</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,)
But, for something to actually be scientifically proven, doesn't it have to be observed? That it cannot be observed in a lab is the entire point. Also, they are not making the claim that evolution happens radically, as you state they are.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
Can we reproduce a supernova in a lab?
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by
Is this or is this not a true statement? They have not said anything about the time factor--simply that this is what the whole idea of evolution boils down to.
<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
No, what they claimed is complete BS, basically they're trying to say it went from Reptile -> Mammals.
That's not how it happened and thats why they're wrong.
</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by
Also, I want to point out that just because you give something billions of years to happen does not mean that it will. Certain things are never going to happen mathematically.<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
You're right there, but when you have mathematics to show something is possible, then the long time scale helps even more.