View Single Post
Old Nov 11, 2004, 09:46 am   #20 (permalink) (top)
bullshitdetector
BANNED
 
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally posted by Dieval,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Dieval,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-PatrickHenry,
"May have been," Dieval? I was just asking from what you have read...
If you have read of irregularities, and the reports seem credible TO YOU, then you could vote for choice 1. If you haven't read of anything or the news you have read doesn't seem credible, then it's 3...
From what I've read, I believe it's wishful thinking of the extreme Dems that there was wide-spread fraud....I believe there may have been some issues, but nothing major.[/b][/quote]


They need someone to blame it on, it can't be possible that their man was not up to snuff and Bush kicked his ass. Oh, of course not!
bullshitdetector is offline   Reply With Quote