.com
I do not know, therefore I think . . .