| To be fair, it's not as if Kerry would be any better - if he were around, he would have still invaded Iraq. The only thing he would have done differently would have been to talk to the UN and ignored them, which would only cause more problems.
The problem is that both parties have adopted interventionism, a system that will cause more problems down the road than it already has - Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, etc. So, until we get a party that has a chance that supports nonintervantionism, we'll always be down this road of military action against othber nations. |