</span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />
Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,) As a clarification, the link I posted earlier is a secular site that is against evolution. They have some links to Biblically-based sites, but they will not answer questions related to the Bible. That is why I thought some of you would find it more compelling than a site such as Answers in Genesis. Here's the link one more time:
http://www.ridgenet.net/~do_while/sage/index.htm<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>
The link is quite hilarious.
For example;
"It is claimed that the reptile-to-mammal evolution is well documented. But for reptiles to evolve into mammals
scales had to have mutated into hair
breasts had to have evolved from nothing
hard-shelled externally laid eggs had to evolve into soft-shelled eggs that were nourished by an umbilical cord and placenta in a womb
etc.
None of these transformations have ever been observed in a laboratory"
None of the those claims have been made in such a way. Evolution doesn't suddenly sprout out new features radically all at once like that. It's not sequential, a lot of what he that refers to requires many thousands of generations to happen. For it to happen in a lab is quite against all odds. Oh please, science against evolution? I've seen better arguments written on a beer mat. Next please.