| I have often wondered if war is not a type of "late term abortion", is not removing Saddam from power (by soon killing him) not the same thing as aborting an unwanted child, he was unwanted by Bush and thus subject to termination - aborting this right to live in the normal world.
Life is life, how can you say abortion is not okay and capital punishment or war is okay?
Most people would think that a unborn, or a child that is not yet old enough to comprehend choice, is to be protected for moral reasons. But once a person has lived long enough to make moral choices and they pick the wrong choice. And they pick the choice not to conform to "God's law" or the laws of governmental opinion then by so doing they have surrendered thier right to life, due to their actions or how they chose to live that life.
We have the right to look both ways before crossing the street, or to walk into traffic and risk being killed. Going agenst the flow of traffic relative to the collective opinions as stated in law or ethical codes, would not be seen as the fault of the drivers who run over those who are foolish enough not look before crossing the momentum of destiny.
Hmmm? Not that I agree with that perspective, but wanted to toss it in for debate purposes.
Does that make any sense?
Technosoul. |