| I personally think he was quilty and everyone was cheering the judgement.
However, many have doubts if the justice system here in the L.A. court systems was worth praising.
For example: The jury ruled he was guilty of pre-mediated murder in the death of his unborn son, but he was only guilty of a non-mediated (lesser crime) murder of his wife. That seems confusing to me, how can a jury find him guilty of planning to murder his unborn son by drowning while not planning to murder it's mother (wife)? Was his wife just an accidental death that happened when he killed his unborn son?
His poweful and famous lawyer was not present during the announcment, he was spotted eating lunch near his office across town.
One of the people that the judge removed from the jury was a skilled lawyer. Leaving open the chances for a more emotionally motivated determination of guilt.
The jury came to a fast determination of gult quickly after the judge instructed them to do so, but what the told the jury is still a secret of the court but might be used when the trial will be appealed.
Like I said he was most likely guilty but our whole so-called justice system needs fixing if we are going to continue to have respect for it.
Technosoul. |