[Rainbow]

Originally posted by gr8fuldaniel, So, lets see, out of a possible 638 votes cast, 4,258 voted for Bush. Arrest Bush. The Washington Dispatch Should America Trust the Results of the Election? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commentary by Shane Cory November 5, 2004 Days after the election, 55 million Americans are still scratching their heads and wondering how it is that George W. Bush won reelection.  Garnering 8 million more votes than he earned in 2000, many are raising eyebrows as to how this was accomplished.   While no one wants to cry "fraud" and lead a tinfoil hat brigade, a buzz is growing on the Internet that whispers to the amazed and confused that they should not close the books on this election just yet. Members of the discussion forum, DemocraticUnderground.com dug in and have already found a clear error in the vote count within Ohio.  In one voting precinct in Gahanna, Ohio, 4,258 voters supposedly cast an electronic ballot for George Bush while only 260 voted for John Kerry. While it is vaguely possible that over 94% of voters in the precinct supported George W. Bush, it is a hard number to believe considering that only 638 voters were counted at the polling center. [edit to add link]

The Columbus Dispatch has investigated the matter and the director of the board of elections within the county admitted that Bush only received 365 votes. He stated that a "glitch" occurred in the electronic voting machine during the vote tally. This glitch could have given nearly 4,000 fake votes to George Bush if it had not discovered. The Gahanna incident is just one confirmed mistake and was discovered by activists on the Internet. It was a fairly easy "glitch" to detect given the large discrepancy between the head count at the polling station and the votes for Bush. Given this voting error one must ask, how many more glitches occurred that only involved tens or hundreds of votes?

These few sentences (that follow your original post) solve the whole issue.
It indicates that you (are) either :
- a young and/or very emotional person
- a malicious
- can not be taken seriously
Try (at least) present facts.

You "dislike" Bush ?
There are people out there that "dislike" you. We all have "friends" and "foes", but if we want to be taken as "reasonable", we need to be "better than others".
Bush "lies" ? How about your post ?