| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,)
But how does this prove anything? Is something considered transitional simply because it has some characteristics of another species? I don't understand how this proves evolution because as I stated before, could the Creator not have created an animal with characteristics of both? Why not?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
It comes down to which is the logical assumption and what data do we have to intrepret. Seeing as no one has yet proved the indirect effects due to a creator let alone observe the creator itself, I think in science we can clearly disregard any model concerning with it.
The problem you have is that you don't want to accept the science, no matter how much "proof" we have you'll just ignore it, and it's showing.
If you've got evidence that the creator designed and created all species on earth, then present it to us for then we can see it with our own eyes. Being told by an ancient book to blindly believe anything is not something I am willing to accept. |