| </span><blockquote><span class="smallfont">Quote:</span><hr size="1" />Originally Posted by (jpapadpapa,)
What are your thoughts?<hr size="1" /></blockquote><span class='postcolor'>The ICR paper is rather unimpressive. The author would like to know why the proponents of evolution have fronted no explanation, and the simple answer is that one is not necessary. The article plays on the flawed perception that evolution has never been observed, that evidence for it doesn't exist. The author suggests it exists purely as an abstract explanation, when in fact it is not. It is simply another case of Creationists purporting a misconstrued view of evolution, in order to make a point. While I realize the article was not meant as a complete case against evolution, it would help if one could have shown that evolution has never been observed, before making use of Einstein's Gulf to disprove it. This is purely rhetorical because, as I established on page one, it has.
Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito, qua tua te Fortuna sinet. |