Quote:
Originally posted by argonak,
You are correct. If a law works against the constitution, the supreme court has the duty to rule against it.
That said, not everyone agrees with this interpretation of that amendment. |
I find it so funny how people can claim that there is disagreement as to the interpretation. When it becomes the case that their rights are infringed by another religion the intent of the constitution becomes all too clear. There cannot be freedom of religion if the views of a particular religion are specifically favored over another religion or lack thereof. It just doesn't get any simpler than that.
Starboy