| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,)
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by
Do not deceptively quote out of context.
Please do not lie and quote people out of context again. This shows horrible character on your part. Can't you follow all Ten Commandments?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
I think you need to go back and read the article you link to, as well as the quote. I am not quoting out of context, you are simply twisting what is being said to make it appear that I am. The point I am making is that he admitted that there are no fossils that support his belief. Clearly, he believes in transitional fossils and states this throughout his book, but here is the point: it is a matter of faith because he blatantly admits that he cannot provide any pictures of absolute proof. I don't understand how you can keep misunderstanding what I am saying. How have I taken what he said out of context? If you looked at the sources cited at the bottom of that post, you would have even seen that I already addressed your criticism. Personal attacks are a sign of feeling threatened. This is a tactic often resorted to when someone feels they are losing an arguement and quite frankly, it makes your arguement look weaker.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Please read the entire link I gave you. You are confusing two different things and I believe you to be doing this deliberately.
Matter of faith indeed. It takes just as much faith to believe in evolution/transitionals as it does to believe the earth goes around the sun. |