| Congress shall make no law, but Bush is not Congress.
So he can according to his legal advisor, soon to be the next Atturny General.
I think they can have a legal and secular difinition for the word marrage that could be said not to be one based on religion or morality. Example: They ruled that Mormons cannot marry more then one woman which was their "religious" idea that fit their sense of morality. They did not leave that determination in the hands of the state of Utah. What consitutes a family or not a family is relative to many other laws on the books, and people move around a lot nowdays from state to state, so we should not leave it fuzzy other wise the courts have no standard to use.
Congress can simple vote.
Yes, Gay marrages will be honored by all the laws pertaining to family and marrage.
or. No, they will be viewed as friendships that would demand other types of legal and binding contracts if so desired.
But it is a tricky topic and so I thnk they should demand a vote that in pretty much represents all of Congress instead of just a slight majority vote win ether way just beyond the middle.
And any Congress person who happens to avoid the issue by not showing up to vote on that day should be fined.
So, should people enter marrage by the rear door, I don't know, not my problem.
Technosoul. |